Don't let it get away!
Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.
Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.
LONDON -- After the FTSE 100 index peaked at an all-time closing high of 6,930 on Dec. 31, 1999, this century so far has been a poor one for U.K. investors.
Down goes the Footsie
As I write, the blue-chip index stands at 5,825, down more than 16% nearly 13 years since its peak. In "real" terms (adjusting for inflation), the Footsie has dived roughly 40% since this millennium began. Even after adding in yearly dividends, many investors in U.K. shares will have made a small loss since the "Roaring Nineties."
Up goes director pay
With share prices 40% below their peak in real terms, you'd expect director remuneration to have fallen over this period, right? Wrong, because thanks to a "ratchet effect," executive pay has soared to new heights this century.
Director remuneration rose most steeply during the credit-fueled boom of 2000 to 2007. Although the global financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 did curb executive excess, it has since resumed its "upward-only" trend.
According to the latest report into executive pay from accountants at Deloitte, the average pay raise for FTSE 100 directors was 2.5% this year. This follows an average rise of 3% last year. Notably, a third of executives got no increase in 2012, versus a fifth in 2011. Then again, bonuses as a percentage of salary were higher in 2012 than in any other year apart from 2011.
Deloitte also noted that 43% of FTSE 100 chief executives and 23% of directors own company shares worth at least five times their salaries. However, Deloitte notes that the proportion of bonus schemes with claw-back arrangements has soared to 61%, versus 36% last year.
Nevertheless, directors persist in awarding themselves an over-generous slice of shareholders' profits. Thus, Deloitte argues that there is no room for complacency, despite improvements to the structure of executive compensation.
The shareholder spring
Although Footsie boardroom pay is still creeping up, these latest rises are tiny in comparison with pre-boom pay hikes. Financial pundits are quick to attribute this to an investor backlash dubbed the "shareholder spring" -- a nod to the democratic uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the "Arab Spring."
However, Deloitte's research suggests that this shareholder spring "was not a universal protest movement." Indeed, only two companies failed to gain 50% of votes in favor of executive pay packages. With 100 firms in the blue-chip index, the shareholder spring actually proved to be something of a damp squib!
Even so, Deloitte warns, "It is clear that shareholders have been more vocal and prepared to mount a strong challenge where they feel remuneration is not consistent with how the shares have performed."
The backlash against banks
Nowhere has shareholder revolt been more vocal than in the banking sector. Following huge taxpayer-funded bank bailouts in 2008 and 2009, public resentment against bankers is at record highs. Hence, bank chief executives and chairmen got roasted at this year's annual general meetings, or AGMs.
At Barclays (LSE: BARC.L ) , then-CEO Bob Diamond and then-chairman Marcus Agius got a roasting from shareholders fed up with the bank's falling share price, lower dividends, and sky-high pay within investment bank Barclays Capital.
At Barclays' AGM on April 27, only 73.1% of votes cast approved the bank's remuneration report for 2011, with 26.9% of votes cast against. Following this slap on the wrist, worse followed for Diamond and Agius, as both were forced to resign following the bank's multiyear manipulation of key interest rate LIBOR.
Another bank under the cosh this year was megabank HSBC (LSE: HSBA.L ) . At its AGM on May 27, 10.2% of votes cast were against the approval of the bank's 2011 remuneration report. Notable among executive payouts was the 7.2 million pounds awarded to CEO Stuart Gulliver.
Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS.L ) , which is 82% owned by taxpayers, also came in for criticism from disgruntled shareholders at its AGM on May 30. Even so, 99.7% of votes cast approved its remuneration report, with the government's majority shareholding carrying the day. Also, RBS CEO Stephen Hester was agreed to have "done the right thing" by refusing to accept a bonus for 2011.
Two victims of the "shareholder spring"
Though heads rolled at Barclays this year, this came in response to the bank's blatant market manipulation -- not shareholder votes. Nevertheless, two FTSE 100 chief executives did fall on their swords this year due to shareholder protests over executive pay and performance.
First went AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN.L ) chief executive David Brennan, who decided to retire on June 1 after running the pharmaceutical giant since 2006. This followed a 38% dive in first-quarter profits and a sustained campaign by major shareholders pressing for changes to the board. Of course, Brennan didn't leave empty-handed, as he walked away with a 4.4 million pound windfall. Chairman Louis Schweitzer also left the FTSE 100 firm in June, three months ahead of plan.
Second to depart was Andrew Moss, CEO of insurance behemoth and high-yield favorite Aviva (LSE: AV.L ) . Despite diplomatically declining a 4.6% pay raise to keep his basic pay below 1 million pounds, Moss failed to convince institutional investors of the merits of the insurer's executive pay, with 54% voting against its remuneration report.
On May 8, Moss stepped down, armed with a 1.5 million pound payoff. To find and appoint Moss' successor, John McFarlane moved up to become executive chairman from July 1. As I wrote that month, McFarlane quickly began wielding the axe at Aviva.
Binding votes on pay
Changes to remuneration disclosure and the introduction of a binding vote on remuneration policy should come into effect in late 2013. As a result, Deloitte expects executive pay to "remain at the top of shareholders' agendas for the foreseeable future."
Finally, if you want to build long-term wealth, then stop being sucked into the latest fashions and buying trendy shares. Instead, ignore these "pump and dump" stocks and concentrate on Mr. Market's top-performing sectors. These three stock market gold mines combine decent dividends with solid growth to produce market-beating returns for shareholders. To get on board, download your free copy of this report today!
More from The Motley Fool: