Closet Indexing

Recs

1

I've written before about mutual funds and "window dressing." When funds report their holdings (usually quarterly), they do so based on what they own on one specific day. If they want to look like they've been holding some recent big winners, they might buy some shares just before the day on which their holdings will be reported. They might also make sure to sell any dogs before that day.

Kevin Price tackled window dressing the other day at seekingalpha.com. He noted that many managed mutual funds seem to have been quietly buying lots of broad-market exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and holding them between reporting dates. This may seem innocuous, as it does deliver market-matching returns to shareholders, but remember that actively managed mutual funds should be in the business of aiming to beat the market. Such funds also typically charge much higher fees than index funds and ETFs.

Of course, some ETFs do very well. The iShares S&P Global Telecommunications (NYSE: IXP), for example, has averaged 16% annual growth over the past five years, and holds stocks such as AT&T (NYSE: T), Verizon (NYSE: VZ), China Mobile (NYSE: CHL), and Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S). But while sector-specific funds like these can outperform the overall market, broader ETFs can't hope to do more than match their respective benchmarks.

As Bank of New York Mellon (NYSE: BK) analyst Joe Keenan put it, "It is extraordinary how many traditional long-only mutual funds hold ETFs, either to equitize their cash or to get the market return and then just layer on fees." Apparently, some funds buy ETF shares but then sell them right before they have to report their holdings to the public.

This is a good reminder that when we study mutual funds, we should be vigilant. Years ago, New York Times writer Richard Oppel suggested a method for ferreting out closet indexers: "If a fund has an R-squared of, say, 90, that means that 90% of the fund's movement can be explained by movements in the component stocks of the index." (You can find R-squared data at Morningstar.com, in the "Risk Measures" section of a fund's report.)

For help zeroing in on top-notch funds, I invite you to give our Motley Fool Champion Funds newsletter a whirl -- I've found a bunch of winners there, myself.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 626529, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 6:45:25 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:01 PM
BK $26.19 Down -0.09 -0.34%
The Bank of New Yo… CAPS Rating: ***
CHL $49.47 Down -0.08 -0.16%
China Mobile Ltd.… CAPS Rating: *****
S $3.76 Down -0.09 -2.34%
Sprint Nextel Corp CAPS Rating: **
T $26.02 Down -0.09 -0.34%
AT&T, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
VZ $30.43 Down -0.09 -0.29%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Dollar-cost averaging: Dollar-cost averaging is the discipline of regularly buying shares of stock. An investor using this long-term technique would invest a set amount every month, as opposed to saving it up and investing it in one lump sum.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!