Sponsored by
Small-Cap Investing
  •  

Why Aren't You Earning 50% Annual Returns?

By Joe Magyer and Tim Hanson September 27, 2007 Comments (20)

114 Recommendations

Look at the title of this article. Is there any more preposterous question a client or boss could ask an investing professional?

Flip it around. Is there a scarier question for an investing professional to hear from a client or boss?

So you can imagine our surprise/heart-stopping fear when our boss, Fool co-founder Tom Gardner, put us in a room and asked point-blank: "Why aren't you earning 50% annual returns?"

50 what?
To put 50% annual returns in perspective, no money manager anywhere has been able to achieve that degree of success for any meaningful period of time. Perhaps the closest have been Jim Simons of Renaissance Technologies and Joel Greenblatt of Gotham Capital, whose funds reportedly have 40% annual returns.

So where did Tom get his outlandish number? From none other than Warren Buffett.

Of course, Buffett also said he had too much money to manage to prove it. How convenient.

Nuts to that, Tom
But after a few weeks that would have made Elisabeth Kubler-Ross proud, we finally answered the question. And while the answers may not help us earn 50% annual returns (still an outlandish number), they can help us all make more money in the stock market.

Ready to learn more?

Lesson 1: Sell your index fund
There is no surer way to not beat the index than by investing in the index itself. Not exactly a revelation, right? Investing in index funds leads to near-certain long-run underperformance due to transaction costs and management fees.

Given that, what would possess a returns-hungry investor to go that route? While owning an index fund makes sense in many cases, if you're serious about market-beating returns, selling your index fund is step one.

Lesson 2: Don't lose money
The aforementioned Warren Buffett has two rules. Rule No. 1: Don't lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget Rule No. 1. While we ribbed Buffett above, we also respect him a great deal and believe he is spot-on about losing money.

Losing principal soaks your long-run returns. To illustrate, imagine you've lost 50% of your initial investment on your biggest holding. The next year, it bounces back with a 100% return. Guess what? You're still worse off than if you'd just left that money in a savings account.

Efficient market believers argue that risk and reward go hand in hand. That's generally true. But there is one obvious alternative path.

Lesson 3: Look where no one else is looking
Let us put this plainly -- you can't achieve anything even remotely close to 50% annual long-term returns by investing in large-cap stocks. Period. Sure, you can best the market in the long run with that approach (and doing so by just a couple of percentage points annually would be a notable triumph), but you won't get to 50% annually.

If you want to work toward that mythical 50% mark, you'll need to consistently crush the market by finding the next home run stock and holding for five years or more. Your best chance is by going small.

Why's that? First, small caps, because of their size, have more upside potential than large caps. Second, because Wall Street players are typically constrained to only looking at large- and mid-cap companies, you can take advantage of pricing inefficiencies.

Just take a look. If you're sticking with just S&P 500-type stocks, you're swimming with sharks:

Company

Market Cap

Number of Analysts Covering

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

$510 billion

24

Intel (Nasdaq: INTC)

$151 billion

42

Altria (NYSE: MO)

$143 billion

15

eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY)

$53 billion

32

Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX)

$20 billion

21

Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO)

$38 billion

22

Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO)

$36 billion

40

Data from Thomson.

With small caps, you can get greater reward and you don't have to outwit a horde of Ivy League CFA-types to buy the best ideas.

Ready for 50%?
Let us be clear: You can do just fine financially by saving and investing regularly in an index fund. But if you want to shoot for 50% annual returns, those are three ready-made ways to get started.

Yes, there will be volatility. Yes, they may not get you all the way to 50%. But if you employ the strategy faithfully, you should be able to seriously accelerate your portfolio's growth.

At our Motley Fool Hidden Gems small-cap investing service, we specialize in identifying small, cheap stocks that Wall Street simply isn't willing to look at. Our picks are beating the market by more than 32 percentage points on average, and you can take a look at today's two brand-new recommendations by joining the service free for 30 days. Click here for more information.

Neither Joe nor Tim owns shares of any company mentioned. Intel is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. eBay, Starbucks, and Yahoo! are Stock Advisor picks. CEO Tom Gardner also has high expectations for the Fool's disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On September 27, 2007, at 12:21 PM, TMFTenacious wrote: Report this Comment

    Nice article, gentlemen. I'm going to set the over/under for readers who get the Elisabeth Kubler-Ross reference (sans google assistance) at 3.5

  • On September 27, 2007, at 5:03 PM, rmherbert wrote: Report this Comment

    don't know liz but i do know rio,fro,gfa and wynn. and i hate tech stox and mttg. did i mention i hate tech?

  • On September 27, 2007, at 5:08 PM, rmherbert wrote: Report this Comment

    oh by the way, dad bought a pile of xom in 92. how do ya like me now? and i still hate tech. wanna see apple tank? i'll buy 100 shares and jobs will do something stupid and it will drop 50 by weeks end.

  • On September 27, 2007, at 5:44 PM, vest0r2 wrote: Report this Comment

    I loved AAPL and it made me sad to sell. I cannot believe it's going any higher.

  • On September 27, 2007, at 10:53 PM, mikeinmadrid wrote: Report this Comment

    Gotham capital achieved 50% annualized gains from 1985 to 1994.

  • On September 28, 2007, at 10:58 AM, TMFMmbop wrote: Report this Comment

    Mike,

    Do you have a source for that? I've heard that, too, but couldn't verify it. The 40% number is the only one I could verify.

    Thanks in advance,

    Tim

  • On September 28, 2007, at 6:13 PM, TMFMmbop wrote: Report this Comment

    Mike,

    My coauthor, who has Greenblatt's book with that data, has alerted me that my response was opaque.

    What I meant was, do you know if they kept up that 50% for a 20 year period? That was the period which we judged Medallion, and I was searching for the same number for Gotham. The number I got was 40-something.

    Thanks again,

    Tim

  • On September 29, 2007, at 5:36 PM, matstao wrote: Report this Comment

    I'm with you on the idea of investing in small caps for large potential gains, but it's not really the way to follow Warren's first 2 rules. Invest in a few small caps, and you will lose some money on one of them. Just look at the Hidden Gems scorecard for supporting evidence.

  • On September 30, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Pilarchard wrote: Report this Comment

    Come on guys, 50% is no big deal. You can turn 50% by working small arbitage plays at home on your computer. It's the double up which is hard. If you know what you're doing though, and you're dealing with money you don't have to live on (HIGH RISK), making 140%/y in currencies is completely reasonable (I turned 80% since I started in March. Athough this return is above average, it is in every way mediocre compared with what is possible...). If you have an understanding of macroeconomic forces, technical analysis, and a little statistics, it's easy money. Also, since there's only 7-8 major currencies, rather than 10000 stocks, it's really easy to get your head around the marketplace, allowing you to pick your trades in minutes. And with commissions for major pairs falling steadily (EurUsd is at 0.065% at some brokers. That's 0.9 pips for those already in the forex), you'll never want to trade stocks again!

    If you're not comfy with currencies, options are your next best bet, since they supercharge your stock picks and give you greater flexibility than a simple long or short on a stock.

    NB:I am not (yet) a financial analyst or portfolio manager (just a McGill kid paying his tuition through his investments!!). You should talk with your investment professionals about the rewards and risks of forex before you chose to invest in currencies, as there is a tremendous amount of risk if you don't know what you're doing (Don't blow your retirement!!). If you and your advisors are comfortable with this risk, please swear you will test your strategies in a game account for no less than 3 months. I perfectly serious. 3 months is the Absolute Minimum sane testing time. Also, if you research various brokers, you'll find they try to woo you with leverage ranging from 100:1 to 400:1. Yes, it's true that 400:1 leverage magnifies your gains 400 times. However, it's also true that you can lose your life savings in 3 seconds at 400:1. Until you're extremely comfortable with the market, never trade more than 10:1. (Pros seldom trade more than 2:1. But they are often responsible for other people's money, and so they can't afford a large draw down.)

    Once you've done your homework and learned how the currency markets work, the double-up can be yours with less than an hour of trading each day.

  • On September 30, 2007, at 9:01 AM, Pilarchard wrote: Report this Comment

    Edit: Let me be perfectly clear about stocks. Although they are slow and much less exciting then other forms of investment, if you're reading this website, you're in good hands. I've monitored the returns of the various portfolios advertised on this site for quite some time, and I have to admit, I am very impressed. (There's no way I'd be able to beat the Gardners on stocks. That's for sure!) All I'm saying is that it's possible to do much better (although with much greater risk!) if alternative investments are considered (forex, derivatives, etc.)

    Cheers,

    C

  • On September 30, 2007, at 10:22 AM, babuthomas wrote: Report this Comment

    Hidden Gems recommendations are great and they do provide great appreciations. But most of the appreciation in the small cap stock happens in an hour from the time recommendation is posted except for a few I have noticed.(This month's hit about 20% up in a few minutes) If you follow the recommendation and buy it after that time practical for most non-day traders, the upside is much lower than claimed and the downside will be a lot higher.

  • On October 01, 2007, at 12:32 PM, dooooooom wrote: Report this Comment

    Agreed with the above. This also shows that the newsletter here is actually quite popular and powerful, enough to drive some of the less traded stock recommended in stock advisor up by a lot once it's recommended.

  • On October 01, 2007, at 12:34 PM, dooooooom wrote: Report this Comment

    Also, this article is mainly a "sales" piece for the hidden gem. It has nothing to do with value investing or Warren Buffet, and I don't quite like how the author of the article is using Warren Buffet's gains and strategies for something that's almost otherwise irrelevant (not to mention contrary to Buffet's value investing)

  • On October 01, 2007, at 4:56 PM, ikkyu2 wrote: Report this Comment

    I would prefer to outwit a hoard than a horde :)

  • On October 01, 2007, at 6:01 PM, chitownjester wrote: Report this Comment

    babuthomas and dooooooom- you must not be able to read the scorecard - Bill doubled your money in 9 months by recommending CMG-B, and it did not all happen in a few days, you could have jumped in weeks or months later and done fine. Fool HG has consistently beat the market for the past 5 years (more than doubled it in fact). The "pop" experienced when a stock recommendation is made, is sometimes result of the recommendation, more often it is not, just a general market move. Sometimes stocks even (gasp!) lose value after recommended. I've followed Fool for more than a year, there is plenty to be made following these guys. I bought NVT last year below $30 because it was a SA recommendation. Let me tell you, it went down before it went up. But it eventually went up nice. I also bought BWLD based on HG rec, and OYOG. Doing very well on both.

    And what about their recs:

    CTRP 01/06

    MIDD 10/05

    LOOP 4/07

    and on and on.

    Don't kid yourself that you can't make money. You need to research, buy and HOLD (the 3rd seems to be forgotten sometimes).

    And yes, the article is obviously a sales pitch, but it cost less than a couple hundred bucks for a year of investment advice. Trust me, its worth it. Andy why does it not have anything to do with Buffett? He said he could make 50% returns by analyzing and investing in small caps. This is what HG does, they look for exactly what Buffett looks for:

    1) growing business

    2) great management

    3) great balance sheet

    4) moat

    5) underappreciated/misunderstood by market

    Jesse

  • On October 05, 2007, at 2:57 PM, SinBySilence wrote: Report this Comment

    Personally I'm not earning 50% annually because I'm earning 60%, but good article anyway.

  • On October 05, 2007, at 3:34 PM, jspatei wrote: Report this Comment

    I agree with chitownjester. What about OMTR, just recently? Its been on a tear, was up ~38% the month of rec, and is now sitting at 140 odd % gain. I believe a buy and hold strategy on good small caps is very effective, even after you've missed the recommendation price surge.

  • On October 05, 2007, at 4:37 PM, PonderingItAll wrote: Report this Comment

    In almost every case, you can just wait a few days or weeks to buy a Hidden Gems pick at or below the recommended buy-in price. Then your results will track (or even beat) the HG Scoreboard. All it takes is a bit of patience and the ability to calmly accept it when you miss the boat on the rare pick that never goes down again.

  • On October 05, 2007, at 5:33 PM, playin4profit wrote: Report this Comment

    It is not hard to earn >50% annual returns using covered call options. I've easily and repeatedly locked in 5% or greater returns by buying stocks that have obvious short term upside potential, then selling covered calls on them. So far I've always been called out because the stocks went above the strike price. Just last month I gained 17% by buying TSL at 40 and selling the $45 dollar covered call one month out. The stock went above 55, but I don't care, because my goal was to lock in at least 5% a month and I exceeded my goal by another 12%.

  • On October 05, 2007, at 5:57 PM, cabostacos wrote: Report this Comment

    i think some of these guys might make a fortune sharing how they make 60% a year with stocks.

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 537562, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 7/9/2008 8:51:29 AM, No ticker

FREE 1-Step Fool.com Access!

Already registered? Login Here

Simply enter your email address below to get:

  • Instant access to this article and all in-depth Motley Fool news and analysis.
  • A FREE special report, "The Motley Fool's Top Two Picks," immediately sent to your inbox. Inside you'll read about the Fool's two best plays for new money in 2008 — this report is free for a limited time.

No, thanks

Related Tickers

eBay, Inc.

EBAY Up! $28.65 +1.73 (+6.43%) 4:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
2930 Outperforms
451 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,267.34+1.20%
DJIA11,384.21+1.36%
RSL 2K674.34+2.44%
NASD2,276.34+1.47%
Updated: 4:04:12 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Will the U.S. economy fall into recession?

Sponsored by: