Throw This Stock Away

Is it too late to be bearish on retail?

You could argue that most of the problematic chains have already been pounded, but I disagree. Weaker chains will continue to get pummeled. And now that the holidays are gone, it will take several quarters before investors even begin to consider owning the industry's laggards.

Every week, I single out a stock that seems headed for trouble, then suggest three stocks that might replace it if disaster strikes. Who gets tossed out this week? Come on down, Sears Holdings (Nasdaq: SHLD  ) .

Shears for Sears
I have a soft spot for the country's fourth-largest major retailer. My first real job was with Sears, selling maintenance agreements for the retailer's appliances during a chunk of my junior year in high school. If only I could sell maintenance agreements for Sears Holdings itself these days.

The retailer is failing on so many different levels. Remember when its acquisition of Kmart was hailed as a real estate play? I guess we all know how swell the commercial real estate market is these days. Big-box chains are scaling back, if not liquidating entirely, a la Circuit City. 

Things get even uglier when you consider Sears Holdings' financial performance. How did the company do over the telltale holidays? Don't ask. Same-store sales at domestic Sears locations fell a sharp 12.8% in December. Comps held up better at Kmart, but the chain also posted negative sales at the store level, unlike its rival discounters.

Analysts foresee the company posting a profit of just $1.35 a share for the fiscal year that ended last month, and earning just $0.44 a share for the current fiscal year. Naturally, these are really depressed net income levels, but the rock-bottom projections ultimately suggest that no one will warm up to Sears Holdings as an earnings-based value play for some time.

Sears Holdings can't do anything right these days. Even when it decides to draw the line and buy back stock, it still gets burned. It's been paying as much as $150 a share to repurchase its stock in recent years, squandering most of its cash along the way. Anyone who followed the company's lead then probably regrets it now.

Good news
But I don't talk down a stock unless I have three alternatives that I believe will outperform the company getting the heave-ho. Let's go over the three fill-ins.

  • Target: I'll resist naming the obvious discounter -- Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) -- because I believe the Target's "cheap chic" image will help it land the department-store masses who start trading down this year. The stock is trading at nearly half of last year's high, it fetches just 10 times trailing earnings, and it's beaten Wall Street's profit estimates in four consecutive quarters.
  • VF (NYSE: VFC  ) : How many retailers earn analysts' confidence for improving profitability this year? There are a few turnaround plays -- like goth hub Hot Topic (Nasdaq: HOTT  ) and its Twilight-inspired renaissance -- but few that have been consistently growing like VF. As a supplier of hot brands like Lee jeans and Vans footwear, the company is less sensitive to chain-specific weakness. Sure, it also runs a few of its own stores, but the company has perfected that balance. Back in October, VF raised its dividend for the 36th year in a row. 
  • Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) : Why fix what isn't broken? Amazon.com bucked the holiday malaise, becoming one of the few retailers -- or e-tailers -- to deliver refreshing growth in a tightening market. Net sales and income climbed 18% and 9%, respectively. A penny-pinching climate may also benefit online closeout specialists such as Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK  ) , but you may as well go with the market leader until Amazon leads investors astray.

Other headlines from the weekly trash bin:

Do you like my substitutions? Would you rather stick it out with the tossed company? Are there other stocks I should look at in future editions of this column? Let me have it in the comment box below.

VF is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Wal-Mart Stores and Sears Holdings are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Amazon.com is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz hates being hard on the softer side of Sears, however deserved the criticism may be. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (9)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 12, 2009, at 11:28 PM, nolatom wrote:

    One small correction. It was actually KMart that acquire Sears after Eddie Lampert snaked KMart in bankruptcy. He sold the best KMart RE off (some of it actually to Sears) and then used that money to acquire Sears--which then became SHLD.

    Sears/Kmart are lousy declining retailers (Sears Canada is actually pretty decent). But Eddie bleeds cash from the dying carcass and shrinks the float and at the end of the day there's some value left in the real estate and the brands and Sears Canada. Is it $40 a share? Is it $20 share? Is it $80 a share? Probably depends on how long Eddie can keep sucking cash out and shrinking the float.

    Lousy Company, complicated stock. I'm neither short nor long, I merely watch it for entertainment.

    Feel bad for the employees who work for a dead end company.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 830516, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/31/2014 6:38:20 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement