3 Ridiculously Cheap, High-Quality Companies

Recs

12

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Of all the insight I've heard over these few crazy months, the most telling came from an investor who appeared on CNBC last fall and, being entirely serious, advised, "There're only two positions to be in right now: cash, and fetal."

I get it. Even with the recent rally, it's ugly out there. Many companies that overleveraged their balance sheets are permanently impaired and will likely never fully rebound. Exploding financials like Citigroup (NYSE: C) come to mind. We had an unprecedented boom; now we're in the middle of an unprecedented bust. That's how markets work.

Even so, history tells us time and time again that market panics and forced sell-offs indiscriminately throw the good out with the bad. Amid the frenzy over financial markets and the "sell-now-ask-questions-later" mood of global investors, opportunities are being created for bargain-hunting investors like we haven't seen in decades.

Using the wisdom of our 135,000-member-strong CAPS community, I've hunted down a few dirt cheap, high-quality companies. Have a look:

Company

Recent Share Price

Forward P/E Ratio

5-Year Expected Growth Rate

TTM Return on Equity

Dividend Yield

CAPS Rating  
(out of 5)

McDonald's
(NYSE: MCD)

$60.24

14.4

9%

32%

3.3%

****

Wal-Mart Stores
(NYSE: WMT)

$50.87

13.1

12%

21%

2.1%

***

SYSCO
(NYSE: SYY)

$24.14

13.5

12%

32%

3.9%

*****

Data from Yahoo! Finance and Motley Fool CAPS, as of June 4.

All three are well-established, large-cap stocks. Let's break down the bullish argument for each one.

Golden arches, golden returns
Frugality. Necessity. Convenience. These are words that will underline the restructuring of our economy. Moving from an "I deserve it!" mentality to a "can I cut this out of my budget?" culture is written in stone, as shell-shocked consumers adjust to the demise of easy credit.

Some companies, however, can thrive off this shift. McDonald's is one of them. It holds a lucrative combination of both brand-name appeal and bargain-priced necessities that is extremely rare. As consumers scale down and cut back, cheap food from a name they know becomes a magnet.

While the rest of the market crumbled, McDonald's shares are actually up over the past year. So why are we even considering them a bargain? Here's what CAPS All-Star wiz11 has to say:

McD's has a solid model, well thought out and is obviously time proven. Name brand recognition and innovative ideas are helping bolster the companies performance as people try to tighten their belts (pun intended). They are gaining market share as their target market expands due to spending habits being reined in (people don't go out to eat at a fancy restaurant, they take the kids to McD's for a fast, cheap meal). Meanwhile, the company is taking advantage of [Starbucks Nasdaq: SBUX)] (and others) weaknesses and has been experimenting with Tea and Coffee products-preliminary results are that these ideas are taking off.

Valuation wise, shares trade at less than 15 times forward earnings. The cheapest stock in the market? Not by a long shot. But keep perspective in mind here: This is a growing company with an exceptional niche heading into an economy practically built for its business model. That ain't bad.

And another ...
Wal-Mart is an equally impressive "scale-down" story as consumers hunt for bargains on everyday goods. Less industrial than Costco (NYSE: COST) and not as high-end as Target (NYSE: TGT), Wal-Mart has a near-stranglehold on the "I'm looking for cheap food, toothpaste, and maybe some new socks" crowd. Here's what CAPS member TexasPineapple had to say:

Bargain shopping is here to stay. [Wal-Mart] is just looking for the next product, market segment or service to achieve dominance. Ready cash needs to be deployed and their record is pretty good in being ahead of the curve in average to good market environments which seems the most likely scenario given the two steps forward, 1.5 steps back patterns.

Food for thought
While we're on the subject of cheap necessities, check out food giant SYSCO. I don't necessarily like the high reliance on restaurants -- most of which may struggle -- but the efficiency, profitability, and dominance of this company is quite compelling. As CAPS member StockTradingFool writes:

What's there NOT to like about SYSCO? It's the top dog in a growing market, it's got a great balance sheet, it's been consistently increasing its dividend (which is currently yielding in excess of 4%), it's dividend payout ratio is less than 50% (meaning that it should be able to sustain the current dividend), and it's PEG ratio is right around 1.0 (meaning it's considered to be fairly priced).

Your turn to chime in
Have your own take on any of these companies? More than 135,000 investors use CAPS to share ideas and swap opinions. Check it out and speak your mind. It's 100% free to participate.

For related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Costco and Starbucks are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. Costco, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart are Inside Value picks. SYSCO is an Income Investor selection. The Fool owns shares of Costco and Starbucks, and has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 1:28 PM, madmilker wrote:

    you people would pump refrigerators on the North Pole if ther wus a dollar in it...

    People in America need to realize jus what got America in this shape…”cheap” yes so-call cheap items from a foreign land.

    quote*Wal-Mart firmly believes in local procurement. We recognize that by purchasing quality products, we can generate more job opportunities, support local manufacturing and boost economic development. Over 95% of the merchandise in our stores in China is sourced locally. We have established partnerships with nearly 20,000 suppliers in China. *end quote!

    Now! if there be 182 country’s making items for the world to buy and they have only 5% of the pie in China…duh! This company makes the nice people of China support their currency(yuan) by keeping it in their country working for the people there…. but with the “yuan” going up in value and the US dollar going down…all the foreign items that the American consumer buys thinking it is cheap has went up in price.

    People…its all about the currency and to keep a currency strong you got to keep it floating around the country you live in so it can work for you. For the past 12 years all them US dollars are being shipped overseas to a foreign bank and with the American worker not making anything for the foreigner to buy the “we the people” have to turn to the “second” largest employer in America(Uncle Sam) to sell “we the people” debt in order to get all them dollars back!

    50 years ago a foreigner would had given their left nut for a US dollar or a Hershey’s chocolate bar and today the same foreigner has got Uncle Sam and the American consumer by both all the while Hershey is moving the chocolate factory to Mexico. Wake up! America and think “MADE IN AMERICA.”

    quote*"Considering that there are over 30,000 ships at sea this morning," writes James Carlton, director of the Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies Program, in an e-mail, "the total number of organisms and species in this global 'bioflow' on the morning your readers read your piece could be staggering - billions of individuals, and thousands of species."

    Indeed, scientists have long considered ballast water the primary way invasive aquatic organisms are introduced. From the zebra mussel's arrival in the Great Lakes, to an American jellyfish severely disrupting Black Sea fisheries, the potential costs of accidental introduction of a species to new homes can be tremendous. Aquatic invasives cost the US $9 billion yearly, according to estimates by David Pimentel, professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y. Zebra and quagga mussels (a cousin to the zebra) alone cost the $1 billion annually.*end quote!

    tat is $9 billion a year in hidden taxes to all Americans...

    cheap ain't chic and it cost America............jobs!

    "Now let us look at Wal-Mart again; you buy a product there, 6% goes to the employees, 10-18% is profit to the company, 25% goes to other costs and 50% goes to re-stock or the cost of goods sold. Of the 50% about 20-25% goes to China, a guess, but you get the point. Now then, how long will it take at 433 Billion dollars at year for China to have all of our money, leaving no money flow for us to circulate? At a 17 Trillion dollar economy less than 40-years minus the 1/6 they buy from us. Some say that if we keep putting money into our economy, it would take forever, but if we do not then eventually all the money flow will go. If China buys our debt then eventually they own us, no need to worry about a war, they are buying America, due in part to our own mismanaged trade, so whose fault is that? Not necessarily China, as they are doing what's in the best interests, and we should make sure that trade is not only free, but fair too."

    http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/TheFlowofTrade.pdf

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    I agree, they are high quality companies, but I have to disagree with you characterization of them as being dirt cheap. They are near their highs, and while they do have some growth potential, there are many more that have significantly more potential. Just my opinion.

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 1:44 PM, madmilker wrote:

    " Teacherman1"....you have a gr8 opinion.

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 1:50 PM, MotleyGulibles wrote:

    Motley Fool... they would pump a one tentacle octopus!

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 1:57 PM, dividendgrowth wrote:

    All three are good companies, they are just not ridiculously cheap.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 914767, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 6:08:07 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
C $4.20 Down -0.06 -1.41%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
MCD $63.97 Up +0.56 +0.88%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
SYY $27.04 Up +0.10 +0.37%
SYSCO Corp CAPS Rating: *****
TGT $47.46 Down -0.44 -0.92%
Target Corp CAPS Rating: ***
WMT $54.28 Down -0.26 -0.48%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Bond rating agency: A bond rating agency is a firm that specializes in rating debt instruments. The usual firms include Standard and Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!