Recs

10

4 Reasons Not to Fund an IRA

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

IRAs come in two main flavors: traditional and Roth. If you can't choose between the two, why not choose neither? After all, IRAs really aren't for everyone. Here are a few reasons you might want to avoid them.

You don't want to lower your taxable income
Perhaps you're perfectly happy paying a bigger slice of your income to Uncle Sam. If you make $60,000, and you're looking at a 25% tax rate, you'll only have to pay around $15,000 -- big deal! Who cares that a $5,000 contribution to a traditional IRA (those 50 or older can contribute up to $6,000) will lower your income to $55,000, and your tax to $13,750? Is $1,250 really that much money? Besides, the government could use it.

You don't want tax-free investments
If you're selfish, go ahead and invest in a Roth IRA. When you withdraw from it in retirement, you won't pay a dime in taxes, robbing our deserving government of critically needed funds. (Have you seen our deficit lately?) Check out how you'd be hurting America with the following companies. I picked some of the most extreme examples I could find, just to show you how bad the situation can get:

Company

20-Year Avg. Annual Return

Would Have Turned $10,000 Into

Capital Gains Tax Avoided With Roth IRA

Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO  )

33.6%

$3.3 million

$490,000

EMC (NYSE: EMC  )

28.7%

$1.6 million

$232,000

Best Buy (NYSE: BBY  )

27.5%

$1.3 million

$193,000

PotashCorp (NYSE: POT  )

26.9%

$1.2 million

$175,000

UnitedHealth (NYSE: UNH  )

26.2%

$1.0 million

$155,000

Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  )

23.3%

$662,000

$98,000

Paychex (Nasdaq: PAYX  )

22.8%

$607,000

$90,000

Data: Yahoo! Finance. Assumes maximum 15% rate on capital gains.

You don't want money for retirement
Accumulating wealth for your golden years just isn't everybody's thing. Probably you have plenty coming to you via Social Security. I know that my last statement from the Social Security Administration suggested that I might collect $2,000 per month -- a whopping $24,000 per year! Who couldn't live on that?

If you invest $5,000 per year in a Roth IRA, and it grows at an annual average of 10% -- the market's long-term average, though no one told that to the companies in the table above -- in 25 years you'll end up with more than $540,000! Per our Rule Your Retirement newsletter, that would offer you an annual income of more than $20,000, just by itself.

You don't want a variety of options
IRAs' flexibility can be a real drag. Who needs all those confusing possibilities? Your employer probably offers you a 401(k), and it most likely gives you a choice of a handful of mutual funds in which to invest your money, nice and simple. So what if many of those funds aren't great performers, or charge high fees?

Open an IRA account at a good brokerage, and your head will soon be spinning. You'll be able to invest in hundreds of mutual funds of all stripes, and thousands of stocks. How will you make sense of that?

In short, unless you want to save big bucks for your retirement, while reducing your tax bill significantly, and with the freedom to invest in exactly the stocks or funds you want, IRAs probably aren't for you.

Learn more about all the tiresome, aggravating advantages of these retirement accounts in our IRA Center.

6 stocks you can't afford to ignore! Motley Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner just handpicked 6 rock-solid, well-run companies they believe you need to be watching. Get the names and stock symbols right now in a FREE report from The Motley Fool. We'll add the first ticker to your personal My Watchlist, a FREE service that gives you the latest news on the companies that matter most to you. For instant access to your free report, simply enter your email address here:

Best Buy, Paychex, and UnitedHealth are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Best Buy and UnitedHealth are Motley Fool Stock Advisor choices. Paychex is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. The Fool owns shares of and has written puts on Oracle, and also owns shares of Best Buy and UnitedHealth. Try any of our investing newsletter services free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Paychex. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2010, at 12:04 PM, JoeSage wrote:

    What an inane article! Please, don't insult my intelligence with this drivel.

    There are valid considerations in weighing the advantages and disadvantages of an IRA (Roth or traditional) compared to alternative investments.

    While a Roth builds tax free, it is funded with tax paid funds. Depending on your state, you could be looking at a pre-tax cost of 150 percent or more of the investment amount. If I am able to defer taxes until retirement, there is the possibility taxes won't be collected until I'm in a lower federal tax bracket -- and a lower tax state.

    What if I need to borrow money to fund my Roth, is it worth it? Or what if I need to sell stock that has a cost-basis of 1/10th the current market value? No investment decision is so black or white as implied by this vacuous puff piece.

    Additionally, IRAs shelter income, but some tax shelters can reduce taxable income. If I'm facing the choice of putting $10K/year into a Roth or putting that $10K/year into payments on additional farmland (or a better vacation rental), what are some of the tax considerations?

    While Roth IRA distributions will likely retain their tax-free status, what are the risks that they will negatively impact the amount I receive under Social Security when I retire in 20 years? Or increase my share of payments under Medicare?

    What if I already have $5 million in retirement savings? Maybe I should live a little and take a vacation to Hawaii!

    A superficial article such as this one (who is the audience for this article?) is a disservice to your regular readers.

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2010, at 12:32 PM, RickGTOC wrote:

    I quit reading after the example that began suggesting that someone with $60,000 income in the 25% bracket would pay $15,000 in taxes. $60K taxable is in the 25% tax bracket, but total tax owed would be far less that $15,000, even if we're talking $60,000 taxable income. That's a characteristic of a graduated tax system. Assuming taxable of $60K filing single (worst case), tax owed is a a little over $11,000. If your talking $60K W-2 income, federal taxes would be far less and may well be below the 25% bracket.

    Quit hyping and do a little research and then write an educational article.

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2010, at 1:35 PM, FoolInFL wrote:

    I just LOVE sarcasm!

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Stocklovr wrote:

    "You don't want to lower your taxable income

    Perhaps you're perfectly happy paying a bigger slice of your income to Uncle Sam. If you make $60,000, and you're looking at a 25% tax rate, you'll only have to pay around $15,000 -- big deal!"

    If you look at the current maximum tax rates, you'll see that we are at historic lows. Back in 1912-13 when income taxes were invented by congress, they were supposed be a maximum of 7% and apply to only the wealthiest individuals (sound familiar - how's that working out for ya?). Look at periods around WWI and WW2 and you see 90% plus brackets. Look too at the baby boomer years. (Ref. Ed Slott's Stay Rich for Life has an excellent table).

    Fact is that not only are we at historic lows but they are not going to stay there. Someone has to pay for the massive spendng in Washington - most likely with tax increases and reduced Social Security benefits.

    So... if you think taxes are going to be lower in retirement and therefore want to shelter your money until the government can get more of it, more power to you.

    This is just an alternate view. Opinions wil vary.

    I'm planning on converting my traditional IRA to a Roth this year. I want to "pay off my partner" (Uncle Sam), because all the tax deferred money is just that. Tax deferred and we have know idea how bad the tax rates will be in the future. I'm going to minimze my risk and get the government out of as much of my savings as i can.

    The risk, of course, is that taxes stay low. I just don't see any way that's gonna happen.

    As I said... just an alternate view.

    -Slvr

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1145564, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2012 2:26:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,910.48 26.53 0.21%
S&P 500 1,353.26 3.30 0.24%
NASD 2,928.14 12.28 0.42%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 2:05 PM
PAYX $31.67 Up +0.02 +0.08%
Paychex, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
POT $46.02 Down -0.44 -0.95%
PotashCorp CAPS Rating: ****
UNH $53.35 Up +1.21 +2.32%
UnitedHealth Group CAPS Rating: *****
ORCL $28.78 Up +0.05 +0.16%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
BBY $25.28 Down -0.13 -0.49%
Best Buy CAPS Rating: **
CSCO $20.16 Down -0.27 -1.32%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****
EMC $26.37 Up +0.04 +0.15%
EMC Corp CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement