Netflix Needs More Than New Streaming Subscribers

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Of the many miscues Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) CEO Reed Hastings and the team have made over the past nine months, perhaps the biggest was the full-on blitz to focus the company's efforts solely on growing the streaming subscriber customer base. If there were any questions regarding the plans Netflix had for its once profitable and pleasantly entrenched DVD customers, Reed himself put those to rest when he was quoted during a conference call in January, "We expect DVD subscribers to decline steadily every quarter, forever." That pretty much says it.

The streaming problem
The move to streaming content delivery, with the explosive growth of mobile computing, makes sense; the tropical storm-like winds are certainly blowing in that direction. The problem wasn't the decision to make the shift; that was a no-brainer. The problem for Netflix was: Why such a radical change so soon? Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is rarely a good idea, and in this case the little tyke was the ridiculously high-margin DVD business.

Reed's first-quarter letter to shareholders continued what is an ongoing trend: shouting from the hilltops about all the new (streaming) subscribers the company brought in. According to Reed, there were 3 million new customers In Q1, and that's a lot. But here's the thing: With all that subscriber growth, the streaming segment lost $36 million for the quarter, primarily because of international results (more on that shortly) and the mere 13.2% margins the domestic business generates.

The virtually forgotten DVD business? Not surprisingly, the segment lost more than a million subscribers; hey, people know when they're not loved. But the 10 million remaining DVD subscribers generated a profit of $146 million in the quarter. Want a side-by-side comparison? Domestically, there were a total of 22.2 million paid streaming subscribers the end of Q1, more than twice the shunned DVD folk. Even with that disparity, the streamers couldn't atone for the 45.6% profit margins the DVD subscribers generated.

Unfortunately for investors thinking there may be opportunity for some bottom fishing as the Netflix share price hovers near 52-week lows, razor-thin margins aren't the only concern.

International expansion
You'll recall it was just over six months ago that Reed and the crew announced, with the appropriate amount of fanfare, the company's expansion into Ireland and the U.K. The stock proceeded to jump about 14% the day of the announcement, trading nearly 4 times the average shares; Netflix was going big time. What seemed to have gotten lost in all the hoopla were the potential problems of running up against two entrenched players:'s (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) Lovefilm and the biggest of the big boys, BSkyB. As usual, Reed pooh-poohed the notion of competition, essentially saying, "Don't you know who we are?" Fool writer Rick Aristotle Munarriz wrote a great article about the Netflix foray and describes in more detail what's happened across the pond since the expansion.

As discussed in previous articles, and reinforced by the U.K./Ireland fiasco, Netflix operated for years domestically with no direct competition and got a bit full of itself. As with any new business, build it and they (competition) will come -- and they did. But as with the scoffing of Amazon and BSkyB, Netflix didn't seem to think it would matter. An example? Reed's quote from January that "we don't do them favors and they don't do us favors," in reference to Warner Bros. and a tiff about a 56-day waiting period, reeks of a CEO with a relatively up-and-coming company that's a little too full of himself. Hey, it's Warner Bros., for goodness' sake. Don't need to kowtow to them, but c'mon.

In the past six months alone, some big players have started making noise in the Netflix arena. Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) poaching of Hollywood talent for its YouTube offering is a pretty clear indication that it means content business. Then there's the joint venture between Redbox kiosk owner Coinstar (Nasdaq: CSTR  ) and wireless leader Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) . They finally gave us a few details about the partnership, which will include both streaming and traditional DVD rental alternatives. And it shouldn't be long before more cable companies join Comcast in offering similar services.

The timing off the jump to streaming hyperspace for Netflix, in conjunction with an expense-ridden international expansion plan, was ill-conceived. Then to add insult to shareholder injury, these major shifts were made while alienating the company's money-making cash cow -- DVD subscribers. Successfully shifting business models is all about timing, and Netflix was off, on several fronts.

You may not consider companies that offer cutting-edge technology or new ways of conducting business as sound, long-term investment opportunities, but they're out there. For a few of the best ideas around, take a look at the Fool's free special report: "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich." In it, we outline some of our analysts' top picks for the long term, and you can find out just who they are.

Fool contributor Tim Brugger currently holds no securities positions, including any mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of, Netflix, and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of, Netflix, Coinstar, and Google. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 01, 2012, at 9:03 PM, tfmsview wrote:

    When Netflix first change price I put my membership on hold and tried Hulu plus. Hulu plus is not a competitor and I didn't even except the free second week they offered, and I went out and bought Netflix stock. I was a 70% gainer when I sold at $120.

    I bought again on the way down to the present price but I'm not sure why. The fact is I miss the two or three DVD's a month I got with the combined service. I don't pay for cable or dish so you can imagine my family of 8 watches a lot of the streaming video but there are a couple of new releases a month we'd like to see. So we end up going to Redbox a couple times a month. I think Netflix would have done a lot better if they had just tried to raise the lowest plan a couple of dollars and not given that money to Redbox.

    Couple more thoughts - I like watching the national news somewhere between 9 and 10 pm eastern. Right now I can do it by going to my computer but it would be easier if Netflix would get a contract with PBS to run newshour every night.

    Also, I bet they could be a king maker for currently lower watched sports. I'll bet if they could get 1/2 day old European or South American soccer games they would have amazing viewership.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2012, at 1:38 PM, 48ozhalfgallons wrote:

    I dumped my streaming service 2 months ago. Don't miss it at all. Love the DVD service.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Quaker08 wrote:

    I like Netflix's new feature, which continues the next episode if you are watching a series. Now I don't have to find the remote when I want to watch 6 straight hours of Lost. I think this resonates with the American consumer.... It's the little things.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1929847, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2016 11:42:33 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:00 PM
NFLX $127.50 Up +4.15 +3.36%
Netflix CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $818.99 Up +8.67 +1.07% CAPS Rating: ****
GOOGL $824.06 Up +2.43 +0.30%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
OUTR $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Outerwall CAPS Rating: **
VZ $48.20 Down -0.94 -1.91%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****