Is Stratasys, Ltd. Printing Pain for Current Investors?

One of the country's leading 3-D printers is down big. Is it time to cut it loose?

Apr 24, 2014 at 2:10PM

Could the go-go days for investors in 3-D printing be coming to an end?

During 2014 alone, some of the sector's biggest names have lost well over one-third of their value. One 3-D printing stock that I personally hold a number of shares of is Stratasys, Ltd. (NASDAQ:SSYS), which is 25% off its yearlong highs.

With such a drop, it's worth asking the question: Has the time come to part ways with Stratasys?

Screen Shot

Source: MakerBot 

Every year, around springtime, I review all of my holdings to see whether or not they are still worth keeping. Because I'm loath to ever sell a stock, I take on the most salient, but general, arguments that bears raise against a company's stock.

Currently, Stratasys accounts for 3.5% of my real-life holdings. Let's take a look at the two biggest arguments against owning the stock, and see how I feel about those reasons.

There are a lot of competitors and no way to predict the industry's future
Indeed, the 3-D printing space has become quite crowded. While just a few years ago, 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Stratasys were the only names of note, a number of smaller players had announced IPOs during the past two years.

And that doesn't even count the number of private companies that are vying for customers as well. For instance, just this month at the Inside 3-D Printing expo in New York City, XYZPrinting -- a subsidiary of Taiwan's Kinpo Group -- showed off its da Vinci 2.1 printer that would be selling for $150 less than 3D Systems' Cube, and less than half of Stratasys' MakerBot Replicator 2.

That, plus the expiration of patents on some consumables -- which generate high margins for Stratasys -- could combine to drive profitability down in the long run.

Furthermore, the idea that there'll ever be a 3-D printer in every household is farfetched and misses the fact that consumer printers simply don't offer that much utility for the average Joe.

My take is that these are fair concerns for the consumer division, but Stratasys is diversified.
There's little question in my mind that, over time, margins are going to come down in the consumer 3-D printing world. If the dream of a "printer in every house" ever comes true, prices and margins will simply have to come down.

But Stratasys is much more than just a consumer 3-D printing company. As it is, its consumer-focuced MakerBot accounted for just 16% of revenue during the fourth quarter of 2013. The merger with Objet gave Stratasys exposure to a much broader range of automotive, medical, and electronics players. And before either of these mergers ever occurred, sales of Stratasys' Fortus line of industrial printers were increasing at a rapid pace.

The utility of 3-D printers in the corporate and industrial fields is much higher, and Stratasys will likely earn higher margins and benefit from its first-mover advantage as well.

In addition, the company recently acquired privately held Solid Concepts and Harvest Technologies, which will help boost Stratasys' Red Eye business. Customers, typically in the automotive, aerospace, or medical fields, use Red Eye to 3-D print things when they don't have a 3-D printer to do it themselves.  

Because these printers can be prohibitively expensive, Red Eye represents a great way for Stratasys to offer a taste of what its industrial printers can do, without having to make such a large up-front payment.  


An example of the type of printing Red Eye can produce for customers. Photo: The Motley Fool

Suffice it to say that while consumer exposure is a nice bonus, I'm invested in Stratasys for its diversity across many fields. 

The stock is simply too expensive
Again, there's a lot of truth to this concern. As of this writing, Stratasys trades for about 57 times earnings and didn't produce positive free cash flow during the past year.

Even after the recent sell-off, Stratasys' stock is up a monstrous 1,000% over the past five years. Investors who get in now are making the classic mistake of "buying high", and will suffer muted returns in the years to come because of this inflated price.

I'm of the opinion that one shouldn't anchor an investing decision on a past price. What the line of thinking mentioned above ignores is that there's a reason behind these moves. Last quarter, the company grew overall revenue by 62%, and organic growth clocked in at 36%. It's likely that we're in the beginning stages of a steep adoption curve for 3-D printing, and growth may start accelerating.

Unlike 3D Systems, Stratasys has had a much more restrained approach to acquisitions -- MakerBot and Objet are the two big splashes of note. Such acquisitions are tough, and I'm a fan of Stratasys' approach of calculated moves. These acquisitions could add a ton of value over the years.

But possibly the most instructive exercise for investors would be to look at Stratasys' $5 billion market cap right now and ask themselves if they really think that's the roof for the company. In my opinion, as the leader in the field and a healthy balance sheet to fund future initiatives, Stratasys could easily be a multi-bagger over the next decade.

You don't want to miss this special free report about 3-D printing
The Economist compares 3-D printing to the steam engine and the printing press. Business Insider says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." And everyone from BMW, to Nike, to the U.S. Air Force is already using it every day. Watch The Motley Fool's shocking video presentation today to discover how this technology will put an end to the "Made In China" era... and learn the investing strategy we've used to double our money on these three stocks.  I personally own two of them, and they make up 4% of my real-life holdings. Click here to watch now!

Brian Stoffel owns shares of 3D Systems and Stratasys. The Motley Fool recommends 3D Systems and Stratasys. The Motley Fool owns shares of 3D Systems and Stratasys. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information