Netflix Does a Bad Deal With Verizon

After Comcast, Netflix deals with Verizon to improve viewing performance.

Apr 29, 2014 at 10:15AM

Stocks are slightly higher in morning trading as the Federal Reserve begins its two-day April monetary policy meeting. The benchmark S&P 500 and the narrower Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) were up 0.32% and 0.40%, respectively, at 10:15 a.m. EDT. As always, financial journalists and analysts will parse the tea leaves of the Fed's statement tomorrow, but expect the central bank to continue on its now-standard course of ratcheting down securities purchases by another $10 billion per month.

In this morning's company-specific news, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) has reached an agreement with Verizon (NYSE:VZ) to improve the viewing experience for its customers. Meanwhile, another Internet service provider, Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA), will divest 3.9 million customers in a $20 billion deal with Carter Communications in order to obtain regulatory approval for a larger, strategic deal: Comcast's proposed $41 billion tie-up with Time Warner Cable -- a deal that Netflix publicly opposes.


Streaming television and movie provider Netflix has agreed to pay Verizon an interconnection fee in order to speed up performance for its users; the deal is similar to the agreement it put together with Comcast in February. In both cases, terms were not disclosed publicly, but the latter deal is already paying off -- for Netflix's customers, at any rate. According to The Wall Street Journal, "the company's own traffic data showed a sharp performance jump for Comcast subscribers after the two networks reached a deal."

Netflix is an enormous source of Internet use, representing as much as 30% of peak residential traffic; as such, the company is locked into a debate over who ought to pay for the infrastructure required to handle that traffic to ensure it meets broadband speed standards. In a blog post from March 20, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings argued that the requests for video data emanate from users who are already paying handsomely for their broadband Internet service, so cost sharing makes no sense for Netflix without the other side of the coin: revenue sharing. Netflix opposes the interconnection fees it is now paying, but feels it has no choice in order to ensure its customers enjoy a high-quality service.

As such, Netflix opposes Comcast's proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable. Hastings took the opportunity to highlight that opposition in his quarterly letter to Netflix shareholders on April 21:

The Internet faces a long term threat from the largest ISPs driving up profits for themselves and costs for everyone else as detailed in our recent blog post.

If the Comcast and Time Warner Cable merger is approved, the combined company's footprint will pass over 60 percent1 of U.S. broadband households, after the proposed divestiture, with most of those homes having Comcast as the only option for truly high-speed broadband (>10Mbps). As DSL fades in favor of cable Internet, Comcast could control high-speed broadband to the majority of American homes. Comcast is already dominant enough to be able to capture unprecedented fees from transit providers and services such as Netflix. The combined company would possess even more anticompetitive leverage to charge arbitrary interconnection tolls for access to their customers. For this reason, Netflix opposes this merger.

I tend to agree with Hastings here (full disclosure: As a customer of both Comcast for broadband Internet access and Netflix, I find the former service barely tolerable, while I'm delighted with the latter). I think Comcast's offer to divest 3.9 million users ought not to influence regulators as they review the tie-up with Time Warner Cable -- it's insignificant.

Alex Dumortier, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers