These 3 Stocks Dragged the Dow Jones Down the Most in 2014

It doesn't always happen, but the Dow's highest-priced stocks have been its worst performers so far this year, and it's holding the the index back compared to the S&P.

Jul 2, 2014 at 12:00PM

The appeal of stock indices is their ability to serve as guides to the market's daily gyrations. Many track hundreds or even thousands of stocks, but the most famous index of all -- the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) -- keeps it simple, with a slim list of 30 companies representing the best of American industry. That makes the Dow easier to follow, but it can also make it easier for a single stock to push the blue-chip index around, especially if that company has one of the higher share prices of the Dow's components.

With the first six months of 2014 in the rearview mirror, we can now see just which stocks have hurt the Dow most. This is a little more complex than simply pointing out which stocks have fallen farthest in the past six months, since the Dow's price-weighting structure will result in larger moves when a stock trading at triple-digit prices goes wild. To illustrate how this works, let's look at the Dow's three worst-performing stocks for the first half of 2014:

^DJI Chart

^DJI data by YCharts.

This year, the Dow's three biggest losers have also been the biggest drag on the index's progress. That doesn't always happen, but when the Dow's top losers also happen to have some of the highest share prices of all 30 components, the downward pull can be powerful. To put this in perspective, the S&P 500 has performed more than twice as well as the Dow this year, as no one component has as great an impact on that index as Boeing (NYSE:BA), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), and Visa (NYSE:V) have on the Dow. The largest S&P component has a weight of 3.2%, but Boeing, which has the lowest share price of this year's three worst-performing Dow components, has an index weight of 4.9%. The three worst Dow stocks for the first half of 2014 accounted for more than 19% of the index's momentum this year!

It's easy enough to see which stocks were the Dow's biggest drags, but we should look a little deeper to figure out why they were so weak, and possibly determine if they'll continue to be anchors around the index's neck for the second half of 2014.

Third-biggest drag: Boeing (reduced the Dow's growth by 0.3% in the first half)
Boeing strung together the strongest performance of any Dow stock last year, nearly doubling its share price and far surpassing the index's second-best gainer. It shouldn't be too surprising that the aerospace giant slipped from its perch, particularly as it has booked far fewer orders for new aircraft during the first half of 2014 than it did for the same stretch in 2013. Part of this slowdown is no doubt due to the fact that orders spiked last year after Boeing successfully ironed out the known defects in its next-generation 787 Dreamliner jets. Nonetheless, last year's big bounce also boosted Boeing's P/E to its highest levels since 2010, and it currently leads its fellow defense contractors by a wide margin in valuation terms.

Boeing continues to ride what it hopes will become a veritable tidal wave of airline growth, as the company projects $4.8 trillion in new airplane demand over the next two decades. However, that doesn't mean the stock is a bargain right now, and as long as investors look elsewhere for value it's likely that Boeing will continue to suffer the hangover from last year's outsized pop. This reversal of fortune has taken Boeing from first last year to worst for the first half of 2014 in terms of gains among the Dow's components, but since it's only the sixth-largest component by weight, it doesn't hold the index down quite as much as these next two losers.

Second-biggest drag: Goldman Sachs (reduced the Dow's growth by 0.3% in the first half)
Goldman Sachs narrowly edged Boeing with a 0.31% drag on the Dow for the first half, compared to the airplane builder's 0.28% damage to Dow gains. This is primarily due to Goldman's larger share price, which gives it the Dow's third-largest weighting.

Goldman has been one of the Dow's biggest drags since it was added to the index nearly a year ago, but its fundamentals haven't exactly justified any significant share-price growth -- trailing 12-month earnings per share have barely grown over the past year, and revenue has dwindled a bit, as the investment bank's progress seems to have flatlined after a strong rebound from its early post-recession woes. The problem seems to stem from an ongoing decline in fixed-income trading volume, which has long been one of Goldman's most reliable sources of revenue -- the bank ranked first in revenue from both equity trading and proprietary trading among all American banks last year. This could improve in the future, but it may not be enough to change abysmal investor perceptions of the "Vampire Squid" relative to its none-too-pristine American banking peers.


Investors don't want Visa in 2014.

Biggest drag on the Dow: Visa (reduced growth by 0.4% in the first half)
The world's biggest credit card issuer is also the Dow's largest component by weight despite being only the 17th-largest Dow component by market cap. It's the only component to currently boast a share price above $200, which earned it a weighting of 8% at the end of the first half. Unfortunately for Dow-watchers, Visa's 5% decline in the first half was also the second-worst performance of all 30 components. Like Boeing, this underperformance followed excellent growth in 2013 that saw Visa's share price grow by nearly 50% -- with 12% tacked on in the three and a half months following its inclusion on the Dow last September.

Visa's had a lousy first half despite putting together respectable growth through the end of the first quarter. Reduced guidance and a maelstrom of potential threats have changed investor perceptions toward the company -- many no longer look at the payment processor as the undisputed master of its domain, but as an aging king in a crumbling castle. That might not reflect reality, but perception matters when it comes to stocks. Until investors can again see Visa as a dominant force in the financial world, it's likely to exert an outsized negative influence of the Dow.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Alex Planes holds no financial position in any company mentioned here. Add him on Google+ or follow him on Twitter @TMFBiggles for more insight into markets, history, and technology.

The Motley Fool recommends Goldman Sachs and Visa. The Motley Fool owns shares of Visa. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.

Compare Brokers