2 Reasons Rupert Murdoch Wants to Own Time Warner

Time Warner rejects an unsolicited offer from Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox.

Jul 16, 2014 at 7:00PM

Just the whiff of a potential media megamerger between Twenty-First Century Fox and Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) (more on that in a moment) contributed to pushing U.S. stocks on Wednesday, with the benchmark S&P 500 rising 0.4%, putting within two-tenths of a percentage point of the record high achieved at the beginning of the month. The narrower Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) did set a new high on an 0.5% gain, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) was up just 0.2%.


In a press release today, Time Warner informed its shareholders that it has rejected a cash-and-stock offer from Rupert Murdoch's Twenty-First Century Fox. Time Warner also published a video on YouTube featuring chairman and CEO Jeff Bewkes, who explains why they rejected the Fox offer. (It's a media company, after all!) In response to the news, shares of Time Warner gained 17% to close at $83.13, a 1% discount to the value of Twenty-First Century Fox's offer based on today's closing price of Fox shares.

According to Time Warner's statement, Fox proposed to pay shareholders a combination of 1.531 shares of Fox Class A non-voting stock and $32.42 in cash for every share of Time Warner. Based on Tuesday's closing prices -- the last day before Fox's approach became public knowledge -- the offer was worth $84.70 per share, valuing Time Warner at nearly $75 billion.

So what does Murdoch expect to get from Time Warner in exchange for such a sum? Broadly speaking, I see two themes driving this deal.

First is scale. The combination of Fox and Time Warner would create a powerhouse in live sports broadcasting, for example, bringing together Time Warner's rights to the NBA and NCAA basketball, MLB, and professional golf to those of Fox covering the NFL, NASCAR, and the next two soccer World Cups. Sports are a key segment of television programming, because they are the last form of content that viewers absolutely want to watch live.

In movie-making, Warner Brothers and 20th Century Fox studios accounted together for a quarter of all North American box office receipts last year. Owning both would help smooth out the volatility in profits in a business that is notoriously hit-or-miss from one year to the next.

More generally, scale would help Fox maintain (or increase) its bargaining power with cable companies in a shifting media landscape; in that regard, Comcast's takeover of Time Warner Cable is a landmark deal.

The second driver is growth. According to a story from Bloomberg News, one of Murdoch's main motivations to do this deal is the pursuit of a crown jewel: HBO, Time Warner's highly regarded premium cable channel, which Fox reportedly values at $20 billion on a stand-alone basis. Murdoch apparently views HBO as the main legitimate competitor for Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), the streaming video and television content provider that is reshaping the way content is distributed and produced. Netflix, which has a market value of $26.6 billion, overtook HBO in terms of paid U.S. subscribers in the third quarter of last year, but it still lags behind HBO globally.

The stock price action in Time Warner suggests the market believes this story is still unfolding. We know from past experience that Rupert Murdoch is dogged in the pursuit of a corporate prey he really wants to acquire. Expect a better offer to be forthcoming.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple


Alex Dumortier, CFA, has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple, Google (A and C shares), and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers