quote.fool.comToday's FeaturesQuotes, News, Charts, Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
Free Home Delivery!

Cash-King Port

The Cash King Portfolio has been renamed the Rule Maker Portfolio.

Report
Archives
Information
Messages
Companies Messages

11 Steps:
 1: Philosophy
 2: Mastering Finances
 3: Allocating Savings
 4: Finding Ideas
 5: Getting Information
 6: Cash-King Criteria
 7: QuaVa & Flow
 8: Ownership
 9: Putting It Together
10: Retirement
11: Getting Answers

What's our next portfolio pick? Our trade alerts let you know when the Fool makes a move. Read about our Fool PortTracker too.

Related Items

• Hall of Portfolios
• Rule Breaker Port
• Rule Maker Port
• Boring Port
• Drip Port
• Foolish Four Port
• Harry Jones


Tellabs and Ciena

by Phil Weiss
(pweiss@homemail.com)

TOWACO, NJ (Sept. 11, 1998) - Last night, Al Levit shared some thoughts on his dumbest investment. Tonight, we're going to take a tag team type approach as I finish off this discussion.

Unlike Al, I didn't sell a stock in order to buy stock in Tellabs (Nasdaq: TLAB). I just purchased it as part of my regular strategy of adding new money to the market throughout the year. The vast majority of my purchases this year have been of Cash-Kings. My purchase of Tellabs was one of my rare ventures this year into the land of Cash-Princes that I thought had the potential to become Cash-Kings. However, I could have just as easily purchased the same stock (Dell) that Al sold to raise money for his Tellabs purchase.

Like Al, I believe that it's important to have a good quality telecommunication stock or two in my portfolio. When I looked at the numbers, Tellabs looked like a real winner. The only one of the numerical Cash-King criteria in which it fell a little short of our target levels was its Flow Ratio. However, as of the end of the first quarter, this number, which had been trending down, was 1.55. Since the company also had no debt, I was comfortable with the Flow Ratio at that level, especially in light of its downward trend. However, I also knew that it was something that I would have to keep an eye on in the future.

I then read through the sections of Tellabs' 10K (available from http://quote.fool.com) that I find to be most relevant to make sure I had an understanding of its business and the related risks and opportunities. I decided to purchase an initial stake in the business that amounted to less than 5% of my stock portfolio. Not long after I purchased shares the stock started to increase in price rather rapidly. Second quarter earnings were released, and they easily surpassed expectations. Before I knew it I was up around 35% on this stock.

My first concerns came about when I went through what was viewed by the financial media as a great earnings report in a little more detail. The Flow Ratio had increased from 1.55 to 2.01. I looked at its components and, initially, I was confused by what I found. After I figured out what had happened, I started a thread on the topic on the Cash-King Strategies Board. The first message in this discussion can be found by clicking right here.

Here's a summary of what I concluded about the change in Tellabs' Flow Ratio: The component of the ratio that actually changed the most was the decrease in current liabilities. The current liability that decreased the most was accrued liabilities. Since that's the case, maybe the low Flow Ratio was a bit misleading in the first place. Accruals being what they are, I hate to think that the presence of accrued liabilities on the balance sheet supported the lower Flow Ratio.

All of this left me a bit uneasy about the rather dramatic change in Tellabs' Flow Ratio. So, I decided that I would continue to keep a close watch on this ratio, but I continued to hold the stock. What I may not have given full consideration to at that time was whether or not the change in Tellabs' Flow Ratio could in some ways have been a foreshadowing of what was to come. I say this even though the precipitous drop in Tellabs' share price coincides with problems that Tellabs' prospective merger partner Ciena (Nasdaq: CIEN) has had.

But, the Flow Ratio is also one of the tools that we use to evaluate management, so its increase could be viewed as a possible sign that other troubles were on the way. I say this because I do not think that Tellabs management has done a very good job in managing the combination with Ciena.

Initially, the merger with Ciena looked like a great business decision; however, it has gone VERY badly so far. The reasons for this merger were primarily related to the fact that Ciena has some very successful products that use optical fiber, but they have been unable to reach as much of the market as they would like with these products. One of Tellabs biggest strengths is its well-respected sales force. It was thought that it could significantly expand the market for Ciena's products.

After it was learned that Ciena would be losing a potential source of revenue in 1999 from AT&T (NYSE: T), the original deal was renegotiated from a 1:1 to a 5:4 stock swap. This resulted in a decrease in the value being paid for Ciena from nearly $7 billion to approximately $4 billion. (Note that as of Thursday, Ciena's market cap was down to under $2 billion).

When the parties agreed to reduce the exchange ratio in the merger, they held a conference call that I listened to with interest. I have to say that I was not left with a warm and fuzzy feeling after listening to the call. The thing that I was most uncomfortable with was that Tellabs' representative on the call (I believe it was its CFO) didn't seem to be able to quantify many of the analysts questions related to what types of savings and revenue benefits would result from the merger. He often answered with responses along the lines of "we haven't quantified that yet," or "I'm not sure."

Listening to the call left me with some doubts about the quality of the due diligence efforts of Tellabs in the transaction. The apparent surprise in reaction to each piece of bad news that Ciena has announced has forced me to start questioning the quality of Tellabs' management. After all, we've seen what's happened to the stock price of Cendant (NYSE: CD) as a result of its improper due diligence when it acquired CUC.

Wednesday we learned that Ciena had lost more business to a competitor. Once again Ciena claimed that this business loss was not significant. Yet, the value of the contract that Ciena lost was $100 million over the course of 3 years. Ciena's revenue over the last 12 months is $521 million. If the $100 million were to be paid equally over the next 3 years it would still amount to 6-7% of Ciena's current revenue base. This does not seem like a totally insignificant event to me, especially when there has been no information provided yet backing up Ciena's claim that the revenue it lost from AT&T would be replaced.

In light of the market's behavior on Wednesday and Thursday of this week and Tellabs relatively strong performance compared to that of Ciena, it seems to me that the market believes that this deal won't happen. Although I thought Ciena 's product line filled an important niche for Tellabs, I'm no longer certain that I want to get in bed with the "mess" that Ciena seems to be.

The closing of the merger has now been delayed until November to give the SEC and shareholders sufficient time to study the revised situation. There is speculation that this uncertainty is holding the price of Tellabs down in the interim. I know that at this point I will not be all that upset if the merger is put on hold, restructured into some type of joint venture or called off altogether until Tellabs has a full understanding of what they are buying -- at this point I just don't believe that they do.

Maybe the moral of this is that the significant downdraft in Tellabs' Flowie was more of a signal that the company's management was not doing as good a job at managing its business than I had thought originally. Now, I certainly don't like losing money, but the one good thing about all this is that sometimes we can learn even more from our mistakes than our successes. So, if this really does end up being a bad investment over the long term, then I'll do my best to take the knowledge I've gained from it and use it to my benefit in the future.

I'll be back next week with a full week of reports. I hope y'all have a Foolish weekend.

Phil Weiss

Cash-King Strategy Folder
Cash-King Companies Folder


09/11/98 Close
Stock  Change    Bid 
 AXP   +9 5/8   79.25 
 CHV   +2 1/2   82.50 
 CSCO  +4 5/16  92.75 
 KO    +1 9/16  62.44 
 GPS   +  3/8   59.75 
 EK    -1       78.00 
 XON   +  7/8   70.56 
 GM    +  13/16 56.44 
 INTC  +5 7/8   84.94 
 MSFT  +3 1/2   104.25 
 PFE   +6 1/8   100.50 
 SGP   +4 1/8   94.63 
 TROW  +1       27.75 
 

 
              Day      Month       Year       History 
 C-K          4.01%     6.65%      5.10%       5.10%  
 S&P 500      2.94%     5.38%      0.30%       0.30%  
 Nasdaq       3.55%     9.50%     (1.48%)     (1.48%) 
  
 Cash-King Stocks 
  
     Rec'd    #  Security     In At       Now    Change 
     2/3/98   24 Microsoft     78.27    104.25    33.19% 
     2/3/98   22 Pfizer        82.30    100.50    22.12% 
     5/1/98   37 Gap Inc.      51.09     59.75    16.95% 
    6/23/98   23 Cisco Syst    86.35     92.75     7.42% 
    2/13/98   22 Intel         84.67     84.94     0.31% 
    8/21/98   22 Schering P    95.99     94.63    -1.42% 
    2/27/98   27 Coca-Cola     69.11     62.44    -9.65% 
     2/6/98   56 T. Rowe Pr    33.67     27.75   -17.59% 
    5/26/98   18 AmExpress    104.07     79.25   -23.85% 
  
 Foolish Four Stocks 
  
     Rec'd    #  Security     In At     Value    Change 
    3/12/98   20 Eastman Ko    63.15     78.00    23.52% 
    3/12/98   20 Exxon         64.34     70.56     9.68% 
    3/12/98   15 Chevron       83.34     82.50    -1.01% 
    3/12/98   17 General Mo    72.41     56.44   -22.05% 
  
 Cash-King Stocks 
  
     Rec'd    #  Security     In At     Value    Change 
     2/3/98   24 Microsoft   1878.45   2502.00   $623.55 
     2/3/98   22 Pfizer      1810.58   2211.00   $400.42 
     5/1/98   37 Gap Inc.    1890.33   2210.75   $320.42 
    6/23/98   23 Cisco Syst  1985.95   2133.25   $147.30 
    2/13/98   22 Intel       1862.83   1868.63     $5.80 
    8/21/98   22 Schering P   2111.7   2081.75   -$29.95 
    2/27/98   27 Coca-Cola   1865.89   1685.81  -$180.08 
     2/6/98   56 T. Rowe Pr  1885.70   1554.00  -$331.70 
    5/26/98   18 AmExpress   1873.20   1426.50  -$446.70 
  
 Foolish Four Stocks 
  
     Rec'd    #  Security     In At     Value    Change 
    3/12/98   20 Eastman Ko  1262.95   1560.00   $297.05 
    3/12/98   20 Exxon       1286.70   1411.25   $124.55 
    3/12/98   15 Chevron     1250.14   1237.50   -$12.64 
    3/12/98   17 General Mo  1230.89    959.44  -$271.45 
  
                               CASH     $48.07 
                              TOTAL  $22889.95 
   
 *Please note: On 8/4/98 $2,000 cash was added to the
portfolio for future investment. This will be reflected
in the numbers as soon as possible.

*The year for the S&P and Nasdaq will be as of 02/03/98

</THE CASH-KING PORTFOLIO>

Are you a Foolish investor?
The Motley Fool Recommends...
Industry Snapshot
New format! A stock idea, industry overview, top players, and financials -- every two weeks! Get more info or order.

ValuTool 2.0
You give it the data, and it does the rest: PEG & Foolish 8 valuations, ratio valuations, and lots more. Get more info or order.

Foolish Eight Stock Screen
Here at Last! Foolish Eight Stock Screen. Get more info or order.
Other Fool Products...
Subscriptions
Primers
Reports
Investing Tools
Books
Fool Gear

Shop FoolMart!

 

  home  | news  | specials  | strategies  | personal finance  | school  | help  

© Copyright 1995-2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool. The Motley Fool is a registered trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us