Getting to Know a Company

Format for Printing

Format for printing

Request Reprints


By George L. Smyth
April 25, 2000

It is enjoyable to evaluate companies when a serious purchase is under consideration. For me, the comparison aspect is only the first part of the process. The other part of the process is to ensure that I select a company that I respect and of which I wish to take an active part.

This thinking may be contrary to the idea of making as much money in as short a time as possible, but if I am selecting a company to which I will be making regular purchases over the following decade, this becomes important to me.

After making my decision, I attempt to learn even more about the company, as would any part owner. Make no mistake about it, as a shareholder, part owner is exactly the role one takes. Therefore, it makes sense to get intimate with the company.

One means of doing this is to attend the yearly shareholders meeting. Unfortunately, few of us can do this, as the meeting location is seldom close to where we live. My advantage is that Wilmington, Delaware -- where Coke holds its meeting each year -- is a mere 100 miles north of me. This allows me to take a day of leave from work and attend.

One can use the visit as a learning process in understanding how the company operates. My first Coke shareholders meeting was in 1998, not long after Roberto Goizueta's passing and the reigns had been passed to Douglas Ivester. At that time Coke's stock value was reaching its high and this fact was reflected at the meeting. All comments and questions were positive.

Last year, as the Asian economic crisis reared its ugly head, Coke's value had dropped. I wondered if the meeting would take on a negative atmosphere, but few people in the audience worried about this, as the questions posed to Mr. Ivester were very positive. I attributed this to the fact that the majority of shareholders own stock through their Drip, and are more attuned to the long-term aspects of ownership. I entered a report of the meeting on the Coke discussion board after returning.

This year was different.

Coke has had the attention of individuals who are making charges of racial discrimination within the company. In order to address the issue, several rows of seats were set aside for some individuals who had ridden a bus from Atlanta. The meeting started late as everyone awaited the appearance of Jesse Jackson, who sat a row in front of me. The meeting became a sort of diversity workshop, as a minister, a female Coke worker, and Mr. Jackson took the microphone and blasted Coke.

This was also the first time that I had seen anything on the ballot other than the typical confirmation of the board of directors and auditing firm. Items concerning compensation issues, biotechnology, and recycling programs found their way onto the ballot. The last of the three drew the yelling of a protester following its demise, followed by an unsuccessful, halfhearted attempt of four young women to start a chant.

Of course, one never knows whom they'll meet at such a gathering. I heard one Fool during the comment/question portion make the statement that Coke could stream the meeting on the Internet for less than the cost of the catering (certainly, streaming the meeting would make it possible for more shareholders to experience the goings-on of the meeting). Sure enough, I caught up with Rule Maker contributor Rob Landley (TMF Oak) after the meeting and we compared notes about issues in the meeting, disagreed about Microsoft, and talked programming in general. (To read Rob's take on the meeting, visit this Rule Maker article.)

So my education continues as I watch this company. I wonder if the issues that were brought up in the meeting will affect the company as it attempts to find its way back into the favorable graces of the investing public. I wonder if some of them will catch fire and work as a distraction. Without the firsthand, intimate knowledge gained by attending the meeting, I would be completely at the mercy of the media for my information.

If you have the opportunity, I would highly recommend attending such a meeting to learn more about the company that you partially own. You are sure to learn at least something during your experience.

By the way, you may be wondering about the question that I had planned to ask (see last week's column). Due to the amount of time devoted to the diversity issue, questions to the CEO began about the time the meeting would normally have ended. I was one of several people left standing with a question at the time Mr. Daft, CEO, closed the meeting. Pull another feather from the cap.

Drip Portfolio

4/25/2000 Closing Numbers
Ticker Company Day Chg % Chg Price
CPBCAMPBELL SOUP7/83.11%$29.00
INTCINTEL CORP7/87.64%$125.00
JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON7/160.52%$84.31

  Day Week Month Year
To Date
Drip 4.56% 6.04% 2.96% 18.69% 54.20% 17.08%
S&P 500 3.31% 2.97% -1.43% .54% 57.35% 17.95%
S&P 500(DA) 3.31% 2.97% -1.43% .54% 59.97% 18.66%
S&P 500(DCA) n/a n/a n/a n/a 30.12% 10.06%
NASDAQ 6.57% 1.85% -18.84% -8.80% 136.45% 36.80%

Trade Date # Shares Ticker Cost/Share Price LT % Val Chg

Trade Date # Shares Ticker Cost Value LT $ Val Ch
  Cash: $24.47  
  Total: $5,340.35  

• S&P 500 (DA) = dividend adjusted. Dividends have been added to the total return of the index.

Drip Port launched with $500 on July 28, 1997, adds $100 to invest every month, and the goal is to own $150,000 in stock by August of the year 2017. Due to the slow nature of dollar-cost-averaging and our relatively significant starting costs, we do not expect to seriously challenge the S&P 500 for the first three to five years as we build an investment base. The long-term advantages of dollar-cost-averaging still overcome the short-term disadvantages, however. Final note: our investment in Campbell Soup is frozen due to fees instituted in its investment plan. Click here for a history of all Drip Port transactions.