Recs

7

The Right Answer for Your Retirement

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

For years, you've heard how you should have an IRA to help boost your retirement savings. Now, though, the government wants to make IRAs automatic for most workers. If these proposals become law, automatic IRAs could change the way many people save for retirement -- but is it a smart thing for you?

A good idea, mostly
As proposed by Sen. Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico last week, the Automatic IRA Act would require all employers with 10 or more employees to automatically enroll their workers into an IRA if they don't offer an alternative retirement plan, such as a 401(k) plan. Although the law wouldn't force workers to participate, they would have to affirmatively opt out of the program if they didn't want to make IRA contributions.

Here are some of the particulars of the proposed law:

  • The default contribution rate would be 3% of salary.
  • Contributions would be made to a Roth IRA unless a worker chose a traditional IRA instead.
  • The default investment would be a special new type of investment dubbed an "R-Bond" until workers had accumulated $5,000 or more in their IRAs. After that, the default would change to a balanced or life-cycle mutual fund as offered by the IRA provider.
  • Employers would have the option of choosing a provider for all employees or allowing individuals to choose providers on their own.

One definite winner from an automatic IRA law would be the discount brokers that set up IRAs. With Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCHW  ) , E*TRADE (Nasdaq: ETFC  ) , and TD AMERITRADE (Nasdaq: AMTD  ) all battling for position with other brokers in an ultracompetitive financial industry right now, a government-legislated flood of new accounts could be exactly what the doctor ordered.

What about workers, though? Does the law go far enough for them?

Giving workers a push
On its face, the proposed automatic IRA law makes a lot of sense. Doing more to encourage more people to save for retirement is a good idea and long overdue. Participation in employer-sponsored retirement plans is abominable, with just 60% of workers making any contribution at all. More than half of those who do participate contribute 5% or less of their salaries.

That lack of planning shows up in how little most people have saved for retirement. According to a study from the Employee Benefits Research Institute, fewer than half of workers have saved more than $25,000 toward their retirement. Even among those closer to retirement who've had longer to save, less than one in five has saved more than $250,000, a figure that itself probably wouldn't be enough to let anyone retire comfortably.

The better strategy
So it's clear something like Bingaman's proposal is necessary. But in many ways, it doesn't go far enough. A default contribution rate of 3% is far too low for most people to meet their financial needs in retirement. Defaulting to a Roth IRA makes plenty of sense for young, lower-income workers who are in low tax brackets, but older workers with higher incomes might be better off in a traditional IRA.

Perhaps most importantly, using a fixed-income investment option as a default isn't the right strategy for anyone trying to build retirement savings. Most investors need to save aggressively for retirement, and stocks like Hansen Natural (Nasdaq: HANS  ) or Chipotle (NYSE: CMG  ) that have shown a strong history of solid growth and extraordinary returns on invested capital would give them a better chance of getting there than a bond investment. Even for conservative investors, Altria Group (NYSE: MO  ) and AT&T (NYSE: T  ) are among the many high-yielding dividend stocks that tend to react less turbulently even when the overall market is bouncing up and down.

Take control
The government's efforts show how hard it is to push people toward doing the right thing with their money. Even if automatic IRAs are better than nothing, you're still far better off taking responsibility for your own savings and putting together a custom-made plan that works best for your own individual needs.

Need a plan of your own for retirement? The experts at Rule Your Retirement can show you the way, and a 30-day free trial is just a click away.

Tune in every Monday and Wednesday for Dan's columns on retirement, investing, and personal finance.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger is always looking for the answers. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. Chipotle Mexican Grill and Hansen Natural are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Charles Schwab is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. Chipotle Mexican Grill is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Altria Group and Chipotle Mexican Grill. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy automatically tells you what you need to know.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 16, 2010, at 10:14 AM, adam173 wrote:

    This seems like exactly the wrong thing. More mandates on companies, more strain on individuals and more government intrusion into our lives. People just need to be responsible for themselves and if not then sorry you are out of luck. Why not get rid of Social Security? There's an extra 12% of payroll that people could contribute to an IRA? Oh yea, Bush tried that but was ridiculed...I didn't like Bush anymore than the guy we currently have in the White House, but that idea actually made sense.

  • Report this Comment On August 17, 2010, at 2:54 PM, talotu wrote:

    How can you contend that investing in individual stocks is an appropriate investment for the uninformed investor? Especially someone that has <$5000, meaning each trade would be a minimum of 20 basis points of their entire savings.

    I can't imagine a better simple plan than defaulting to fixed income < $5000, and target date mutual funds when you exceed that amount. Given that most "sophisticated" investors would be better off with that strategy than by trying to pick individual stocks or mutual funds, it's ridiculous to suggest that we should be encouraging the same level of gambling in un-sophisticated savers.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1270659, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 2:23:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Caplinger
TMFGalagan

Dan Caplinger has been a contract writer for the Motley Fool since 2006. As the Fool's Director of Investment Planning, Dan oversees much of the personal-finance and investment-planning content published daily on Fool.com. With a background as an estate-planning attorney and independent financial consultant, Dan's articles are based on more than 20 years of experience from all angles of the financial world.

Today's Market

updated 17 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,805.41 127.51 0.76%
S&P 500 1,964.58 13.76 0.71%
NASD 4,483.72 30.92 0.69%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/24/2014 4:02 PM
AMTD $31.31 Up +0.05 +0.16%
TD Ameritrade CAPS Rating: *****
CMG $615.78 Up +5.78 +0.95%
Chipotle Mexican G… CAPS Rating: ***
ETFC $21.17 Up +0.22 +1.05%
E*TRADE Financial… CAPS Rating: ***
MNST $97.89 Up +0.26 +0.27%
Monster Beverage CAPS Rating: ****
MO $47.49 Up +0.36 +0.76%
Altria Group, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
SCHW $26.69 Up +0.16 +0.60%
Charles Schwab CAPS Rating: ***
T $33.87 Up +0.21 +0.62%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***