Sponsored by
Dividends & Income Investing
  •  

Searching for Visionary Stocks

By John Reeves (TMF Bane) February 26, 2007 Comments (0)

0 Recommendations

In Built to Last, authors James Collins and Jerry Porras define visionary companies as "premier institutions in their industries, widely admired by their peers and having a long track record of making a significant impact on the world around them." In other words, they are the best of the best.

The authors examined numerous companies over the years and found that many of them -- such as 3M (NYSE: MMM), Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), and Merck (NYSE: MRK) -- were not built by a high-profile charismatic leader. Collins and Porras ultimately conclude that "a charismatic visionary leader is absolutely not required for a visionary company, and in fact can be detrimental to a company's long-term prospects." Consider, for example, that for every Steve Jobs of Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) fame, there's a Patrick Byrne of Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK) shame -- someone who may have let ego get in the way of good business. Heck, even Steve Jobs has been known to let ego get in the way of good business.

The bottom line, however, is that visionary companies are never built by one man. Rather, they are premier institutions overall.

Visionary returns
We can combine those insights with the research of Jeremy Siegel, who showed that outstanding companies in mundane industries like food products and tobacco were the best performers over the past 50 years. The companies listed below were not part of a growth industry or a technological revolution, yet their returns were phenomenal.

Company

Annual Return (1950 to 2003)

Kraft

15.5%

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

14.4%

Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO)

14.3%

From The Future of Investors by Jeremy Siegel.

These companies would qualify as "visionary" using the definition above, and each was able to deliver great returns thanks to the power of reinvesting dividends. This same principle has allowed 3M, Procter & Gamble, and Merck -- each of which has delivered healthy dividend payout ratios over their respective histories -- to rack up outstanding returns over much of the past 50 years. Indeed, of the survivors of the original S&P 500, Merck comes in at No. 7 and P&G comes in at No. 16 in terms of annual return.

Who says I'm boring?
It's clear that you don't need to own shares in a sexy company with a charismatic leader in order to outperform the market. Selecting a premier institution that pays dividends -- even if it's led by a lower-profile leader -- can also deliver outstanding returns.

This last point is one that James Early, the advisor for Motley Fool Income Investor, discussed in the February issue of his investment service. James notes that boring, overlooked stocks can often deliver great returns and that "sexy stocks don't provide sexy returns."

Foolish bottom line
When searching for visionary companies to bolster your portfolio, remember:

  1. A visionary company doesn't need flashy products or a charismatic CEO.
  2. Many visionary companies in humdrum industries deliver outstanding returns via the power of reinvested dividends.
  3. And great companies in apparently boring industries are considerably less volatile on average.

These are the types of companies James and his team look for each month. So far they've been successful; the collection of Income Investor recommendations is beating the S&P 500 by nearly 9 percentage points over a three-year period.

To see James' latest selections, plus all of the service's past picks, click here for a full-access 30-day free trial. There's nothing dull about great returns.

John Reeves does not own shares of any company mentioned. His lack of the vision thing explains why he became an editor. 3M and Coca-Cola are Inside Value recommendations. Kraft is an Income Investor pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 535436, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 7/6/2008 10:29:15 PM, No ticker

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

No, thanks

Related Tickers

Apple, Inc.

AAPL Up! $170.12 +1.94 (+1.15%) 1:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
16933 Outperforms
1467 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,262.90+0.11%
DJIA11,288.54+0.65%
RSL 2K665.78 -0.98%
NASD2,245.38 -0.27%
Updated: 1:04:33 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Will the U.S. economy fall into recession?

Sponsored by: