Quick Take: CEO Compensation Bill Is a No-Brainer

Recs

16

Congressman Barney Frank has put together a very simple, shareholder-friendly way to add more accountability to executive compensation. The proposed bill, which passed the House Financial Services Committee a couple of weeks ago, would give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and a non-binding vote on any new golden parachutes.

This type of voting mechanism allows shareholders to collectively express their displeasure or lack thereof with management's compensation. The vote can't change compensation, unless a company's compensation committee and management think they're being given a hint to do so. Ultimately, that's all a non-binding vote can do; this, along with the SEC's focus on making compensation agreements easier to read, are two huge improvements for shareholders. Plus it's a far better solution than any arbitrary set of caps or rules on compensation -- an idea that has also been floated around.

Frank's idea isn't a new one, either. The U.K. already allows such votes, as do the Netherlands and Australia. To anyone who thinks the vote would hurt our markets, I note that the U.K. had more IPOs than the U.S. did last year.

Aflac (NYSE: AFL) has already agreed to do this with its shareholders by fiscal 2009. But shareholders at Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Income Investor selection Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) recently rejected the idea of an annual vote. The margin of victory at Morgan Stanley was far greater than at Bank of America. This isn't a huge surprise, because when things are going well, as they are at Morgan Stanley, there are generally fewer questions.

More votes are expected, but Frank's bill is a fairly simple and measured solution -- the kind I think most people generally welcome. Plus it's a lot better than the solutions our country has a history of coming up with once things have already gone wrong.

See what else Barney Frank is up to.

Nathan Parmelee has no ownership stake in any of the companies mentioned. Aflac is a Stock Advisor recommendation. The Motley Fool has an ironclad disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 525660, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 11:11:27 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Blog: Investment Classics for Short Attention Spans

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 10:54 AM
AFL $46.84 Up +0.44 +0.95%
Aflac, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
BAC $15.64 Down -0.25 -1.57%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
MS $31.03 Down -0.49 -1.55%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Common shareholder: A shareholder is a person or entity who owns shares of -- and therefore, an ownership stake in -- a company. There are two types, and common shareholders have different rights and privileges than preferred shareholders.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!