Getting Vaccinated Alongside Mom

Not resting on the fact that it had the first approved HPV vaccine, or the free publicity it got for giving it away, Merck (NYSE: MRK) presented data Sunday that its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil, is effective in women over the age of the group it was first approved for.

Gardasil is approved in the U.S. for females nine through 26 years of age, but the newest trial results showed that it's effective in protecting women up to the age of 45 against the virus. Merck plans to submit the label-expanding data to the FDA by the end of the year. That would allow it to market it to health practitioners for women up to age 45 toward the end of next year, assuming it gets a standard 10-month review.

The move is clearly a way for Merck to expand the market as competition heats up from GlaxoSmithKline's (NYSE: GSK) Cervarix in Europe, where Gardasil is marketed with Sanofi-Aventis (NYSE: SNY), as well as stateside where Cervarix will likely receive FDA approval early next year.

Merck may have a tough marketing job ahead of it. The big question is whether these women will choose to be vaccinated. The vaccine doesn't cover all the strains of HPV, so women still must have Pap screens regularly. Some may think that because they've lived this long without the vaccine it's unnecessary. I can already imagine the direct-to-consumer advertisements -- mom and daughter going to the doctor together for vaccinations.

The irony of the label expansion is that Merck will be spreading into a market it hopes will shrink. Women need only one series of three shots, and if it's successful at targeting girls and young women, then in 10 to 15 years the number of older women not immunized will be minimal.

Even so, there's no reason to waste the opportunity to vaccinate women now, and Merck seems well on its way.

More Foolishness to vaccinate your mind with:

Want to make money in up, down, and rollercoaster markets? Find out how. Claim your private invitation to a breakthrough new service from Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner and team. Simply enter your email below.

Comment (0)
Recommended (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 539769, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 10/15/2008 4:07:18 PM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Related Tickers

GlaxoSmithKline plc (ADR)

GSK Down! $36.69 -1.81 (-4.70%) 3:48 PM
CAPS Rating:
876 Outperforms
56 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 500920.48 -7.77%
DJIA8,692.44 -6.64%
NASD1,652.42 -7.12%
Updated: 3:51:26 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

What do you think will be the best performing sector over the next six months?

Sponsored by: