Second Chance for Merck's MEVACOR

Recs

1

Yesterday, Merck (NYSE: MRK) licensed the rights to an over-the-counter (OTC) version of its cholesterol-lowering drug MEVACOR to GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK), but the deal is far from done.

Merck has been trying to get MEVACOR changed to OTC status since before it lost its patent protection in 2001. The FDA has already rejected its requests for status change twice because of fears that people would misuse the drug, causing its first marketing partner, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), to discontinue the partnership.

Merck will get a third chance at getting the drug approved for OTC use when the FDA meets in the middle of next month. If it receives an approval, Merck will get milestone and royalty payments from Glaxo.

With most -- possibly all -- of the payments coming after FDA approval, investors shouldn't consider the partnership a sign that Merck is worried about a third rejection. Instead, Merck is probably trying to get a partner in place to launch as quickly as it can after the FDA makes a decision.

For Glaxo, the deal demonstrates its continued push toward generating revenue from products in front of the pharmacist's counter, rather than behind it. It recently launched Alli, an OTC version of Roche's Xenical weight-loss treatment, which contributed $69 million in top-line growth last quarter. With revenue falling because of warning labels on Avandia and generic competition from Wellbutrin XL, Coreg IR, and Zofran, the continued diversification seems like a shrewd move to me.

Without knowing the terms of the deal, it's a little hard to determine the real winner here. As long as the OTC sales don't pillage prescription drug sales of cholesterol-lowering drugs ZETIA and VYTORIN, which it markets with Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP), the new partnership should be a win for Merck.

Further cholesterol-fighting Foolishness:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 540833, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 11:59:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:02 PM
GSK $41.37 Up +0.85 +2.10%
GlaxoSmithKline pl… CAPS Rating: *****
JNJ $60.75 Up +0.45 +0.75%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
MRK $33.43 Up +0.84 +2.58%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
SGP $28.15 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Schering-Plough Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Variable cost: A variable cost is an expense that rises or falls in conjunction with a company's level of productivity.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!