Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Citi's 11% Isn't So Bad

I've repeatedly seen the media describe Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) as desperate because it had to pay 11% on the capital it recently raised. True, that percentage probably doesn't make chairman Robert Rubin feel like frolicking through the roses. But it's hardly the end of the world, either.

The deal
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, a sovereign fund, agreed to buy $7.5 billion worth of equity units. The units pay an 11% interest rate, and they're convertible into Citi's stock between 2010 and 2011, at prices ranging from $31.83 to $37.24 per share.

What the media thinks
The media is calling it a horrible deal for Citi. The reasoning goes that 11% is more than junk bonds are trading for. Thus, Citi's stock and credit rating now have junk status.

However, that's not entirely accurate. First of all, if Citi were to sell equity, it would have to pay a dividend of $2.16 per share, or about 7% of today's stock price. Thus, the extra premium for the capital from Abu Dhabi roughly represented a 4% interest rate.

In addition, you simply cannot compare the rates paid on debt and equity. It just doesn't make sense. It doesn't matter whether you're discussing banks that are under the gun, like Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC  ) or Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER  ) , or banks still sailing relatively smoothly, like Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) or Income Investor recommendation Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) . The cost of equity, whether implied or explicit, is always higher than the cost of debt.

This should be intuitive: Debt is higher in the capital structure. If Citigroup were to default, debtholders would get paid first. Stockholders? Back of the line. So why didn't Citi just sell some bonds and pay a lower rate? Simple: The company needs equity, not debt, to appease regulators. The $7.5 billion from Abu Dhabi will shore up the company's capital ratios.

Another way to think about it
Citi is selling roughly 5% of itself, and it's paying a 4% premium over its dividend rate. In return, it gets the use of $7.5 billion of cash forever. As an added bonus, if the stock recovers, it doesn't suffer additional dilution until shares rise past $37.24. That's a pretty decent premium to its recent $30-$32 trading range.

Here's an even simpler way to look at it. Let's say you, like the Abu Dhabi government, thought that Citi's stock might be worth a gamble. You could buy Citi's long-term calls, with a strike price of $30, for somewhere around $8.50 per contract. Thus, your buy-in rate would be $38.50 -- not too far from what Abu Dhabi would be paying.

Of course, Abu Dhabi also gets an 11% interest rate every year, and you get 0%. On the other hand, if the stock goes to 0, Abu Dhabi would probably lose its entire investment, while you'd only lose $8.50 per share.

Foolish thoughts
I'm not making any predictions about the future of the credit markets, or Citi's ability to navigate them without taking additional writedowns. My only point here is that Citi's cost of funds, while relatively steep, isn't as bad as the headlines would have you believe.

Citi needed a ton of cash, and it got $7.5 billion fairly quickly, at a price that compensates the investor for the opportunity cost of dividends, then adds an equity risk premium. I'd say it was a relatively fair deal for both parties.

Related Foolishness:

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 543125, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2016 3:49:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,179.03 -44.00 -0.24%
S&P 500 2,143.50 -7.83 -0.36%
NASD 5,281.19 -28.64 -0.54%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/25/2016 3:33 PM
C $49.65 Up +0.07 +0.13%
Citigroup CAPS Rating: ***
BAC $16.73 Down -0.05 -0.27%
Bank of America CAPS Rating: ****
BSC.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
ELEMENTS Benjamin… CAPS Rating: No stars
MER.DL2 $11.64 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Merrill Lynch & Co… CAPS Rating: *
WFC $45.71 Up +0.19 +0.41%
Wells Fargo CAPS Rating: ****