Glaxo's Global Growth Gambit

Recs

4

GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) has been stuck in rebuilding mode since last year, when its diabetes treatment Avandia took an unexpected sales hit over new safety issues. As the company prepares for the May 22 arrival of new CEO Andrew Witty, it's announcing even more upcoming changes and personnel shifts.

The company plans to rejigger its executive management team and increase its focus on selling pharmaceuticals in emerging markets. These vague proposals sound nice, but hasn't Glaxo been pursuing greater global growth already? Without specifics, determining these plans' feasibility seems difficult.

No drugmaker can increase its presence in new markets without hiring new local sales staff and other employees, but any spending spree Glaxo launches in emerging markets will be a little ironic. Only six months ago, outgoing CEO JP Garnier warned of a potential 1.5 billion British pounds in restructuring charges. Garnier also advocated more job cuts and other cost-cutting measures to "streamline" Glaxo's operations and improve its productivity and research and development efficiencies.

In contrast, Witty has emphasized building GSK's business through new partnerships, and he may form a new team to investigate possible deals. Sounds like a move right out of Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE: JNJ) playbook, although Glaxo's already no stranger to moderate acquisitions. Just a week ago, the company announced plans to acquire Sirtris Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: SIRT) for around $720 million in cash.

We'll have to see what this emphasis on growth through dealmaking and new markets means for Glaxo's future. However, if Glaxo's truly interested in expansion, multiple development-stage pharma executives are doubtlessly cheering now -- and envisioning premium prices for their compounds and companies.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 635286, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 6:09:42 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:01 PM
GSK $40.52 Up +0.06 +0.15%
GlaxoSmithKline pl… CAPS Rating: *****
JNJ $60.30 Up +0.32 +0.53%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Buying in thirds: Buying in thirds is a time-honored Motley Fool practice, teaching investors to enter an eventual "full" stockholding in three separate lots. This is typically advisable for those who are new to investing, those who like a stock long-term but worry about its present valuation being high, and those who like to dollar-cost average.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!