The Market Indicator You Shouldn't Ignore

Recs

31

It's looking gloomy out there. The S&P 500 is down 12% year to date, led by the financial sector, which has lost one-fourth of its valuation. Even the "best" sectors of 2008 -- consumer staples and health care -- are down year to date.

But there are two reasons why this is a great time to be invested in the market.

Add it up
Amid all the doom and gloom, one silver lining has drawn little attention: Dividend yields are the highest they've been more than a dozen years.

The recent market plunge has increased the S&P 500's dividend yield to 2.2%, its highest level since December 1995. Not even during the aftermath of the tech bubble collapse in the fall of 2002 -- when the S&P 500 traded at a paltry 815 -- did the yield break 2.0%.

The increased yield is even more impressive when you consider the following:

  • 10% fewer companies paid dividends in 2007 than in 1995.
  • Share buybacks have more than quadrupled since 2003.
  • The $589 billion companies spent in 2007 to buy back shares is more than double the $246 billion paid out in cash dividends the same year. For example, IBM (NYSE: IBM) repurchased $19 billion worth of stock in 2007, vs. only $8 billion in 2006. That $19 billion buyback dwarfed the $2 billion paid out in cash dividends.
  • Financials, which have historically been the biggest dividend payers, comprising 16% of the index but paying 25% of the dividends, have been cutting their payouts. Wachovia (NYSE: WB) is a case in point, slashing its quarterly dividend per share from $0.375 to $0.05.

Some of our most well-known blue-chip stocks, like recent Warren Buffett investment Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW), currently sport yields in the 4% range or higher -- more than double an already-high S&P 500 average. Even stalwart General Electric (NYSE: GE) trades at an unheard-of 4.2% yield.

An unexpected disparity
But high dividend yields aren't the only reason this is a great time to be in the market -- stocks are also cheaper than trusty bonds.

The 10-year Treasury bond currently yields 4%. The equivalent measure of return for stocks is the earnings yield (earnings divided by price) -- and it currently stands at 5.5% for the S&P 500.

This divergence is unusual -- and a potential boon for investors. According to renowned value investor Arnold Van Den Berg of Century Management, (whose firm returned 13% net of fees vs. 6% for the S&P 500 over the past 10 years):

The usual difference between a bond yield and stock earnings yield is about 1%. For example, if investors can get 6.3% on a guaranteed bond they are willing to accept 1% less, or a 5.3% earnings yield on a stock. The reason for this is that if you have a 5.3% stock earnings yield and it is growing at 7%, it will equal your 6.3% bond yield in about 3 years. Anytime thereafter, the stock earnings yield will increase by 7% per year.

Investors are usually willing to accept a lower yield in stocks, because of the presumption of future growth. Right now, however, investors can get that growth at a better price than bonds -- and with the added bonus of high dividend yields.

Earnings yields like this suggest the market thinks earnings are likely to fall. But I would counter that even if earnings fell, the S&P 500 still would yield almost equal to the Treasury bond rate.

A good time to buy
The combination of high dividend and earnings yields relative to bond yields means that this is a great time to buy dividend stocks.

And there are a lot of good options to research further. Energy behemoth BP (NYSE: BP) shares cost roughly what they did in 2005, and the yield is currently 5.6%. Money manager AllianceBernstein (NYSE: AB) has seen money flow out of its core value funds, yet it still boasts more than $690 billion in assets under management, along with some of the best brands and talent in the business -- and its shares are currently yielding more than 7%. Kimberly Clark (NYSE: KMB), which has increased its annual dividend for 36 straight years, currently yields 3.8%. As my colleague Tim Hanson notes, dividend payers like these could save you from massive losses.

At Motley Fool Income Investor, we believe in the power of dividends to create unbeatable long-term returns. Our recommendations have an average dividend yield of 5.6% -- and an overall return of 17% compared to 10% for like amounts invested in the S&P 500.

Interested in adding a few dividend powerhouses to your portfolio? You can see all of our recommendations, as well as our best bets for new money now, with a 30-day free trial. Click here to get started.

Fool analyst Andrew Sullivan loves dividends, but does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. Dow Chemical, Alliance Bernstein, and Kimberly Clark are all Income Investor recommendations. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy pays ... well, you know.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 12, 2008, at 2:16 PM, scaredshort wrote:

    I would tread with caution here, although dividends are creeping up, one needs to look back prior to the 90s and see rarely ever did dividends dip below 3% and at prior recession lows of the DJIA dividends were in the 6-7% range. I also urge investors to realize that share buy backs, including the mentioned IBM were financed by issuing bonds. Companies that took this action will find replacing those bonds as they expire to be a lot more expensive. Also note that stock buybacks today are a mere pittance of a few years back. If stocks are so cheap in particular the financials, whom "have plenty of cash and do not need to raise funds", why are they not buying back stock in droves?

  • Report this Comment On August 12, 2008, at 2:55 PM, North8 wrote:

    Regarding Dow Chemical: Dow's facility under construction outside of Bombay was torched a few weeks ago by members of a Hindu religious sect, who feel that Dow's legacy in Bhopal and around the world is unacceptable and that Dow will destroy the area that is sacred to them. Villagers next to the plant have been protesting peacefully since January - grinding construction to a halt since then. The sect which destroyed the facility, has pledged to do so again should Dow resume construction. Dow's refusal to present Union Carbide in Indian criminal court, or clean up the Bhopal facility that Carbide allowed to contaminate the drinking water in Bhopal has angered millions of Indian citizens. Pictures of the destruction can be seen here: http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/article.php?id=1121

  • Report this Comment On August 12, 2008, at 5:21 PM, andfaraway wrote:

    Don't higher returns indicate higher risk, - surely that's why they are higher.

    If shares are that cheap, a better indicator would be 'director purchases' , after all they are the ones who would know a good thing, especially when it was right under their noses.

    In inflationary times, excess cash is the last thing you want to hold, a six percent dividend is far less when adjusted for any inflation, - currently running close to double figures.

    Those shares that appear 'cheap' are in reality nothing more than shares with an increased exposure to risk...

  • Report this Comment On August 15, 2008, at 11:21 AM, cgscouten wrote:

    Dividend yield is usually on trailing twelve month (TTM) basis. In today's declining stock market, this means yield calculated using last year's (probably) inflated dividend and today's depressed stock price. And that dividend is likely to get cut.

    What interests me is the projected dividend divided by the projected stock price. Wishful thinking. OK then, how about projected dividend divided by today's stock price. Not taking into account the likelihood of having the dividend slashed is a great way to a BAD investment.

  • Report this Comment On August 15, 2008, at 6:10 PM, vest0r2 wrote:

    Does anyone believe that Wachovia is going to be afloat in six months?

  • Report this Comment On August 16, 2008, at 10:20 PM, xercon wrote:

    Dividend investing is fine if the company is solvent enough to continue to pay last year's dividens. However, it makes more sense to me that i you believe the company will prosper in the future, reinvest the dividends in the company if you have faith in it.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2008, at 10:20 AM, biotechmgr wrote:

    Advising that this is a great time to buy is the height of irresponsibility. I could go on with an onerous recapitulation of what is going wrong in the financial system. Attempts such as these to lure investors back in the market are not what the average investor needs in troubled financial times. Rather, prudence and caution are called for when there are so many signposts of trouble.

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2008, at 3:41 PM, journeywithme wrote:

    I have just started my investment journey and I have read that it is both a good idea to invest in companies that have a long and solid history of paying dividends and that it is best to reinvest these dividends back into the company. I am learning so much about investing; mostly on my own, and I look forward to building a strong performing portfolio; even in these tough economic times.

    http://ourstockmarketjourney.blogspot.com/ . Be well.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 705335, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 9:19:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
BP $58.43 Down -0.10 -0.17%
BP plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
GE $15.33 Up +0.90 +6.24%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
DOW $24.80 Down -0.10 -0.40%
The Dow Chemical C… CAPS Rating: ****
IBM $123.49 Up +0.94 +0.77%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ***
KMB $63.71 Up +0.16 +0.25%
Kimberly-Clark Cor… CAPS Rating: ****
AB $26.35 Up +0.05 +0.19%
AllianceBernstein… CAPS Rating: ****
WB $5.54 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Wachovia Corp CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Net income: Net income is a company's earnings or profit as reported on the income statement. Revenue minus all expenses gives you net income. The famous "bottom line."

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!