JPMorgan: 1, Taxpayers: -$2.7 Billion

Remember the good ol' days, when the size of government bailouts was measured in mere tens of billions of dollars? You know -- back in March? That's when the U.S. Treasury facilitated JPMorgan Chase's (NYSE: JPM  ) takeover of Bear Stearns by guaranteeing $29 billion in troubled mortgage-related assets on Bear's books.

The score
The good news is that the rescue was successful -- the financial system suffered no mortal wound. For JPMorgan Chase shareholders, the news was even better; the bank walked off with Bear for a song. The bad news, for U.S. taxpayers at least, is that the value of Bear's portfolio has fallen since then. The Federal Reserve recently announced that it (or you the taxpayer, effectively) has a $2.7 billion paper loss on its commitment.

While I do think the government will ultimately record an aggregate gain on its investments in institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) , this is a reminder that the government's $700 billion bailout program is far from riskless.

There are two morals here: First, when you guarantee the value of a portfolio of dodgy assets, you should ask for something in return. Not demanding warrants from JPMorgan Chase was a mistake.

You really want to expand the bailout?
Second, this episode and AIG's (NYSE: AIG  ) blistering drawdown of its initial $85 billion government loan should serve as obvious warnings to the government, as it reportedly mulls over whether or not to expand the scope of the bailout program to non-banks such as GE Capital, a unit of General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) , or CIT Group (NYSE: CIT  ) . Free-market champion Friedrich Hayek must be spinning in his grave.

Further credit crisis Foolishness:

What now? The Motley Fool is here to answer your questions about this financial crisis. Send us an email at AsktheFool@fool.com, and check back at Fool.com as we answer your questions and cover the latest on the Panic of 2008.

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA has a beneficial interest in Wells Fargo, but not in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are Motley Fool Income Investor selections. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy wishes to clarify that Friedrich, regrettably, is no relation to Salma.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (11)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 12:46 PM, damasterwc wrote:

    i can't believe you guys tolerate this completely corporatist takeover... go read history... this is mussolini all over again.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 771216, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2014 10:55:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement