Obama's First Task: Rebuilding Our Housing

Recs

12

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

How will President-elect Obama affect your portfolio? Keep reading our special series for the lowdown.

Even though I have long watched the housing sector, I've been shocked by the ferocity of its current crisis, along with the broader economic turmoil it's created. Its effects are now spreading across the globe in the form of credit seizures that threaten the economies of the developed and the developing worlds alike. If left untreated, they'll clearly result in further big losses for those who have placed their savings, retirement, or other funds in U.S. and overseas equities markets.

We now know that the next president of the United States is Barack Obama, who will be inaugurated in the third week of January. Clearly there's not a single more crucial issue for the new president to tackle immediately than our complicated housing apocalypse. The economies of the world will depend upon the early steps he takes, as likely will the ultimate success of his presidency. But from what we know of the president-elect, what medicines is he likely to first apply to housing's sickness?

Finding clues to the direction
As I know you are, I'm still trying to study the president-elect's prior statements in order to better understand the housing-related measures he will first propose. Happily, as a confirmed free-marketer, I'm able to endorse most of the likely steps as being beneficial to dragging housing and mortgage finance out of the ditch into which they've fallen. I'm betting that those first steps will be efforts to:

1. Stem the raging tide of home foreclosures. A movement in this direction would constitute a tourniquet for a foreclosure rate that hit 766,000 households in the September quarter. The likely first step in this effort would be a formalized program with the federal government working -- perhaps informally -- with the likes of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), institutions that have already committed to developing new loan terms for the most distressed homeowners.

2. Permit bankruptcy judges to alter mortgage terms. In a white paper put out by BarackObama.com, the soon to be new president noted that, while investors who own multiple homes can renegotiate their mortgages during bankruptcy, "current Chapter 13 law requires ordinary families to stick with the original terms of their home loans -- regardless of whether the loan was predatory or unfair." Watch for a quick change in this circumstance.

3. Fight mortgage fraud and inappropriate subprime loans. There almost certainly will be a new series of steps that will define mortgage fraud more accurately than heretofore has been the case, and that will provide funding to federal and state anti-fraud enforcement programs.

4. Provide a new mortgage interest tax credit. Obama has proposed a mortgage interest tax credit. According to his white paper, his proposal would "ensure that middle-class Americans get the financial assistance they need to purchase or keep their own home by creating a 10 percent universal mortgage credit …" I am, frankly, less certain of the wisdom here. Wasn't it this sort of approach -- the push to provide mortgages to the severely disadvantaged -- that helped land us in the soup in which we're currently swimming?

5. Closely control Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE). These hybrid government/private sector entities clearly haven't worked. Perhaps I'm stretching here, but a few years ago, then-Senator Obama wrote a letter to the Treasury Secretary, going on record that subprime loans were dangers and should be dealt with. I'm extrapolating that message to a presumption that, as president, Obama would stand foursquare against both subprime and Alt-A mortgage lending abuses.

6. Ensure more accurate loan disclosure. I must admit that, despite having a graduate degree in economics, I've signed loan disclosure documents in the past that I didn't fully understand. I would therefore welcome a requirement that loan information be easy to understand. Obama's white paper includes a provision for new mortgage clarity.

7. Develop a "sorely needed" economic homeownership stimulus. If you think about it, the measures above deal with the needs of home buyers and borrowers. But as Bob Toll and Ara Hovnanian, the CEOs of Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL) and Hovnanian (NYSE: HOV), respectively, noted on CNBC on Wednesday, one can make a case for attention to the demand side of housing, as the National Association of Home Builders has. Without buyers, the rate of new home sales is unlikely to ascend from its current level of just above 450,000 units a year -- down from 1.2 million units three years ago. The form that this stimulus might take is clearly open to debate, but it seems that the need is unassailable.

Finally, while I haven't seen it listed among Obama's desires -- nor has it been part of most discussions about housing -- I'd welcome stronger standards being applied to the performances of the credit rating agencies, a la McGraw-Hill's (NYSE: MHP) Standard & Poor's unit. If any group has been derelict in the creation of our mortgage-induced credit meltdown, it was the raters. Real and professional credit rating efforts could have gone a long way to prevent the quagmire into which our economy has descended.

For related Foolishness:

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are Motley Fool Income Investor picks. The McGraw-Hill Companies is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor David Lee Smith does have a mortgage that he services faithfully, but he doesn't have shares in any of the companies mentioned. He does welcome your questions or comments. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2008, at 4:09 AM, fool474 wrote:

    Re: 4. Provide a new mortgage interest tax credit.

    If ownership of a self inhabited house is stimulated by a minor tax benefit, this will not lead to a mortgage crisis.

    What does lead to a mortgage crisis is uncontrolled growth of mortgage and home-equity loans, careless lending policies, and possibly more important the lack of responsible borrowers as the opportunity that a borrower can walk away from house finance debt seems to be always open.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2008, at 8:57 PM, GinDland wrote:

    All of these proposals are at odds with your claim to believe in "free markets". They also all miss the point of what the problem really is. Once one realizes that the problem is that houses are not worth as much as people thought they were ( that is, housing remains over-priced) it becomes clear that policies that prevent that price discovery are likely to be counter-productive.

    I would suggest doing none of these things. In fact, I would remove some of the perverse incentives that led to over-investment in real estate in the first place (mortgage interest tax deduction, cap gains exclusion).

    Yes, house prices will fall, but they will fall anyway. In the end, declines in house prices, though painful to current owners and current GDP, is a boon to future home purchasers for generations to come.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2008, at 2:32 AM, justmytake wrote:

    THE HOUSING CRISIS / RECESSION – SOLVED!

    Problem #1 – The banks are not equipped to effectively market and sell the tidal wave of foreclosed homes that are coming back to them. Their solution thus far, has been to continually and rapidly discount the surging inventory of homes that they are acquiring. This has served to severely undermine the average Americans concept of and expectations for homeownership. New home builders have been prolonging the agony by continuing to build new homes – albeit at a rate of approximately one third of the peak production.

    Problem #2 – Consumers have dramatically curtailed their spending because: 1) they have lost their job or 2) they are afraid they will lose their job or 3) they are afraid they will incur a pay cut. Of course, the more everyone retreats from spending, the more these become self fulfilling prophecies.

    Problem #3 – The federal government’s effort thus far to restore consumer confidence and stabilize the economy has not been perceived as effective – much too nebulous to inspire hope.

    SOLUTION to Problem #1 – In the hardest hit areas of the country, there is a huge chasm between the list price for a bank owned home and a comparably sized and equipped new home. In many cases, banks are pricing foreclosed properties at below replacement cost. If a new home builder tries to compete with the banks, it usually means more losses for both. To solve this problem, the federal government needs to offer low cost loans on a limited basis to new home builders who are willing to establish a used home resale division and purchase the bank’s distressed properties for refurbishment. The builders have the resources in place to quickly return these neglected properties to their former grandeur. Since most of the foreclosed properties are in or near areas where builders still have models and new homes for sale, the marketing of these restored homes could be handled by the builder’s existing staff. Because these refurbished homes could be sold for a profit at a price that would be lower than a comparable new home, but higher than a stripped out and neglected bank owned home, this would quickly put a bottom in for the housing market. Builders could continue profitable operations without building more new homes. Houses that have become eyesores would disappear.

    SOLUTION to Problems #2 and #3 - The federal government needs to offer the American home owning public a one time opportunity to withdraw funds from their 401K’s/IRA’s/SEP IRA’s, etc. equivalent to X number of house payments (say six, for example), for the express purpose of applying these funds to their mortgage balance by moving the money to an escrow account at the applicable mortgage companies. These funds should be transferred without penalties and ideally without taxes. To stimulate new sales, this offer should be extended to those folks who purchase a home during a set period of time. Although this move would cost the government some future revenues, it would stimulate a lot of pent up consumer demand ( a consumer who skips six months of house payments will have plenty of discretionary money) and wouldn’t cost any TARP funds. The banks would love the security of knowing they already have a customer’s next six months payments on hand. Although most people would love to take money out of the stock market right now, paradoxically, this would be a signal to the savvy investor that a stock market bottom was near.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2008, at 2:55 AM, zloj wrote:

    How about the simplest solution? Stop supporting prices and let these piles of bricks cost what they should - 50K to 100K new, 25K to 50K used. No mortgages needed, no subprime loan issues. Wouldn't that solve the problem?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 771697, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 7:22:43 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Why Investors Should Be Excited for a Bank Breakup

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $16.29 Up +0.20 +1.24%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
FRE $1.16 Up +0.02 +1.75%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: *
HOV $4.06 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Hovnanian Enterpri… CAPS Rating: *
JPM $43.28 Up +0.82 +1.93%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
MHP $30.94 Up +0.18 +0.57%
The McGraw-Hill Co… CAPS Rating: ***
TOL $19.86 Down -0.16 -0.80%
Toll Brothers, Inc… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Asset: An asset is any property owned by a company or person that has economic value, especially those that can be converted to cash.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!