GMAC Steers Taxpayers Wrong

Recs

2

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

Forgive those of us who have been skeptical about the bailouts of Citigroup (NYSE: C), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) if we continue to remain unconvinced about the lifeline tossed to GMAC.

The financing arm of General Motors (NYSE: GM) got a $5 billion cash infusion from Wall Street's sugar daddy, Hank Paulson, while GM itself got an extra billion to inject into it, too. Treasury approved GMAC's conversion to a bank holding company even though it had failed to persuade the requisite number of bondholders to participate in a debt swap.

Perhaps those bondholders had a good idea that Paulson would cave in anyway. If GMAC went under, what would that mean for GM's survival? Treasury had just agreed to pump $17.4 billion into GM and Chrysler. If cheap financing for cars wasn't available to entice buyers, the carmaker might go under anyway. The death spiral that everyone feared would drag down even Ford (NYSE: F) might just manifest itself.   

No more bazookas
But consider the bucket of bolts Paulson just spilled on the ground. As part of the auto bailout, GM has to reduce its debt by two-thirds through debt swaps. Yet now that Paulson has set precedent of requiring bondholders to do nothing, what are the chances that GM's bondholders will give up their hands?

And why should the unions agree to any demands now either? Although they're supposed to agree to wage cuts equal to levels of foreign carmakers, there's probably little incentive to give in since Uncle Sugar has shown a propensity to keep handing out the sweets. Paulson has effectively swept the threat of bankruptcy from the table.

Dogging an exit strategy
The financing deal with GMAC requires its majority private equity owner, Cerberus Capital Management, to reduce its ownership stake to 33% by distributing portions of its equity directly to it co-investors. GM, which owns the other 49% of the financing outfit, will have to reduce its holdings to 10% within three years, and that has some thinking that there may be an IPO for GMAC in the works. 

A public offering might be just the thing to allow Cerberus to get out of its investment, something it has been unable to do since the financial markets collapsed. The government, which gets 5 million preferred GMAC shares paying 8% interest, would likely benefit, too.

The initial cash infusion is also giving GM an unfair marketing advantage. With GMAC offering low- and no-cost financing -- while also lowering the FICO credit score that borrowers need to qualify -- GM is able to offer deals unavailable to Ford. Although Toyota (NYSE: TM) and Nissan (Nasdaq: NSANY) are also offering zero-percent deals, they're not getting direct government infusions. Treasury is essentially putting its ownership stake ahead of the rest of the industry.

Cerberus, meanwhile, is angling to extricate itself from a bad bet on a damaged auto industry at taxpayer expense. Paulson has stepped in to save them twice now, but in doing so has jeopardized any chance of real reform of the auto industry. It's not that he's saying some rules are made to be broken, but rather that they just don't apply to him. Pardon us if we critics continue to think these bailouts have more to do with helping Wall Street than fixing what's wrong for the benefit of Main Street.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. Nissan Motor Co. is a Motley Fool Global Gains selection. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are Motley Fool Income Investor recommendations. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 05, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Milligram46 wrote:

    I can't believe this story, especially when I read this...

    <i>The initial cash infusion is also giving GM an unfair marketing advantage. With GMAC offering low- and no-cost financing -- while also lowering the FICO credit score that borrowers need to qualify -- GM is able to offer deals unavailable to Ford. Although Toyota (NYSE: TM) and Nissan (Nasdaq: NSANY) are also offering zero-percent deals, they're not getting direct government infusions. Treasury is essentially putting its ownership stake ahead of the rest of the industry.</i>

    You know, my understanding was TARP was suppose to be used, immediately, to unfreeze credit markets and get business and consumers spending again. So you're complaining that GMAC is using the TARP money for what it was for. So when will you be writing about how unfair TARP is for HSBC or UBS because the fed gave the big banks all that money and put the foreign banks at a disadvantage.

    I'm so sorry that GM was the best of the worst in December, and out did the analysts by over 10% because of literally, less than one week of sales because suddenly, they could write car loans again.

    If Toyota has all the answers, then why did their sales slide 37%, worse than both Ford and GM, and why are they struggling with inventory levels tickling 100 days deep, on par with the Detroit big three, and sending dire news that there sink/swim number is seven million cars a year, a number they are rapidly accelerating too.

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2009, at 6:10 AM, RaulChapin wrote:

    Milligram46, you might start by actually reading the first line of the story. "Forgive those of us who have been skeptical about the bailouts of Citigroup (NYSE: C), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) if we continue to remain unconvinced about the lifeline tossed to GMAC."

    What that basically says is that the author does not fully (or perhaps even partially) agree to the bailout extravaganza. So why would you expect him to agree to the expansion of it.

    The supposed "success" of GM after GMAC was bailed out is no success at all. Here is how it worked in uncomplicated terms:

    The government takes 5 billion dollars. Then goes to the average american and says the following: I will give you free credit (with 0% financing or 0.9% financing which is way under what the market would dictate) I will give it to you even if your credit score would not allow you to get said credit with anyone else (other than high risk high interest lenders) and i will give it to you

    as long as you buy a GM.

    Now tell me that it is any wonder people actually went and bought more GM cars. Don't blame Toyota for being in trouble, they made the STUPID assumption that the USA was actually somewhat of a free market, they made the STUPID assumption that selling high quality at affordable prices would be a good strategy... they forgot that much like China, the USA can choose to change the rules for you when and how ever it pleases.

    And by the way, it is not just Toyota and Ford that get hurt by this deal. Used autosales would definately get hurt, resale value for existing car owners gets hurt. Nevermind going into the enviromental impact of subsidizing the buying of NEW when less than new could have done.

    The question that arises from this is: Why invest in the USA with its low rate of growth, when for the same level of political/economical risk, you can invest in Mexico, Brazil, India which have much higher growth opportunities (and which political figures might be cheaper to brive than their USA counterparts). The opportunity cost of the bailout is what is not seen, what will never be measured is the ammount NOT invested, the dollars NOT demanded, the qualified labour NOT immigrating to USA to increase its competitivness, the vacations NOT taken by the people who saved all their lives to have a comfortable retirement and will now have to make do with less.

    So I guess Toyota is to be blamed and ridiculed for failing, with an arm tide behind its back and blindfolded, to beat GM.... Bravo GM you are the best!!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 804023, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 2:45:36 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

7/31/2009 4:00 PM
NSANY $14.49 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Nissan Motor Co.,… CAPS Rating: **
BAC $15.05 Down -0.08 -0.53%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
TM $78.16 Down -2.42 -3.00%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ***
F $7.75 Up +0.30 +4.03%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *
JPM $43.48 Down -0.39 -0.89%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: **
C $4.06 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Speculation: Speculation is a risky bet that could have a large payoff if it works out. The speculative investor attempts to profit from the price fluctuations of real estate, commodities, stocks, or any other type of investment that stands to churn out a profit.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!