B of A's Ken Lewis: Still Mostly Clueless

Recs

24

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Yesterday on CNBC, Maria Bartiromo asked Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) CEO Ken Lewis how he would prove to an upcoming shareholder meeting that Merrill Lynch will become something that, you know, doesn't require a 12-figure bailout by the federal government. With shares down 80% in the past year, that seems like a reasonable question. Here's how Lewis responded:

"We think we have a great story to tell. Yes, it's going to be a tough year on credit, but these two strategic acquisitions we've made [Merrill Lynch and Countrywide], we're already seeing the benefit of them."

Already seeing the benefit? Oh Ken, Ken, Ken. You're being extremely discourteous to the word "benefit." Shareholders (and taxpayers) have a great story to tell, too. It's a story about a banker who bought something he didn't really understand. When reality caught up, taxpayers were forced to backstop his mistakes to the tune of more than $100 billion, nearly annihilating shareholders in the process. This banker, amazingly, is still gainfully employed, and he insists Merrill was a great deal because it has operating profits before writedowns. Now that's a heckuva story.

I'm not trying to belabor the obvious failure that was Merrill Lynch. But it's important to note Lewis's continued insistence that buying Merrill wasn't a bad idea. Shares were down more than 90% at one point, yet every time someone inquires about the Merrill acquisition, Lewis dives into something along the lines of, "I don't know what you're talking about. That was a great deal. We're doing just fine. Merrill is the king of all kings."

This kind of reminds me of Baghdad Bob, the former Iraqi Information Minster who, in the early days of the second Gulf War, insisted American troops were nowhere to be seen -- all while American tanks patrolled outside his building.  

If Lewis simply came out and said, "Look, we really screwed up here. Mea culpa. We made a major miscalculation, and we'll do everything in our power to fix it as soon as possible. In the meantime, we'll keep you informed every step of the way," he'd still hold a fair amount of respect and credibility. Instead, investors have been left largely devoid of information. When they do get the opportunity to hear Lewis speak, it's a slap in the face. Meanwhile, competitors like JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) are running circles around B of A.

Rather than clinging to the Peter Pan philosophy of imagining things into existence, Lewis might behoove himself -- and shareholders -- to simply acknowledge mistakes that are already well known. Perception trumps reality these days, and when a CEO denies a reality that's already clear as day, investors can't help but wonder what's really lurking behind the scenes.

For related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 3:12 PM, dlpfrench wrote:

    Yes and its up 230% since I bought it...and it is up 7% today after being trashed by you and all other media in the country. What do we know that you rocket scientists have not yet figured out.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 3:25 PM, winterstone wrote:

    It appears you have a major personal issue either with Ken Lewis or BofA. There has been a great deal of trashing BofA and Ken Lewis but the company did beat all expectations yesterday by posting a 4.2 Billion profit the first quarter (much more than any other large bank). Also, what do you mean by $100 billion dollar bailout to BofA? not sure where the math went wrong, but last we all ever heard was it was $45 B and BofA expects to pay it back by the end of the year.... IF the Tresury allows it.... (which is my major issue, that the Tresury may not allow the banks to pay back early).......

    So get out of the trash mode and look at the bright sides of things! If it was not for negative people like this person, things would not be as bad as they appear to be...

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, weiwentg wrote:

    I believe the FDIC is also backstopping some of BoA's loans, so the total sum of assistance is more than just under the TARP.

    The positive earnings that BoA reported were mainly driven by one time gains like the sale of their stake in China Construction Bank. Underlying that is deteriorating credit quality. Merill was indeed a positive surprise and made their numbers less bad than they would otherwise have been, but this is still a deeply wounded bank.

    Housel is right - Ken Lewis dropped the ball big time.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, TMFHousel wrote:

    winterstone,

    1) Yesterday's $4.2 billion profit was before preferred stock dividends to the government and included $4.1 billion in one-time gains from selling assets and mark-to-market adjustments from its spreads blowing out.

    2) The $100 billion figure comes from a government-backed loss guarantee on $118 billion worth of assets. More:

    http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/16/news/companies/bofa_new_bail...

    Thanks for your comments.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 5:21 PM, SECRegulator wrote:

    You really are a fool if you believe the bankers caused the collapse of the markets all by themself. Bankers are born to make money. It is what they do. If they don't make money, they will be immediately fired. The system broke down because 2 groups of people did not do their job: 1. Rating Agencies; and 2. Government Regulators like the SEC, the FED and to a greater extent Congress. The Rating Agencies maintined their AAA Rating on AIG when there were no reserves and AIG was unhedged. Basically, Moody's and S&P blew it. If a banker goes to his credit committee for approval of a new risk, the committee first asks "what is the Moody's and S&P Rating?" No one is saying the banks should have had additional safeguards to prevent the indivisual bankers from leveraging the balance sheet, but the rating agencies were telling the banks that the risk they were taking was non-existent by publishing and confirming the now obvious wrong credit ratings. It is like letting a kid loose in the candy store without his mother, then wondering why the kid has rotten teeth.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 5:38 PM, rd80 wrote:

    Morgan,

    Here's a future article recommendation for you. Cover the accounting rule that let C, BAC and others mark down their liabilities in a little depth. Maybe walk through a simple example with a translation from accountantese to plain English.

    I understand they're marking liabilities down to market, effectively creating a gain on their own debt. What I'm missing is what exactly gets marked - the debt, CDS, both??

    Russ

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, TMFHousel wrote:
Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 879844, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 4:35:18 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $16.09 Up +0.01 +0.06%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
GS $170.01 Down -2.82 -1.63%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
JPM $42.46 Down -0.09 -0.21%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Poop and scoop: Poop and scoop is a form of illegal stock manipulation, where a scammer tries to drive down the price of stock through publishing and distributing unsolicited misleading advertising materials so that the scammer can buy the stock at a lower price.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!