This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

6

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Emboldened (perhaps) by its (so far) successful recommendation of DirecTV (NYSE: DTV) earlier this week, Wall Street equity shop Pali Research boldly forged back into the tele-sphere yesterday with a pair of new initiations. Survey says ... sell AT&T (NYSE: T), buy Verizon (NYSE: VZ).

Buy why?
Making the best use of Microsoft Word's underpraised cut-and-paste feature, Pali wielded one and the same argument to both slay AT&T and save Verizon: "As the wireless industry passes 90% penetration, growth in revenue and profitability becomes a market share game demanding that investors pick winners and losers ..."

Pali predicts Verizon will be a "winner" based on its "best in class network and strong customer care. Verizon ranked No. 1 in our Q2 survey of customer care response times." Pali further predicted that "disgruntled AT&T customers" will flee to Verizon over the next several years as their two-year iPhone family plan contracts expire. Pali sees AT&T's net new subscribers dropping to "less than 1 million in 2010 from more than 4 million in 2008 and to turn negative in 2011."

Which is a pretty bold prediction, you must admit. Pali's saying that AT&T, which has gained customers in a recession -- albeit with some help from Apple -- is going to lose customers over time, even as the economy regains strength. Hard to believe.

Let's go to the tape
And it gets harder. Earlier this week, I praised Pali for its strong record of picking winners such as Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) in media stocks. Fairness dictates that I point out, too, that Pali's telecom picks have failed to impress lately:

Stock

Pali Says:

CAPS Says:

Pali's Picks Beating (Lagging) S&P By:

America Movil (NYSE: AMX)

Underperform

*****

(<1 point)

Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S)

Outperform

**

(3 point)

China Mobile (NYSE: CHL)

Outperform

*****

(6 points)

That said, fairness also requires that I mention how good a job Pali has done on telecom historically. None of Pali's active recommendations in telecom are currently outperforming the market, but over the two years and more that we've watched this company operate, Pali has racked up an even record of 50% accuracy in telecom. It's really nailed some picks, while its misses aren't down substantially for the most part. Sprint, in particular, where Pali's now just treading water, generated 47 percentage points' worth of market outperformance for Pali when the analyst panned it in 2007.

Verizon vs. AT&T
Now personally, I'm more of a value and a growth investor. When I look at Verizon and AT&T, selling for 13 and 11 times earnings, respectively, and both being pegged for less than 4% long-term profit growth -- I'm unimpressed.

Granted, both stocks pay out strong, 6%-plus dividends, so I can see why an income investor would find them attractive. But neither firm is doing a whole lot of growing. And in fact, considering that Verizon is slightly more expensive than AT&T and pays a slightly lower dividend, my hunch is that an income-seeking individual might actually be better off buying the stock Pali says to sell, and selling the one it advises buying.

Foolish takeaway
That said, even if you think like I do, I'd urge you to reserve judgment on these two stocks. Based on Pali's record, it's clear that this analyst knows a thing or two about long-term investing. If dividends are your thing, then your best bet is to buy the stock that Pali prefers: Verizon.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. Sprint Nextel is an Inside Value selection. America Movil is a Global Gains selection.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own (or hold a short position in) any stock named above -- and per the Fool's gold-standard disclosure policy, cannot trade in any such stock for at least 10 days after this article posts. That's just how we roll at the Fool.

You can find Rich on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 694 out of more than 135,000 members.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 3:31 PM, bnoster wrote:

    Am I reading this right: next to last paragraph states AT&T cost less than Verizon and has higher dividend. So, income minded investors should go with AT&T. Next paragraph states if dividends are your thing it's best to go with Verizon. DUH! Can't have it both ways my friend.

    bnostercc@yahoo.com

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 4:28 PM, billoakes wrote:

    Interesting comments on cell service but misses the big, long term "quad play" picture (internet TV, cell, DSL/broadband, wireline voice). AT&T has the local franchise (wireline) in 22 states (mostly high growth sunbelt areas) but Verizon only has 14 states (old northeast). FCC requires network and outside plant pathway sharing for DSL and voice but not for internet TV (called U-verse for AT&T and Fios for Verizon). Makes it way too expensive for one to enter the others wireline franchise area to provide TV service. Also AT&T fully owns their cell network but Verizon only owns half of theirs. I'll take AT&T at the lower price, higher dividend and watch them win the long term "quad play" game.

  • Report this Comment On June 21, 2009, at 12:58 AM, MrTeo wrote:

    So everyone talking about buying AT&T or VZ right?

    so what this will tell us.

    Internet Stimulus Grant Givers Want Community Coalitions

    Jun 19, 2009 09:54:54 (ET)

    By Fawn Johnson

    Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

    WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Commerce are on the verge of publishing guidelines for $7.2 billion in economic stimulus grants for high-speed Internet projects around the country.

    A Commerce Department official said Friday that the agencies are hoping the rules encourage communities to bring their disparate groups into coalitions - hospitals, colleges, public safety groups, community centers, etc.

    "A large broadband pipe allows for lots of silos in various communities to come together," said Mark Seifert, a senior adviser at the Commerce Department's telecommunications unit. "We are trying to incentivize that sort of forward looking thinking for those communities."

    Companies that could benefit from Internet grants and loans include midsized businesses such as Level 3 Communications Inc. (LVLT), wireless companies like Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), and possibly large incumbents like Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) or AT&T Inc. (T).

    Large Internet service providers like Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast Corp. (CMCSA, CMCSK) worry, however, that government grants will be used to fund competitors in areas where they already have invested.

    Seifert said regulators want to "encourage private investment and competition" in grant making, signaling that they might at least be open to funding projects in areas that already have some limited access to the Internet. He didn't elaborate.

    Seifert also said people hoping to win Internet grant money should look to other areas in their communities where economic stimulus money is being spent, such as road projects.

    The Transportation Department is most likely to have in hand "shovel ready" road projects where it would cost relatively little extra cash to lay Internet cable under new asphalt. The economic stimulus measure put $27.5 billion toward highway construction.

    Seifert also said housing projects would be a good place for Internet stimulus money. If the Housing and Urban Development Department is reworking the electrical connections in a housing facility, why not fund a company or nonprofit to wire those units for the Internet at the same time?

    Commerce and USDA share the $7.2 billion for Internet grant and loans, but the two agencies are hoping to make the application process a seamless one for people seeking the money. The two agencies want to produce a common application that will leave the complexities about the source of the funding to their staffs.

    Officials also want to create an easy-to-use, accessible electronic form for the broadband grants.

    "We're trying to simplify this. I want to make sure we underpromise and overperform," Seifert said. Government grants traditionally "come with a lot of strings attached," he said. "Those are things we can't write ourselves out of."

    Seifert spoke at a conference on broadband policy sponsored by legal publisher Pike & Fischer.

    -By Fawn Johnson, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9263; fawn.johnson@dowjones.com

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    June 19, 2009 09:54 ET (13:54 GMT)

  • Report this Comment On June 21, 2009, at 5:30 PM, busterbuddy wrote:

    I use verizon. My company moved to AT&T. Few people I know like AT&T's wireless system. Alot of complaints. But I think they will fix it or they will lose market share.

    I owe T stock, because of the dividend yield. Its the cash I want.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 925127, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 5:02:28 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Why Investors Should Be Excited for a Bank Breakup

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 4:00 PM
AMX $48.04 Up +1.03 +2.19%
America Movil S.A.… CAPS Rating: *****
CHL $49.70 Up +0.23 +0.46%
China Mobile Ltd.… CAPS Rating: *****
S $3.90 Up +0.14 +3.72%
Sprint Nextel Corp CAPS Rating: **
T $26.78 Up +0.76 +2.92%
AT&T, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
TWX $32.10 Up +0.46 +1.45%
Time Warner, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
VZ $31.33 Up +0.90 +2.96%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Closed-end fund: A closed-end fund (CEF) is a mutual fund that trades on a stock exchange like a company stock.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!