How to Beat Risk Before It Beats You

Recs

7

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

In putting together a lifetime financial plan for your investments, you want to balance the risks you take against the returns you earn. But as the last year and a half has shown us, figuring out the right way to accomplish that task is easier said than done.

What is risk?
Most investors assess risk based on the characteristics of the asset classes they hold. Cash investments like money market mutual funds are seen as essentially risk-free; such vehicles are designed with the primary goal of preserving principal, even when doing so requires accepting extremely low returns. Bonds tend to have somewhat higher returns and are thus more volatile and can put principal at risk. Stocks, on the other hand, require investors to accept a much greater chance of substantial losses, but they pay the biggest rewards over time. By choosing a mix of investments, you can control your risk accordingly.

Most of the time, this model of risk management works pretty well, and the various asset classes behave the way people expect them to. But it's far from perfect. Recently, we've seen a number of cases where normal relationships have gone awry.

Are stocks the place to be?
The stock market's plunge has left returns on major stock indexes negative over the past decade or more. Meanwhile, interest rates on Treasury bonds reached extremely low levels last December before bouncing back in recent months. According to some recent research, those low interest rates raised bond prices so high earlier this year that their return over the past 40 years exceeded returns on stocks. That's raised a big controversy over whether stock returns give investors any risk premium at all.

Moreover, nearly all of the assets that typical households own have performed extremely badly in the past couple of years. Home values have dropped sharply in many areas of the country, as have shares of real estate investment trusts. Stocks of all types have performed badly. Commodities investors saw prices plummet late last year, although they've rebounded somewhat since then. Even many bondholders didn't cash in, as corporate bonds performed horribly in 2008.

And within stocks, typical assumptions have failed as well. Many investors rely on large-cap stocks, especially those that pay dividends, to have less volatile price movements than small-cap or international stocks. But plenty of stocks that people would have seen as rock-solid just a couple of years ago suffered huge losses, well beyond the market's losses:

Stock

2-Year Average Annual Return

Dividends in 2007

Current Annual Dividend Rate

AIG (NYSE: AIG)

(85.4%)

$0.73

N/A

Citigroup (NYSE: C)

(74.7%)

$2.16

N/A

Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM)

(91.0%)

$1.80

N/A

U.S. Steel (NYSE: X)

(40.9%)

$0.80

$0.20

Alcoa (NYSE: AA)

(46.8%)

$0.68

$0.12

Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW)

(36.6%)

$1.64

$0.60

General Electric (NYSE: GE)

(41.6%)

$1.15

$0.40

Source: Yahoo! Finance. Current dividend rate is based on most recent dividend paid.

How to handle risk
These examples illustrate why you can't simply rely on old rules of thumb to determine how risky your portfolio is. While we've always been aware that results over short periods of time could differ greatly from historical averages, only now has it started to sink in that traditional return relationships can disappear for years.

Rather than giving up on diversification, though, recent experience supports counting on it even more. If you can't count on even the best-known blue-chip stocks to hold up in a bear market, then that makes small caps and international stocks more attractive -- because as it turns out, they're not necessarily all that riskier than their large-cap counterparts. And anyone who shifted all their money into Treasury bonds earlier this year made exactly the wrong move, as Treasuries have seen huge losses as stocks and commodities bounced sharply off their lows.

You can't afford to rely on outdated methods of controlling investment risk in your portfolio. By understanding that risk takes many forms and can be unpredictable even over significant periods of time, you'll build a portfolio that can work in both good times and bad.

Find out more about dividend stocks here:

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Our Motley Fool Income Investor newsletter seeks out stocks that won't cut their dividends. Find out which stocks we're recommending right now -- it's absolutely free with a 30-day trial when you click here now.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger owns General Electric after buying too early. He's learned his lesson. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy carries no risk.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2009, at 3:25 PM, megabuc wrote:

    If madoff got 150 years for 170 billion, How much time will CITIBANK CEOS GET FOR ONE TRILLION DOLLAR SCAM. Citibank must be closed the FDIC and the FED both get a`F for their watch.

  • Report this Comment On July 04, 2009, at 4:56 PM, IlliniBanker wrote:

    TMF is correct that stocks tend to do better over the long term, but the author ignores the fact that with the current secular economic environment, the "long term" could mean 10 or even 20 years. If you had invested $1000 in the DJIA in 1965, your stocks would still be worth roughly the same in 1982. Meanwhile, inflation would have eaten up all of your dividends and much of your principal. If you had bought 25 ounces of gold or ten acres of farmland in 1965, on the other hand, you would have more than beaten inflation.

    Heck, if you had just invested in CDs or treasuries during the '70s and early '80s, you generally would have beaten the DJIA significantly. If you had gotten 12% on a $1000 10 year CD (which also gave you an early withdrawal-with-penalty option) back in 1980, you would have beaten the DJIA on the '80s bull market without having to do any research on small-caps or dividend stocks.

    Rates are going to have to go up. That's going to hurt stocks and help people who have money in CDs and savings. Series I savings bonds (wait until November to buy), CDs, and savings accounts are really boring and don't yield much right now, but unlike stocks, they have built-in reset buttons. If rates or inflation go up, you can cash them in for only a 1-2% penalty at most. If the same thing happens with stocks, you get multiple contraction and you can lose 20-30%.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 930869, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 6:50:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 4:00 PM
GE $16.07 Down -0.10 -0.62%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
X $45.42 Up +0.24 +0.53%
United States Stee… CAPS Rating: ****
AA $13.64 Up +0.84 +6.56%
Alcoa, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
DOW $28.49 Up +0.41 +1.46%
The Dow Chemical C… CAPS Rating: ****
AIG $31.19 Up +0.35 +1.13%
American Internati… CAPS Rating: **
C $4.10 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
FNM $0.92 Down -0.01 -1.08%
Fannie Mae CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Celanese: Celanese (NYSE: http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/CE.aspx CE) is an integrated global producer of value-added industrial chemicals; a producer of acetyl products, including acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer and polyacetal products; and a global producer of engineered polymers.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!