How to Destroy a Company

Recs

25

A recent Wall Street Journal article pointed out a frightening trend re-emerging on Wall Street as the credit market starts to thaw. Unfortunately, the economically illiterate financial engineers who brought you the last credit bubble have apparently returned … with a vengeance.

And they've brought back with them one of the worst ideas ever to rear its ugly head in the heat of the last credit bubble: Borrowing to pay dividends. If ever there was a completely avoidable mistake that far too often leads to catastrophe, that'd be it.

Unnecessary risk
In that Journal article, aircraft-parts manufacturer TransDigm (NYSE: TDG) was called out for borrowing $425 million, $360 million of which will be paid as a special dividend. That act of financial engineering brought with it a debt downgrade at Moody's to the junk rating "B3." So not only is the company engaged in the extremely cyclical business of making aircraft parts, but it's potentially putting itself in long-term financial peril to make a one-time payout.

Perhaps it hasn't learned the lessons of leveraged failures like Cerberus' debt-fueled buyout of Chrysler, or the bankruptcy that Dex Media went through after borrowing to pay a dividend to its private-equity owners.

A better way to pay dividends
Don't get me wrong. Well-designed dividends are fantastic. Throughout this economic meltdown, I've used changes in companies' payouts as signals of their true financial health. Likewise, the payments themselves have provided important ballast against a stagnant economy. But for a dividend to be a positive for a company and its investors, it needs to have the following characteristics:

1. It needs to be paid out of operating cash flow. When a company borrows to pay a dividend, it's clearly not sustainable, as bondholders will soon tire of taking on excessive risks to reward stockholders. However, a dividend that's paid from operating cash flow has a much higher chance of continuing as long as that business can operate profitably.

2. It should let the company retain financial flexibility. By borrowing to pay a dividend, a company obligates itself to long-term interest coupon payments and eventual principal repayment (or refinancing), for the sake of a single payment. Those coupon payments increase the burden a company must clear to earn a profit every year, and the debt itself reduces a company's ability to borrow cash to expand its business. Contrast that to a dividend paid out of operating earnings, which carries with it no such long-term liability.

3. It ought to drive shareholder-friendly management behaviors. When a company gets serious about its dividend, it starts structuring its operations around ensuring its dividends can continue to be paid for the long haul. That requires the company to prioritize:

  • Delivering cash flows, instead of merely accounting earnings;
  • Making investments that provide profitable growth, rather than empire-building;
  • Using debt judiciously to build the business, rather than merely "lever up"; and
  • Ensuring there's a sufficient cash stash to both pay the dividend and operate the business.

A few names
Here are just a few companies that have consistently raised their dividends over time, and have done so again without taking on extra debt:

Company

Year-Over-Year
Dividend Growth

Payout Ratio

Reduction in Debt, Most Recent 10-K vs. Prior-Year 10-K
(in Millions)

Cash From Operations / Net Income Ratio

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

12%

26%

$141

1.16

Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT)

11%

43%

$675

1.25

Lowe's (NYSE: LOW)

 6%

27%

$620

2.11

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM)

10%

20%

$2,841

3.13

Waste Management (NYSE: WMI)

10%

59%

$11

2.70

Pall Corp. (NYSE: PLL)

13%

33%

$59

1.67

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

By keeping their payout ratios below two-thirds of earnings, they're able to both reward shareholders and ensure the business keeps running smoothly. With cash from operations stronger than earnings, you can rest assured that those dividends are well covered by real business results. And best of all, with both a rising dividend and reduced debt over the past year, these companies have done a great job of rewarding shareholders while simultaneously protecting their businesses.

Only a few are worthy
At Motley Fool Income Investor, we're not interested in the potentially company-destroying results that come from borrowing money to pay one-time dividends. Instead, we actively seek out the strongest regular-dividend-paying companies we can find for our members. Solid companies offering consistent, well-managed dividends provide the cornerstone of our investing philosophy.

If you're tired of being burned by one-time gimmicks and are ready to invest your cash in companies that treat their owners well over the long haul, you can look over our list of "buy first" stocks, free for 30 days. Simply click here -- there’s no obligation.

At the time of publication, Fool contributor Chuck Saletta owned shares of Lowe's, which is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. TransDigm is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems selection. Waste Management is an Income Investor and Inside Value pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 12, 2009, at 5:00 PM, lemoneater wrote:

    Interesting article. TRA is going to have a special dividend but I believe they have a strong cash flow. Are dividends sometimes considered window dressing to attract investors? I can see no other reason why a company would foolishly knock itself out to pay generous dividends it cannot afford.

  • Report this Comment On October 12, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Zade wrote:

    TRA is paying a special dividend to thwart a hostile takeover attempt by CF Industries that they have rejected 3 times. Meanwhile, Agrium is trying to buy CF in what Morningstar calls a much better deal for CF shareholders than CF acquiring TRA. CF has constructed their offer in such a way to prevent THEIR shareholders from having ANY SAY about either deal.

  • Report this Comment On October 12, 2009, at 7:02 PM, TMFOpie wrote:

    lemoneater,

    Lots of time companies controlled by private equity firms will lever up then pay out a dividend to satisfy their big shareholders. It's an immediate payoff that hurts investors down the road and shareholders who are more interested in the long-term health of the company.

    I wrote as much about this for TransDigm because in Hidden Gems we have that on our portfolio candidate list but not in our portfolio. The stock has performed really well over the past year, smoking the market. And that's in not a great year for aeroparts suppliers.

    TDG is a well-run operation that dominates its space in aftermarket parts. Yet this financial engineering does not make me comfortable in the way management/the board looks at the company's cash position. I applaud the return to shareholders; but really, is it just robbing Peter to pay for Paul? Winning investments need to be based on more than that.

    Fool on,

    Andy

    HG co-advisor

  • Report this Comment On October 12, 2009, at 10:03 PM, DownEscalator wrote:

    Zade - I looked seriously at picking up TRA/TNH stock about a month ago and that whole situation with CF Industries looks nothing short of ridiculous.

    I really like TRA/TNH's management and think paying a div. to avoid a hostile takeover is a great move on their part.

  • Report this Comment On October 13, 2009, at 12:11 AM, memoandstitch wrote:

    Again, such a reckless behavior is made possible by...

    the Federal Reserve's low interest rate and long term inflation outlook.

  • Report this Comment On October 13, 2009, at 3:15 AM, rgr04 wrote:

    Companies that can employ excess cash at a good return and at reasonable risk would do well to hold off dividends.

    Some companies do it to support their stock price.

    For a really long term shareholders, Buffett's "look through earnings" makes excellent sense. If a company has better use for the cash, let them do its magic along with the natural powers of compounding.

  • Report this Comment On October 13, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Vjklander wrote:

    What is even worse is Honeywell (HON). They eliminated health care benefits for all future retirees and slashed the 401k match in half again to pay Executive bonuses and the RAISED dividend. As a direct result of this heinous crime, 1/3 of our section have left the company and 1/6 retired before the cutoff date. I'm actively seeking another job myself and expect to leave within a month. This has really riled the NASA customer who has told Honeywell to not even bother submitting any bids on NASA contracts.

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2009, at 4:15 PM, pfxg wrote:

    Chuck,

    You just don't get TransDigm. The company's debt following the special dividend and bond offering brings them back to the level where they have historically operated -- at 4-5x Ebitda. Their strong cash flow had left them with more cash than they could reasonably deploy for acquisitions so they did what a shareholder-friendly company should do - they returned it to shareholders. As for being in an "extremely cyclical business," look at their results. Their niche - proprietary parts with strong aftermarket demand - is not that subject to the industry's cycle. You owe it Motley Fool readers to take another look at TransDigm.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1004973, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 1:19:20 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:02 PM
TDG $42.65 Up +0.87 +2.08%
TransDigm Group, I… CAPS Rating: ****
ABT $53.64 Up +0.68 +1.28%
Abbott Laboratorie… CAPS Rating: *****
XOM $74.38 Down -0.27 -0.36%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
LOW $21.35 Down -0.14 -0.65%
Lowe's Companies,… CAPS Rating: ***
PLL $32.25 Down -0.10 -0.31%
Pall Corp CAPS Rating: ***
WMI $28.50 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Waste Management,… CAPS Rating: *****
ADM $31.62 Up +0.05 +0.16%
Archer Daniels Mid… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Statement of Additional Information: The Statement of Additional Information or SAL is an informational document for mutual funds.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!