The Easiest Way to Become a Millionaire

Recs

45

Sure, there are folks who have become rich finding stocks like Hansen Natural (Nasdaq: HANS) or Celgene (Nasdaq: CELG) when they were micro caps, then staying with them until their market cap is well over $1 billion. Others have become wealthy with smart options plays, still others by discovering high-momentum growth stocks like Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) or Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG) before other investors catch on.

But these complicated, labor-intensive tactics are ones that many investors don't have enough time to master.

I'd like to share with you a simple, easy strategy for becoming wealthy -- and then give you stock recommendations based on it. Although it's simple, it takes discipline to adhere to the rules. But if you follow this advice, you'll be well on your way to a million-dollar portfolio.

Keep it simple
One of the biggest mistakes investors make is complicating the process. Academics have proven that more information doesn't necessarily lead to better decisions -- but it does lead to overconfidence. Even worse, the more time and effort you put into researching, analyzing, and deciding whether to buy a stock, the more likely you are to buy it -- even if it's a horrible stock after all.

Overconfidence and overcommitment are counterproductive in investing -- and it's why keeping your investment criteria simple and easy can help you avoid falling into these traps.

What sort of criteria am I suggesting? Just two steps:

1. Find strong, long-term dividend-paying companies.
Dividends are the surest gains you can find in any market environment. As Bloomberg recently reported, even though the 10-year trailing return of the Dow Jones Industrial Average was negative through Sept. 30, when you factored in dividends, the return was actually a positive 18%.

What's more, between January 1926 and December 2004, 41% of the S&P 500's total return came from dividends. Without dividends, a $10,000 investment in 1926 would have become $1,013,000 by 2004 -- a remarkable return, to be sure. But with dividends, $10,000 would have become $24,113,000.

It's best to look for companies with a long history of paying out dividends. If a company only has a few years of dividend history under its belt, those payouts might be cut or suspended to fuel future growth -- as happened at Whole Foods (Nasdaq: WFMI) and DryShips (Nasdaq: DRYS) during this bear market.

Of course, that didn't stop many former stalwarts from cutting their payouts over the past year. So it's also wise to find companies with a culture of insider ownership and enduring demand. And you should also find companies with predictable, sufficient free cash flow, so you can be reasonably sure these dividends will continue to be paid. This is often easier said than done, but just below I'll tell you whom I look to for help in this regard.

But now for the hard part ...

2. Hold forever.
The strongest of dividend-paying companies raise their dividend over time. So when you hold one for long enough, you eventually reach a point where you are making more money annually in dividends than you initially invested in the company.

This is hastened when you reinvest your dividends back into the company, with each dividend purchasing even more shares of the company, meaning even more payout at the next quarterly dividend.

So long as the business continues to perform, and the company continues to maintain or raise its payouts, the simplest and oftentimes most lucrative approach is to remain an owner and collect your dividends.

Implement this strategy today
Motley Fool dividend expert James Early has seven "buy first" stocks for members of his Motley Fool Income Investor newsletter service, and they have an average yield of 3.8%. These stocks are, in his opinion, timeless investments that should serve as the foundation for a dividend-paying portfolio -- stocks you can feel comfortable holding for decades.

One of the companies on this list is legendary dividend payer Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), which is yielding 3.3%. This company, which has paid out a dividend since 1944, not only has a long dividend history, but also has a long history of increasing its dividend. Over the past five years alone, it has grown its dividend annually by an average 12%. Better yet, it's trading well below James' estimate of its intrinsic value.

We've seen more than a fair share of dividend blowups over the past year, but if you look for the three criteria I outlined above when looking for dividend-paying companies -- insider ownership, a company with enduring demand, and sufficient free cash flow -- you are following the easiest way to become a millionaire.

I invite you to read more about why James believes Johnson & Johnson is a strong core dividend holding, check out the six other stocks on his "buy first" list, and read more about how he uncovers top-notch dividend investments, completely free for 30 days. Click here for more information.

Adam J. Wiederman doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned above. Hansen Natural and Intuitive Surgical are Motley Fool Rule Breakers selections. Amazon.com and Whole Foods are Stock Advisor recommendations. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor recommendation. The Fool's disclosure policy is outlined here.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 6:24 PM, rgia0202 wrote:

    Forgive my ignorance, but wouldnt I earn more then 3.3% on my money by just putting it in a term deposit?

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Dannysea wrote:

    I am one to hold. The critical issue in all this can be summed up in Adam's one paragraph. For my Strength has been also my Weakness...

    "So long as the business continues to perform, and the company continues to maintain or raise its payouts, the simplest and oftentimes most lucrative approach is to remain an owner and collect your dividends."

    Again, as long as the company performs...

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 7:13 PM, feldmail wrote:

    Your article states, "Academics have proven that more information doesn't necessarily lead to better decisions." I have never heard such claptrap in my life!! Just analyze that statement and anyone can esily see how patently false it really is. I know; it is based upon the "random Walk Theory" and similar garbage.

    The fact that academics have "proven" this just proves the old adage: " If you can't do -- teach."

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 9:20 PM, ecoloney wrote:

    A $Million isn't what it used to be. My dearly departed father at age 86 used to say *HIS* father used to say, "A dollar is only worth 10 cents" and that was 20 years ago. It's time to think of being a "millionaire" when you have $10M.

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 9:47 PM, porchguy wrote:

    Foregoing my lack of "TRUE" investment knowledge, I have just one question.

    David has "ATVI" in is 'Core' bracket.

    It pays 'NO DIVIDEND', its PE is ridiculusly high, and the stock is now moving downward, again. But, then so has the maket the last few days.

    So, with what was said in ths article "The Easiest way to Become a Millionare", how does that stock even fit in? It has been in retreat since the new "BUY" went up on it in David's Core Picks.

    Please help me out on this stocks position to make money.

    Thanks in advance

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 10:48 PM, porchguy wrote:

    This article says nothing about penny stocks not even if you read between the lines.

    This article is all about companies not only paying a fair dividend, but also being able to pay it year after year with increases, even if just slightly.

    And even like it was said in this article about being careful with companies paying dividends. Look at General Motors that less than 2 years ago was paying $2 per share and look now.

    I know there is always an exception in the large crowd, but just think of the people that have been sitting on hundreds of thousands of shares thru generations and now not only do they not get those millionare yearly dividend checks, but their stock ended up being worthless.

    So, like the article says, dividend stocks are a nice way to compound your holdings, but make sure you keep an eye on the company.

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2009, at 7:13 AM, f00lsgoldy wrote:

    Strong, long-term dividend paying companies sounds like the dividend aristocrats?

    "Dividend aristocrats are companies in the S&P 500 that have increased dividend payouts to shareholders every year for the last 25 years."

    http://www.TopYields.nl/Top-dividend-yields-of-Dividend-Aris...

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2009, at 8:56 AM, TMFDonauschwaben wrote:

    rgia0202,

    You're right -- but with that, you have no possibility of capital gains, as tends to coincide with strong dividend-payers over time.

    feldmail,

    As much as I agree with you that some academics are lacking in real knowledge, I don't think you can completely dismiss an idea because a scholar came up with it. In fact, the "scholar" I specifically had in mind was Steven Crist, a legendary horse bettor. He determined that the more variables an individual had in front of him when betting on horses had NO impact whatsoever on his success going up or down. But the more variables did give these bettors a greater (and false) sense of confidence. I think it's wise to be wary of too high a level of confidence, and that was the point I was trying to make.

    ecoloney,

    You're right -- $1 million ain't what it used to be. But it is a stepping stone on your way to $10 million...

    porchguy,

    I think you're referring to a stock David has recommended in Motley Fool Stock Advisor. I'm not going to discount David's belief or recommendation at all. He is an excellent investor, with probably the most successful track record of anyone at the Fool. But David and I have different investing strategies. He's more a "growth" investor -- finding best in class companies on the cutting edge of new technology and holding them through thick and thin. I'm more a "value" investor, looking for undervalued and out of favor stocks, as well as holding a solid amount of strong dividend stocks.

    Thanks, all, for your comments!

    -- Adam

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2009, at 10:02 AM, howboutme wrote:

    Would the MF please refrain from telling me how to be a millionaire over a 50 year period if I had done this or that. By the time I have $10,000 to invest, I would probably be in my twenties. That makes me a millionaire when I hit my seventies. Can't really enjoy it at that age. I really want to do it in 10 years..... that would be real advice.

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Turfscape wrote:

    Huh...I always heard it this way:

    "The easiest way to become a millionaire is to start as a billionaire and buy a sports franchise"

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2009, at 10:08 AM, TMFDonauschwaben wrote:

    howboutme,

    The fact of the matter is, unless you hit the lottery, turning, going from $0 to $1 million in 10 years is probably not gonna happen. Slow and steady investing is the best (and safest) way to go.

    Turfscape,

    That is true too -- though I'm not sure how many billionaires in the market for sports team are reading my columns.

    -- Adam

  • Report this Comment On October 29, 2009, at 3:10 AM, mbhoch wrote:

    Wow, I've never seen so many people missing the point. The guy is not a freaking miracle worker, he's just telling you how the proven millionares have done it in the past. How do you think WEB made billions? Do you think it happened over night? No, he was very patient and it took decades. That's just the way it is, most stocks don't just return 4000% in a year. Sure you can get lucky and buy something that skyrockets, but there is no way to teach luck or he would've wrote an article on that. It's just sound and safe advice, take it or don't take. The fact is you shouldn't be relying on people to just hand you "secret" that will make you rich (howboutme), that's just niave. This is a business for grown ups, if you want to become rich, work for for it and do your research. There are no handouts, there is only advice, I suggest you take what you can from it.

  • Report this Comment On October 29, 2009, at 10:30 AM, TMFDonauschwaben wrote:

    mbhoch,

    Well said! Glad you were able to get the right take-away!

    -- Adam

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 8:31 PM, dav2010 wrote:

    Concept: Buy dividend paying stocks with a history of raising their dividends and reinvest the dividends, and you too will be rich..

    Yes, but!!! It takes a long time to pull it off. Each reinvestment reduces your diversification. No stock goes up in a straight line. There will be dips and valleys. You will need strong intestinal fortitude to hold, especially when your position takes a nose dive. Will you continue to hold when a drop of 50% takes a 100% gain to recover? Will you hold because you hope everything will eventually come back? Will your opinion of the stock be, to paraphrase Samuel Johnson, the triumph of hope over experience? What about the impediment of taxes? They are going to go back up next year. The longer you hold the more the Treasury gets.

    This works, if you are lucky enough to get in on a bull early, if you are nimble enough to get out at the top, and don't take yourself too seriously – remember, you are lucky, not smart.

    My wife and I made a bundle in three high yielding stocks that went parabolic as oil prices went up. We were not diversified, so we knew we were taking a big risk. Eventually, as prices peaked, we took our profits. Had we ridden the stocks down, we would have lost about 60% of our gains. The stocks were still giving high dividends, but those dividends would have been no substitute for the loss the stock price took.

    dav

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 9:11 PM, divididgood wrote:

    This article was very insightful for me because it's exactly what I've been doing. I'm only 19 right now, started investing a while back with DRiPs. When I see posts about divdends and the companies I invest in and the strategies I use it makes me very cheerful. I started out buying into PG, PAYX, PEPSI, my 3 P's of the Portfolio and now have moved into other good dividend paying stocks (JNJ, SO, 3M and some Growth-type DRiPs) and im perfectly fine with it. Being so young I only have a couple hundred bucks a month to spare to invest other then my Thrift Savings Plan @ 20% so I just continue to purchase shares at little increments and when I get more money I might move into some more risky stocks but for now im keeping with my dividend payers and building my portfolio day by day.

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 9:55 PM, Chowdamelon wrote:

    Divididgood, you appear to be a sharp kid(I'm old), but I wish I had your sense at your age. Thru blind luck I have done ok thru the last two years, thru timing, did not get out at bottom, but close enough. I will not get out at the top on stocks, but close enough. I avoided mutual funds because of the annual charges, which can really add up over 10-20 years. I created my own " mutual fund" , comprised of 25 stocks, some of which are ETF's. I am way too heavy in Non USA oil and gas companies, but my dividends range from 8.5% to 14%. Since my belief is that the markets overall are not going to rocket either up or down. Seems like a no brainer to me. Good luck/fortune to you all

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2009, at 2:15 AM, Ozcutty wrote:

    The other tack is investing in FFH or MKL or BRK. You get greater capital growth because they re-invest for you and the tax man doesn't get a cut. Only problem is if you need cash for something, your gonna have to sell some shares and have a capital gain to report.

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2009, at 6:47 PM, msftgev wrote:

    Huh...I always heard it this way:

    "The easiest way to become a millionaire is to start as a billionaire and buy a sports franchise"

    Can't belieive I found a Cubs joke in this article:)

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 2:32 AM, JohnQuill wrote:

    I suppose that there are well over a million ways to become a millionaire, and probably a lot more ways to NOT become one.

    A lot of people, especially younger people, don't understand the power of TIME. Even when you DO understand it, it can still seem rather daunting.

    In fact, to someone who has no "connections" such as a rich relative, the idea of creating or building wealth can seem like a very foreign or abstract concept.

    Let's do a little exercise in mathematics and time: Start by saving one penny on the first day of any month, and then double the amount saved every day, and do it for one entire month.

    For example, if we begin on December 1st, this means that on the first day, we have saved one cent, and on the second day, we have saved a total of three cents (two plus the original one). Day three we add four more pennies, and therefore we now have seven cents total. We're rich! What "ballpark" figure do you think will be in your piggy bank come the end of a month? Write down the figure that first pops into your head.

    A lot of people think they could do this. After all, it's just pennies: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 etc., and so after a whole week, we're only adding 128 cents to the piggy bank. Do you think this could ever reach a million dollars? No way, not in just one month, you might figure. Figure again! (Incidentally, it's easy to compute since many calculators have a y^x function - just punch in 2^30 for one month, and don't forget to divide that result by 100 to convert pennies to dollars.)

    Actually, on day 27 is when you'll surpass the million dollar mark. Oh really? YES REALLY! Okay, so there's no way that any investment is going to double every day, but if you *could* get just "thirty doubles" in a lifetime, then this exercise shows that all you need to start with is ONE COOL PENNY to grow yourself an even cooler TEN million DOLLARS.

    If you are still under age 35, imagine that each one of those above "days" is actually a year, so instead of thirty days, look ahead thirty years. Play with the numbers, and you'll see that what "falls out" of the equation is how important it really is to: Start Early, Dollar Cost Average, and Reinvest your Dividends.

    -jqt-

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 6:52 PM, rgif102478 wrote:

    The best way to take a million out of the market

    is to start with two million. Bob Gifford

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 7:19 PM, CASTNAVY wrote:

    Thinkin 'bout trading Dynegy for Sirius.:) Since June I am up 100% basically day trading. DYN, OMX, CAR, BGP and a bit of FAZ. Like all lucky investors instead of keeping 25-30% on the side I went the full monte with BGP and DYN AT 2.55 AND 2.25. A FEW DAYS AGO@%$$$#@ 9000 LOSS LEAVES A 80% GAIN. Could USE SOME ADVICE WITH BGP - I am tempted to sell and buy S? Despite getting burned by FTWR!

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 7:22 PM, CASTNAVY wrote:

    to msftgv - I made a move for Irsays daughter - no luck. Just pissed off my wife and Foyt Jr.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 2:26 AM, markinva0304 wrote:

    Of course he is right. This is EXACTLY my plan for some time. I have several dividend stocks, in fact it is a major motivator of my buying the stock. Sure I look out the history and do my homework, the dividend and reinvestment of the dividend back into that stock directly or a similar one to build that one up.

    You do need some starting capital I would say to get this rolling. Think 10k minimum, use it like a bank account as I do and write checks and use your debit card straight from your cash not used in the account.

    So I also not only find the divy stock, I then margin up on it, meaning I buy twice what my buying power is for it, double the divy, usually the margin interest is 7% or lower depending on the amount. So say I have a stock or two that is at 16% and 26% respectively(paying dividends out monthly btw, and yes that is the rate I get with them) that amount would then double since I also bought on margin making it 32% and 52%, then subtract the 7% interest you are going to have to pay a year and you get 25% and 45%. But then with margin, you also reinvest DOUBLE the amount since you get twice the buying power, and if 7% is the interest rate, take that to the bank all day long.

    Easy as Pie...and why I make XX,XXX a year off of dividends and slowly creeping up each month. Hold for the LONG HAUL and reinvest.

    Statistically you can almost plot this out based off the dividend payment, and I plan on retiring by age 35 making 10k a month off dividends alone.

    The stock mentioned by the author is a mere 3.3% which sucks btw, look at another major large cap...T. Pays out over 6%, which is low to me as well but stable.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1021114, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 3:00:39 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $62.31 Up +0.37 +0.60%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
HANS $35.42 Up +0.31 +0.88%
Hansen Natural Cor… CAPS Rating: ****
WFMI $26.36 Down -0.61 -2.26%
Whole Foods Market… CAPS Rating: ***
ISRG $276.44 Down -2.24 -0.80%
Intuitive Surgical… CAPS Rating: ****
DRYS $6.29 Down -0.24 -3.68%
DryShips, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $129.66 Up +0.67 +0.52%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
CELG $54.91 Up +0.36 +0.66%
Celgene Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Immediate or cancel: Immediate or Cancel (IOC) is a condition a trader or investor can include in his/her purchase or sale of a stock

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!