Frightening News About Dividend Stocks

Recs

8

For dividend lovers, 2008 and its aftermath were brutal.

Dividend cuts that year were announced at the fastest pace in more than 50 years. Check out some of the companies that cut their dividends substantially in the past year or two:

Company

Dividend Cut

Citigroup

98%

Fannie Mae

80%

Vulcan Materials

49%

Dow Chemical

64%

General Electric

68%

Those aren't even modest little trims. They're whoppers. And for some of these companies, cuts like this haven't happened in a long time. In its 112-year history, Dow Chemical, for example, had never cut its dividend. For General Electric, you'd have to go back 71 years to find the most recent reduction. Other companies, like Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO), are still considering cutting their dividend.

The news gets even scarier. Ned Davis Research assessed S&P 500 stock returns from January 1972 to April 2009, based on companies' dividend policies:

Category

Annual Gain, 1972 to 2009

$100 Became ...

Dividend Cutters or Eliminators

0.5%

$120

Non-Dividend Payers

0.7%

$129

S&P 500

6.2%

$941

Dividend Payers With No Change in Dividends

6.2%

$941

Dividend Growers and Initiators

8.7%

$2,246

Monthly data, Jan. 31, 1972, to April 30, 2009. Copyright 2009 Ned Davis Research, Inc. Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. All rights reserved.

That data may frighten investors who've just watched blue chips such as GE and Dow Chemical reduce their payouts to shareholders. Let's examine the implications:

  • S&P 500 companies that cut or eliminated their dividends are dead last in terms of total returns. So you'll want to avoid dividend blowups; to do so, be extra mindful of high payout ratios, companies with industry headwinds, and dividend payers with iffy track records.
  • Non-dividend payers weren't all that much better: They turned $100 into just $129 over that time frame.
  • By a substantial margin, dividend growers or initiators were the best in breed among S&P 500 stocks.

Are 37 years not enough for you? In "The Secret of Dividends," my colleague Shannon Zimmerman explained that between January 1926 and December 2006, "41% of the S&P 500's total return was due not to the price appreciation of the stocks in the index, but to the dividends its companies paid out."

What to do
Clearly, dividends cut both ways. The lesson, then, is to focus on companies that have a history of increasing their dividends. Look for companies that keep paying you back, more and more. Visa (NYSE: V), for example, doesn't have a long dividend history, but it did just increase its dividend by 19%. ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) recently upped its payout by 6%.

A longer history of dividend increases is even more attractive. After all, some companies have been paying out for more than 100 years! Here are two ways to start seeking reliable dividend-hikers:

1. Look for overachievers. You can find such companies through the Dividend Achiever index, which features companies that have upped their dividends for at least 10 years in a row.

2. Screen. The Dividend Achievers list features more than 275 U.S. companies, so you'll then want to narrow down your search. Here are some companies that meet the following screening criteria:

  • They are each Dividend Achievers.
  • They have at least a three-star rating from our Motley Fool CAPS community.
  • They have increased their payouts by at least 8% per year for the past five years.

Company

CAPS Rating (out of 5)

Dividend Yield

5-Year Dividend Growth Rate

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)

*****

3.3%

12%

IBM (NYSE: IBM)

***

1.8%

26%

Abbott Labs

*****

3.2%

9%

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

****

2.3%

9%

Medtronic (NYSE: MDT)

****

2.3%

19%

Sources: Indxis, Motley Fool CAPS.

3. See our favorite stocks. We'd love to introduce you to many promising dividend payers in our Income Investor service, which you can try for free. On average, its picks are beating the market handily and boast an average dividend yield of more than 4%. Click here to learn more about a 30-day trial.

Last lessons
Finally, a glance at the returns of non-dividend payers should drive home how much your portfolio might suffer if it doesn't have some solid dividend payers in it. Note, after all, how close the returns are for dividend cutters and non-payers. There have been time periods in which dividend cutters still came out ahead of non-payers. Ignore the awesome power of dividends at your own portfolio's peril.

Already an Income Investor member? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was originally published on May 19, 2009. It has been updated..

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Johnson & Johnson and General Electric. Vulcan Materials is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor pick. The Motley Fool owns shares of Medtronic. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 03, 2009, at 8:13 AM, definer wrote:

    According to Yahoo, VISA's annual payout for dividends is a minuscule 7/10 of 1%. Why are they even mentioned in the article??

  • Report this Comment On November 03, 2009, at 8:30 AM, TMFeatnbybears wrote:

    Seems to not consider what has happened to the financial industry. GE cuts were directly related and I expect will be temporary (couple years)

    There are still excellent dividend payers out there, VZ, DD, NM and with the price of energy moving, I expect that the Canadian oil and gas stocks will return to their high payouts.

  • Report this Comment On November 03, 2009, at 12:04 PM, georcole wrote:

    definer,

    It says in the article that Visa has only just started paying a dividend as opposed to some other companies that have been paying dividends for many years. The article does not say that Visa is a great dividend payer. The point that Selena is making is that you should look at how long the company has been paying out dividends, not just how much they are paying.

    In 30 years Visa may be able to say that they have been paying out dividends for 31 years. Who knows. It is also easier to maintain paying a dividend that is smaller than one that is larger. In the future Visa may increase their dividend and pay out 3% or more, but only time will tell.

  • Report this Comment On November 05, 2009, at 3:37 PM, rharmelink wrote:

    I'm curious how you'd contrast that study with this one:

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=946448

    It covers a different time frame (1990-2006) and over a larger stock universe (S&P 1500). And it's methodology is comparing companies against each other at a point-in-time instead of how dividend streams of an individual companies changes over time.

    It's numbers indicate payout ratio is more important than yield itself. But certainly a company with a high payout ratio would be unlikely to be a mainstay in the "dividend growers" category.

    The disturbing thing to me is that it has non-dividend payers beating the S&P 500, which would be a significantly different result than the numbers you cite from Ned Davis Research.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1029648, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:32:18 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $62.31 Up +0.37 +0.60%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
V $80.00 Down -0.18 -0.22%
Visa, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
XOM $74.38 Down -0.27 -0.36%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
COP $52.08 Down -0.48 -0.91%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****
IBM $126.96 Down -0.58 -0.45%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ***
VLO $16.47 Up +0.11 +0.67%
Valero Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****
MDT $39.62 Up +0.01 +0.03%
Medtronic, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!