Big Bucks for the Risk-Averse

Recs

2

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

A financial advisor recently told me that the stock market is as risky as "gambling at a casino." He argued that you'd be better off shunning stocks and mutual funds in favor of market-linked CDs, equity-indexed annuities, and equity-linked life insurance. While I can't entirely agree with his concerns, there's some kernel of truth to them. The market can be volatile, and it has yielded long periods of lackluster returns. But unlike a spin at the roulette wheel, the stock market isn't a game.

Wall Street trades in shares of real, bricks-and-mortar companies, operated by flesh-and-blood human beings. For the most part, these enterprises sell actual products or services, generating revenue and, ideally, profit. And for every extra-risky, super-volatile small company in the market, there are sturdy, stable giants such as PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP) or National Grid (NYSE: NGG), which provide enduring products and vital services.

The "safer" path
As for the less risky investment vehicles the aforementioned advisor advocated, well, they're not all they're cracked up to be. Most will offer you just a portion of the stock market's advance. They often won't pass along dividend income to you from the stocks in the indexes they track. The income that some will generate for you will be taxed at your full income tax rate -- potentially quite a bit higher than the long-term capital gains rate of 15% for most folks. These investments can also tie up your money for long periods, giving you little flexibility.

Running the numbers
The kinds of returns these alternatives to stocks will give you may not help you retire the way you want to. Remember that the stock market has averaged about 10% annually over long periods, and that your average will likely be a bit different over your particular investing time frame. But investing in these "safer" options could leave you with a far smaller average return of 5% or less. That can have a huge impact on your final savings:

Average annual growth rate

$6,000 invested annually for 25 years becomes

3%

$225,300

5%

$300,700

8%

$473,700

10%

$649,100

12%

$896,000

15%

$1.47 million

25%

$7.91 million

Clearly, the growth rate matters. How much of a nest egg do you think you'll need to retire comfortably? According to our Rule Your Retirement newsletter, if you want your nest egg to last, aiming to withdraw about 4% of it annually (adjusting for inflation over time) is a smart move. To see what kind of nest egg you'll want, multiply your desired annual income by 25. Want $60,000? Aim for $1.5 million. Will $40,000 be enough? Then $1 million will suffice.

Clearly, many of the nest eggs in the table above won't provide many people with much in retirement. If you're among those staring at a puny expected nest egg, you don't have to settle for that. Many experts have agreed that you're often better off avoiding the sort of play-it-safe investments I mentioned above; instead, stick your long-term money in good stocks and mutual funds.

Better returns with limited risk
Fortunately, you can potentially boost the growth rate on your portfolio beyond that of "safer" investments without taking big risks on upstart companies that lack established track records. Solid dividend-paying stocks are one great way to combine current income with future growth. If a stock pays you a 3% yield, grows over time on top of that, and keeps increasing its dividends, it could be a highly effective way to build wealth. Check out these candidates for further research:

Company

Recent Yield

5-Year Average Dividend Growth Rate

BP (NYSE: BP)

5.7%

14%

Waste Management (NYSE: WM)

3.6%

10%

Total (NYSE: TOT)

5.2%

9%

Exelon (NYSE: EXC)

4.4%

11%

Maxim Integrated Products (NYSE: MXIM)

4.5%

20%

Data: Yahoo! Finance.

Dividends are never guaranteed, but some are darn reliable. And while there are situations in which market-linked CDs would pay greater short-term returns, the odds are good that such CDs will fall well short of what dividend stocks will earn in the future.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

To see a list of dividend payers we currently recommend, take a free trial of our Motley Fool Income Investor newsletter.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of PepsiCo and Maxim Integrated Products. National Grid, PepsiCo, and Total are Income Investor selections. Try any of our investing newsletters free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 3:05 AM, mkenn7095 wrote:

    This woman (Selena) who wrote the above article has NO right to post this. She has ZERO experience in dealing with clients or designing income plans. See her resume below...'taking old ladies to Burger King for onion rings?'...Yes, this REALLY is in her resume below. This is what's wrong with the media today...a bunch of 'big mouthed' and inexperienced reporters who offer their opinion instead of solid advice. The facts are this: I have 15 years in the financial services industry as an SEC licensed Registered Investment Advisory firm. Note...I OWN the firm. I'm also a rep of the firm. Also, I put clients in TONS of Index Annuities as you read about above. The FACT is the clients in Fixed Index Annuities have never lost a SINGLE DIME in 2 STOCK MARKET DISASTERS, while people who take Selena's advice are having to GO BACK TO WORK because they took unnecessary risk in the stock market. Please do your homework Selena, and learn about my industry and how to properly plan for a client's money in retirement before composing such a poisonous and incorrect article. And Selena, I do have some advice...get some clients! (See Selena's resume below....)

    Selena Maranjian prepares the Fool's syndicated newspaper column, writes articles for Fool.com, has coordinated the Fool's annual Foolanthropy charity drive, and has written a number of Fool books, among other things.

    She sports a B.A. in anthropology from Brown University, a master's in teaching from Brown, and an M.B.A. from Wharton. Before arriving at Fool Intergalactic HQ way back in 1996, she taught high school history in Maine, amused herself at an administrative post at Harvard, and worked briefly in the "real world" in Manhattan.

    Selena can usually be found offering unsolicited advice, reading, watching TV and movies, playing games, or driving old ladies to Burger King for onion rings.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 5:06 PM, IlliniBanker wrote:

    I have worked in the industry for three years, and I've watched people go from assuming that stock prices can't drop more than 10% in a year to going to panic to going back to believing the same thing. In other words, I've learned that stocks aren't ALWAYS a great investment.

    I think people would take TMF's articles on general investing more seriously if the firm didn't take a permanently bullish attitude on the stock market. The DJIA is up more than 50% from its March lows. To most value investors, that's a sell signal unless there's a huge improvement in the fundamentals.

    I disagree with the previous poster's view on variable rate annuities. They're loaded with fees. A much better deal right now is Series I Savings Bonds, which protect buyers against inflation, are backed by the federal government, and can be redeemed at any time for a modest penalty after 12 months. If you invest right now, you get a better rate than you would from a CD- that's probably the reason the federal government is limiting purchases to $10K per person per year.

    SELENA- start taking a more balanced view on the stock market. It's not ALWAYS the best investment (CC: investors in August, 2008), and there are other compelling alternatives, too. Promise me that if the fed raises rates several percentage points in a year or two and the DJIA is still above 10K, you'll write an article advocating CDs or TIPS.

    Yes, you can get 11% from the stock market, but anyone who puts 100%- or even 75%- of their portfolio in stock is asking for trouble.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 5:51 PM, truthisntstupid wrote:

    Hey! Anyone out there care what this man with an agenda says? There is NOTHING wrong with Selena's article. There are high-risk AND low-risk behaviors in stock market investing. I make not quite $9 an hour and I'm building a fairly safe dividend income portfolio.

    So what's she lying about?

    That "most will offer you only a portion of the market's advance?"

    That "they often won't pass along dividend income to you in the indexes they track?"

    That "they can also tie up your money for long periods. giving you little flexibility?"

    That "the income some will generate for you will be taxes at your full income-tax rate?"

    You sell safety - and collect commissions. She's selling nothing. WHAT IS SHE LYING ABOUT?

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 6:09 PM, truthisntstupid wrote:

    By the way, foe every thousand dollars I give you, will you send me a $68 check in the mail every year...STARTING NOW? That's what I'm getting. And that's AFTER commissions and fees. You can't do that? Oh well. Please keep paying your utility bills...I'll get it from you WITHOUT paying your commission.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 3:16 PM, IlliniBanker wrote:

    "Hey! Anyone out there care what this man with an agenda says? There is NOTHING wrong with Selena's article."

    Both statements have agendas. It's easy to see Ken's agenda, but it's harder for you to see Selena's equities agenda. The fact that someone has an agenda doesn't mean you shouldn't care what they say; it just means that you should evaluate their statements more critically. TMF knows that if people give up on the stock market, they won't subscribe to their newsletters. That's fine; I just want to make sure Selena doesn't cast direct equity investing as a silver bullet that everyone should put 100% of their money into.

    "By the way, foe every thousand dollars I give you, will you send me a $68 check in the mail every year...STARTING NOW? "

    Series I savings bonds (which bankers make less money off of than they make off of you buying your utilities stocks) paid $55 annual-equivalent for six months for every $1000 invested if you had bought back in May. Is the extra 1.3% worth it for the risk that comes with utilities? (And utilities can be risky- especially in inflationary environments- take a look at what happens to a utility's stock when it has to cut dividends).

    Nobody here is saying that you should sell all of your stocks and stick it into CDs or savings bonds. It's stupid to put all of your eggs in one basket- either savings bonds OR stocks. The point, though is that TMF has a vested interest in getting you into the stock market (so you will keep reading its articles and newsletters). I have a vested interest in getting you into mutual funds. Note that I DON'T have a vested interest in getting you into Series I Savings Bonds. I just want to make sure investors like you get a balanced picture so they can figure out the best way to balance their portfolios between stock and other investments.

    Please don't put all of your eggs in one basket. You shouldn't put 100% of your retirement money in the stock market. Make sure you play a conservative game with some of your savings, and one way to do that for many investors might be Series I Savings Bonds which protect you from inflation and are guaranteed by the US Treasury to never lose value.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1040302, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 5:16:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
BP $57.83 Down -0.80 -1.36%
BP plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
EXC $46.81 Up +0.42 +0.91%
Exelon Corp CAPS Rating: *****
NGG $53.72 Down -0.43 -0.79%
National Grid plc… CAPS Rating: *****
PEP $62.08 Up +0.20 +0.32%
PepsiCo, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
TOT $61.91 Down -0.88 -1.40%
Total SA. (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
WM $32.30 Up +0.13 +0.40%
Waste Management,… CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Mortgage backed securities: Banks that write mortgages can keep them on their books but can also package them together in Mortgage backed securities (MBS) in order to sell the risk and returns to institutional investors or other companies via credit default swaps.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!