The Next 2 Dividend Blowups?

You may have heard that dividend stocks have significantly outperformed their stingier counterparts since 1972. You may have heard that the vast majority of the market's historical gains have come from dividends. And you may have heard that dividend payers are the best stocks to own during bear markets.

That's all true. In fact, during market downturns, dividend stocks outperform by as much as 1% to 1.5% per month.

But before you dive in and start buying dividend stocks, there's something you need to know.

Hold your horses
Dividend payers aren't all gumdrops and rainbows, as shareholders of dividend-slashers know all too well.

In 2009, S&P 500 companies skipped a record $52.6 billion in dividend payments. To avoid the next dividend implosion, you've got to keep an eye on a dividend payer's overall strength -- and its ability to pay those vaunted dividends. So as you're looking for dividend stocks for a bear market, keep an eye out for these red flags:

• Extremely high yield
• Industry headwinds
• Spotty track record
• High payout ratio

Extremely high yield
A yield that seems too good to be true usually is. An extraordinarily high yield is tempting, but such yields tend to show up when a stock has been beaten down -- which means investors don't have confidence in it.

When Citigroup (NYSE:C) announced its first dividend cut in January 2008, for example, the stock was "yielding" 8%. Since then, the stock plunged, and the company ultimately had to cut its dividend to $0.01 in accordance with its bailout terms.

Industry headwinds
If an industry comes under attack -- as happens in cyclical industries and during economic crises -- there may not be any earnings to distribute, leading to dividend cuts or suspensions.

Investors looking to collect dividends over the next several decades from cyclical industries like energy may want to consider that, of all the S&P 500 members of the energy sector -- a group that includes such varied stalwarts as Tesoro (NYSE:TSO), Halliburton (NYSE:HAL), and XTO (NYSE:XTO) -- only one, ExxonMobil, has managed to raise its dividend for more than 25 consecutive years.

Spotty track record
Companies with a checkered history of dividend payments aren't the strongest candidates for investment -- especially in a bear market, when external factors may strain their resources. Companies with a long and steady history of dividend increases, on the other hand, have demonstrated their reliability and are less likely to expose their investors to massive losses.

Intel's (NASDAQ:INTC) scale advantage over Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE:AMD) has given it the stability to raise its dividend since it was first instituted in 1992. By contrast, luxury grocer Whole Foods paid its first dividend in 2004 -- and, as a result of industry headwinds, suspended its payments in 2008.

Of course, when history meets headwinds, sometimes the headwinds prevail. Despite nearly 100 years of maintaining or raising its dividend under its belt, Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) proved unable to shield itself from the industry headwinds this time around, and it had to cut its dividend last year.

High payout ratio
A company's payout ratio -- usually calculated as dividends divided by net income -- is one of the most commonly used metrics to determine whether it can afford to continue paying its dividend at the same rate. A high payout ratio suggests that a company is returning the vast majority of its earnings to shareholders, and therefore may not have enough left over to fund future operations -- risking cut or suspended payments down the line.

Another good metric is dividends divided by free cash flow. Net income is an accounting construction that captures the gist of a company's operations, but it doesn't reflect how much cash a company actually has left over from its operations to cut your check.

Consider ruling out companies with a ratio greater than 80%, or those with negative free cash flow.

Two companies risking a blowup
So which companies will likely be the next dividend blowups? According to the above criteria, possibly these two:

Data from Yahoo! Finance and Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

While their yields are only moderately high, their free cash flow payout suggest they may not be able to afford those payouts.

Like many foreign companies, Chemical Mining's dividend can vary somewhat depending on net income. Still, the company isn't generating nearly enough free cash flow to maintain the heightened level it paid out last year, and its plans to continue its ambitious capital expenditure program will be a drag on free cash flow for at least another two years.

It's a similar story for CPFL, the Brazilian utility giant. Management has a stated policy of paying at least 50% of its net income in the form of dividends, but it tends to pay around twice that amount. Add in huge commitments to capital expenditures, and you have a company that is paying out way more cash in dividends than it takes in.

The silver lining ...
Dividend stocks have a history of putting money in investors' pockets, but choosing the right dividend stocks for a down market is critical to protecting your portfolio. Considering these warning signs of an unsustainable dividend will help you to achieve those golden returns dividends have to offer.

If you'd like to see the dividend payers our team at Motley Fool Income Investor likes, including its six "buy first" stock ideas, you can try the service free for 30 days. Click here for all the details -- there's no obligation to subscribe.

Already a member of Income Investor? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was first published Aug. 25, 2008. It has been updated.

Ilan Moscovitz owns shares of Whole Foods, a Stock Advisor recommendation. Intel is an Inside Value pick. Motley Fool Options recommended buying calls on Intel. The Fool owns shares of XTO and has a disclosure policy.