Will Dividends Disappear in 2013?

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Dividends have become one of the most important attributes investors look for in a promising stock. But if we go over the fiscal cliff -- or even if a cliff solution doesn't reverse 2013's tax rules for all taxpayers -- then companies that have gotten onto the dividend bandwagon in recent years might find themselves heading for the exits.

What the cliff will do
Unless lawmakers can agree on a way to avert the fiscal cliff, on Jan. 1, tax rates will change dramatically. For ordinary taxes on wages, investment interest, and other forms of ordinary income, top rates will rise from 35% to 39.6%. Add on the 3.8% Medicare surtax that will go into effect next year, and the total rate that a top-bracket taxpayer will face will be 43.4%.

That may seem like a big hike, but it's nothing compared to what dividend investors will see. With current maximum rates on dividends of 15%, 2013 tax law would completely take away the preference for dividend income, sending taxes all the way up to the same 43.4% rate that applies to ordinary income. In other words, while wage income would see a modest tax increase, taxes on dividends would nearly triple.

That proposed jump has led to a huge number of special dividends and payout accelerations into 2012. But if those higher taxes do take effect, the more important question will be whether dividend-paying stocks do an about-face and reduce their payouts, seeking more tax-efficient ways to return capital.

The way it was
To get a sense of what's most likely, it makes sense to look back to past periods during which dividends were out of vogue. A 2002 study (link opens PDF file) published in The Journal of Finance found that from 1980 to 2000, the amount of money that companies spent on share repurchase programs rose from less than 5% to almost 42%, with average annual growth rates of 26% on buybacks far outpacing the less than 7% growth in dividends. By 1999, industrial companies spent more on share repurchases than on dividends -- the first time in history that had occurred.

So why did dividends go out of style? It certainly wasn't because investors stopped wanting income from their investments. Rather, it came down to a simple question of economics: With tax rates of dividends higher than tax rates on capital gains, it made more sense for investors to have their companies make share buybacks, selling shares to generate cash when needed. Any gains would result in less tax than the corresponding amount of dividend income.

Conversely, when tax cuts took effect in the early 2000s, the rates on dividends and capital gains became equal. That eliminated the advantage that buybacks had over dividends, and when shareholders clamored for more income in light of falling interest rates on fixed-income alternatives, companies were in a better position to deliver by raising their payouts.

What's to come
If a big disparity in tax rates between dividends and capital gains again emerges -- and under current law, it would, with maximum capital gains rates rising to only 20% -- then you can certainly expect some companies to move back toward buybacks. I'd argue the best candidates to do so are those with heavy insider ownership that have been leaders in driving special dividends. For instance, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) CEO Sheldon Adelson and various relatives and trusts own more than 50% of the company's stock, earning Adelson a $1.2 billion payday from its December special dividend. Sands has raised its dividend and says it's committed to increase it further, but high tax rates could well change Adelson's mind. Spirits-maker Brown-Forman (NYSE: BF-B  ) and retail giant Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) are other examples of companies with big insider ownership that have taken action to accelerate dividends into 2012.

But some newer dividend stocks might be less likely to reverse their recent shifts. For instance, tech giants Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) and Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO  ) just started their payouts very recently, and doing so opened the door to a whole new class of income investors. Neither will want to jeopardize losing those new shareholders, although they may decide not to accelerate payout increases.

Get ready
Even if tax rates put dividends at a disadvantage, dividends won't entirely disappear in 2013. What may happen, though, is that the trend away from buybacks toward dividends in recent years could reverse itself to save investors some money on their tax bill.

Apple investors are worried about a lot more than just its dividend. With its recent swoon, what you really need to know is whether Apple remains a buy. Get answers from Motley Fool senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief Eric Bleeker, whose in-depth research on Apple will give you reasons to buy and reasons to sell Apple, and what opportunities are left for the company (and more important, your portfolio) going forward. To get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple, simply click here now.

Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2012, at 10:18 AM, dwilh51183 wrote:

    Aapl is selling iPhones at an alarming rate that factories in china told workers to skip taking their breaks to keep up their production. Look for 80 million phones sold this quarter

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2012, at 10:19 AM, dwilh51183 wrote:


  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2012, at 1:42 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    Between the 43.4% maximum rate on dividends... and the 35% max tax rate on corporate earnings, what we're talking about here is the U.S. government confiscating over 75% of a company's earnings between the time it makes the money and the time any of it lands in the pocket of a dividend recipient.

    The "incentive" that Obama's anti-capitalism crusade is creating is:

    1. For companies to invest their earnings or buy back stock instead of distributing dividends.

    2. For companies to expand and hire employees overseas to avoid U.S. corporate taxes, which are now the highest in the industrialized world.

    NONE of these incentives bode well for U.S. growth or the hiring of U.S. workers... but then...

    ... when, over the past 80 years of global economics, have we EVER seen socialist policies like Mr. Obama champions further the economic prospects of ANY nation.


  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2012, at 9:38 AM, NickD wrote:

    How in the world can our government be so foolish?Anyone that claims that there is not a lot of stuff that can be cut out of the federal budget is lying to you.All of this crazy spending is going to get us into a massive amount of trouble eventually. Already, on a per capital basis the U.S. national debt is worse than the national debts of Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.

    We have accumulated the biggest debt in the history of the world and we are adding to it at a rate of about 150 million dollars an hour.

    Our politicians strut around as if they are the smartest and wisest leaders in the history of the world, but the truth is that someday people will look back in horror at the decline of our once great society.The federal government needs to stop spending so much money on stupid things and needs to stop pushing our national debt to nightmarish new levels.Unfortunately, the corruption in Washington D.C. is so deep and so pervasive that it is going to be almost impossible to turn it around.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2171444, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/27/2016 12:57:58 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,199.27 -0.06 0.00%
S&P 500 2,137.09 -2.34 -0.11%
NASD 5,229.98 -20.28 -0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/27/2016 12:42 PM
AAPL $115.04 Down -0.55 -0.48%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
BF-B $45.52 Up +0.05 +0.11%
Brown-Forman (B Sh… CAPS Rating: ****
CSCO $30.42 Down -0.13 -0.43%
Cisco Systems CAPS Rating: ****
LVS $56.84 Down -1.18 -2.03%
Las Vegas Sands CAPS Rating: ****
WMT $69.84 Up +0.25 +0.36%
Wal-Mart Stores CAPS Rating: ***