Why We Shouldn't Be Shocked by Stock Buybacks

Photo: Robert Sheie

I have a confession to make: I like stock buybacks.

In fact, if you go through every stock I've ever owned, at least 90% would show consistently decreasing share counts. Over time, repurchases often go unnoticed, and share counts dwindle. Earnings per share rise. It's a beautiful thing.

Some days, though, I feel like the only one. Last week, Jason Zweig of the Wall Street Journal opined on buybacks, stating that they should be looked at cautiously. Corporate suits have a track record of buying back more stock when share prices are high, after all.

Zweig's cautionary article is just one of many. Stock prices are trudging higher. A dollar reinvested at today's prices isn't buying as much earnings as it might have bought in...say, 2010.

But is that true? I don't think so. In fact, a dollar used to buy back stock may be better invested than a dollar paid out as a dividend.

The numbers that matter
This week, I watched as the financial industry pleaded for the acceptance of the Federal Reserve. Financial institutions with more than $50 billion in assets submitted dividend and buyback plans to the Fed for approval.

Most passed with flying colors, winning new payouts for investors.

In one notable example, American Express (NYSE: AXP  ) and Discover (NYSE: DFS  ) will spend $7.8 billion to repurchase shares over the next 4 quarters. At the same time, they'll distribute only $1.6 billion in combined dividends. 

Repurchases won. It's almost rare in the financial space -- FactSet reveals the financial sector had the third-worst buyback yield of the 10 stock market sectors.  

Source: FactSet Buyback Quarterly

But I'm not shocked, or even remotely surprised by new buyback activity. I think the resurgence of repurchases is systemic, and almost predictable. Paying out dividends is too expensive.

Thinking like an executive
When dividend tax rates were adjusted to include a bracket as high as 23.9%, it wasn't ordinary Americans that took the hit. It was the wealthiest of investors. These wealthy investors are the type we tend to see at the top of the corporate food chain.

Dividends have a cost. At a top rate of 23.9%, the wealthiest investors see only $0.761 of each dollar paid in the form of a dividend. Each dollar reinvested at the corporate level in repurchases, however, is equal to $1. Uncle Sam never gets his cut -- at least not now, it's deferred until shares are sold at a gain.

Naturally, that means buybacks are most preferable to the kind of people who make dividend or repurchase decisions in America's biggest companies.

Buying back stock at a 24% discount
The top dividend tax rates also means corporate executives don't need to be good market timers when repurchasing shares. A repurchase buys 31% more stock than a dividend and subsequent repurchase, considering the effect of taxation.

Said another way, a repurchase is like buying stock at 76 cents on the dollar when dividends would otherwise be reinvested. Warren Buffett has explained this rationale for why Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) doesn't pay a dividend.

These economics aren't in play for all shareholders. Certainly not for me. Higher taxes only affect those who earn substantially more than I do. But I think it would be a mistake to ignore the changing tax code, and higher dividend taxes, when questioning the efficacy of repurchases. Higher taxes have made repurchases less expensive for the people who call the shots. Naturally, they'll choose repurchases over dividends.

The point is higher dividend taxes won't affect everyone. But it will affect virtually every executive who has a say in setting dividend or repurchase policies. It's a buyback world, and it will be for a long time. 

Take advantage of this little-known government tax rule
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2014, at 7:18 PM, cfischer99 wrote:

    You raise some interesting points, but I have a quibble.

    "Higher taxes have made repurchases less expensive for the people who call the shots. Naturally, they'll choose repurchases over dividends."

    Even ignoring the composition of the corporate boards and the executive management, the wealthy are the people who tend to own more stock (in both shares and dollars).

    I'd be interested to see if the slant toward repurchases benefits more of the equity-holders on a per-share basis, albeit not necessarily on a per-investor basis.

    Do the large pension investors have any preference for which of the two options they prefer? How about the charitable trust investors?

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2014, at 4:18 AM, hstern wrote:

    Thanks for this! I never considered a debate of dividends v buy-backs, but this makes a lot of sense; why pay taxes on dividends, when instead you can just see the value of your stock rise?

    That said, I think dividends have their place, too. In order to realize the value of my stock, I have to sell it, thereby eliminating my longer term earning potential, whereas dividends are a continual stream.

    For younger investors like myself, I prefer buybacks. My mother, however, is most certainly a dividend gal, herself.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2895091, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/18/2014 5:33:17 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement