Income Investing by the Poolside

Summertime and the investing is easy, P&G and Unilever's dividends will rise if that debt don't get too high.

Jul 22, 2014 at 3:43PM

You know you have found a pretty simple investing process when the whole thing fits inside a single tweet. Eddy Elfenbein distilled a pretty interesting investment screen into less than 140 characters when he tweeted:


It's hard to get much simpler than that, but even in this ultra-simple process, Elfenbein manages to cover two of the most important and often overlooked areas of a good investment case. One, make sure you get paid by the company. After all, as a shareholder you are a part owner and insisting on a dividend in return for your cash is just common sense. Two, make sure the company does not operate with too much leverage. Debt works until it doesn't, and we saw in 2008 what happens when it doesn't. Be safe out there Fools.

I ran a "Poolside" screen to see how well Eddy Elfenbein's idea works in practice. I screened for companies with at least a 3% yield, and as for reasonable debt I used no more than a 0.7 debt/equity ratio. This filter turns up some interesting companies 


Dividend Yield

Debt/Equity Ratio

AstraZeneca (NYSE:AZN)



Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)



Unilever (NYSE:UL)



Source: Morningstar

For such a simple screen that is a pretty intriguing list of companies. All of these companies have simple to understand business models and sustainable customer demand.

Taking a look at some counterexamples, instead of owning shares in the above companies, an investor could buy shares of Twitter. Unfortunately for Twitter investors, the company does not pay a dividend, so its investors are 100% reliant on price appreciation to deliver investment returns. 

In the case of debt, with proper usage it can amplify returns, however if things turn against the company and the company cannot pay its obligations then debt becomes a boat anchor. Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) pays an incredibly high yield at 9.9%, but investors have to question the sustainability of this because of Seadrill's high debt/equity ratio of 1.2. If the tides turn against offshore drilling suddenly Seadrill's business and dividend will be at risk.

By insisting on a 3% dividend you limit your choices to companies that pay out over 50% more than the current S&P 500 dividend payout. Furthermore, this helps investors avoid speculative situations. Checking the debt level gives the investor a margin of safety, as the company's balance sheet should be ready to weather tough times.

But of course it's never quite as simple as just blindly running the screen and counting your dough. For one thing, as great as a 3% dividend is these days, a dividend that is too high should give you pause. Seadrill's dividend is a function of investors' confidence in its ability to execute and service its debt. As a safety measure, in addition to screening out companies with too much debt, before you head for the pool it makes sense to eliminate companies with dividends that are too high. The screen I ran showed 43 companies with a yield of 10% or higher.

The highest was from an OTC traded medical device manufacturer with a $7 million market cap that reported a 65% dividend. I have never heard of it (or most of the +10% payers) but I would be willing to bet that it will cut its dividend before you jump off the diving board. The filtering process is important both on the inbound side, or what to include, and the outbound side -- or what to exclude.

Adding some basic safety checks to make sure the dividend is at least 3% but perhaps no higher than the 6%-7% range makes sense. It's also worth including a check that the dividend is well covered, so look for a payout ratio below 70%. This screens out AstraZeneca (171.8%). 

That leaves two companies -- Procter & Gamble and Unilever. If they are equally weighted you wind up with a 3.15% yield from companies operating with low leverage, with products that billions of people use all over the globe every day. 

The revised process:

1. Screen for 3%-7% dividends

2. Delete companies with too much debt

3. Delete companies with payout ratios above 70%

4. Sit by the pool

Not sure if all of that can still fit into 140 characters, but it's not that complicated of a process. Now, can we go to the pool, already?

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That’s beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor’s portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Gunnar Peterson owns shares of AstraZeneca plc (ADR), Procter & Gamble, and Unilever. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble, Seadrill, Twitter, and Unilever. The Motley Fool owns shares of Seadrill. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.

Compare Brokers