MIVA Searches for Answers

Recs

12

There's a problem at MIVA (Nasdaq: MIVA). Its bread-and-butter contextual advertising business is having no problem generating more clicks, but its advertisers keep paying less and less for those leads.

Last night's quarterly report didn't put an end to that troublesome trend. Its U.S. media business is now generating $0.065 per ad click. That's well below what market leaders Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) are commanding, as well as what MIVA itself was once capable of.

The company is generating a little more revenue per lead in Europe, but the trend there also points to lower revenue per click.

The company still managed to grow its top line during the final quarter of 2006. Revenue inched 1% higher to $43.5 million, on the strength of its MIVA Direct business of private-branded desktop software applications. It posted a loss of $0.20 a share for the quarter.

MIVA is trying, and that includes the humbling announcement back in January that it would begin serving Google ads on some of its content pages. Smaller players have realized that it's often easier to turn to companies with wider ad networks to populate pages with targeted text ads. Companies like Answers (Nasdaq: ANSW) have teamed up with Google, and the results can be pretty inspiring. The parent company of Answers.com found revenues soar 242% higher last year.

This doesn't mean that smaller paid-search specialists like MIVA and Looksmart (Nasdaq: LOOK) should throw in the towel, letting Google make the most of their traffic forever. However, right now it seems to be the most logical way for MIVA to start growing its revenue per click again.

Companies like Google are growing way too fast for smaller players like MIVA to be denied a ride on the coattails. Let's see what they do before Google gets those coattails hemmed higher.

Yahoo! is an active recommendation in the Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter service. To see what else has been recommended by David and Tom Gardner, try the newsletter free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz still believes in the paid search sector. He does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 523903, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 9:05:42 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:00 PM
GOOG $583.00 Up +3.24 +0.56%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
LOOK $1.04 Down -0.01 -0.95%
LOOKSMART, LTD. CAPS Rating: No stars
MIVA $0.22 Down +0.00 +0.00%
MIVA, INC. CAPS Rating: No stars
YHOO $14.97 Down -0.03 -0.20%
Yahoo!, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Naked position: A naked position is when one has a non-hedged position. It can also refer to some option positions.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!