Cisco Demands On-Demand Software

Recs

12

WebEx Communications (Nasdaq: WEBX) CEO Subrah Iyar sounded awfully upbeat when I recently interviewed him. Now I know why.

Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) announced yesterday that it will shell out $3.2 billion in cash for Iyar's company. As Tim Beyers told us yesterday, the deal fits well into Cisco's long-range strategy. It's also an alert to investors that on-demand software is a real growth opportunity.

"Ten years ago, on-demand was a crazy idea," Iyar told me. "It took a lot of education from us and companies like Salesforce.com (NYSE: CRM) to convince customers of the benefits. We just thought it was better than buying hardware, installing software, and then having to periodically install upgrades on the hardware. Why not just log into a website?"

It's a simple idea, but far from easy to deliver. An on-demand system requires a sophisticated foundation that supports huge transaction volumes. Every month, 3.5 million people access WebEx to hold online meetings, make sales presentations, and share documents.

Another notable achievement of on-demand is its success in reaching the small-to-medium business (SMB) market. "Many technology companies have coveted the SMB market, but have not been able to find an effective way to sell, set up, and support them," said Dan Twing of Enterprise Management Associates in a recent Fool interview. "On-demand [software] makes it easy, and the big boys are interested in reaching the SMBs this way."

It also helps that on-demand companies charge monthly or quarterly subscription fees instead of large up-front payments, an enticing feature for customers of all sizes.

Happily, investors have plenty of strong on-demand companies to choose from. At the moment, my favorites include Concur Technologies (Nasdaq: CNQR), Taleo (Nasdaq: TLEO), and RightNow Technologies (Nasdaq: RNOW). But don't assume Cisco's deal guarantees that all on-demand plays are slam dunks. The approach is still in its early stages, and some companies will crater -- that's the nature of technology.

Cisco made it clear in yesterday's conference call that its smart technologists have a core philosophy for on-demand, including a strong technology foundation, success with the SMB segment, and optimal use of the subscription model. For investors in on-demand software, this coherent strategy is insightful and encouraging. It's also telling that Cisco was willing to pay a hefty seven times 2006 revenues to jump into the on-demand market.

Further Foolishness on demand:

Fool contributor Tom Taulli, author of The Complete M&A Handbook, does not own shares mentioned in this article. He is currently ranked 1,817 out of 24,388 in CAPS. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 523965, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 5:01:06 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
CRM $63.49 Up +2.48 +4.06%
salesforce.com, in… CAPS Rating: *
CNQR $38.31 Up +0.99 +2.65%
Concur Technologie… CAPS Rating: **
CSCO $23.99 Up +0.17 +0.71%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Variable cost: A variable cost is an expense that rises or falls in conjunction with a company's level of productivity.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!