Bank of Granite Stonewalled

Recs

8

It must feel like death by a thousand cuts at Bank of Granite (Nasdaq: GRAN). Although the bank is undoubtedly well-run, the company's results continue to lag because of a tough banking environment, as well as exposure to lackluster local economies.

In the first quarter of 2007, Bank of Granite earned $4 million, down 9% from $4.4 million a year ago. The slight drop-off was due to an increase in loan loss provisions of roughly $700,000, although overall credit quality indicators remain healthy. Most indicators were down. For the year, return on average assets dropped to 1.36% from 1.62%, return on equity dropped to 10.99% from 12.84%, and the efficiency ratio increased to 49.54% from 49.07%. Keep in mind: All of those numbers are pretty decent -- an ROA of more than 1.25%, an ROE of more than 10%, and an efficiency ratio of less than 50% are not bad at all. However, they're not the same stellar numbers the company is used to posting.

I don't fault anyone at Bank of Granite for the tepid results. As everyone knows, being a spread lender in a flat/inverted yield curve environment isn't all it's cracked up to be. Mercantile Bank (Nasdaq: MBWM), Bank of the Ozarks (Nasdaq: OZRK), and GB&T (Nasdaq: GBTB) -- I could go on -- are just some of the other mid-cap banks that have experienced similar struggles.

I do, however, salute management for its willingness to accept accountability. Chairman Charles Snipes remarked: "While many banks our size would have been pleased to report this level of quarterly earnings, we are disappointed in these results." This should be pleasing to shareholders. When management publicly gives itself a bad grade, you know it's working on the solution.

Related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Emil Lee is an analyst and a disciple of value investing. He doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned above. Emil appreciates your comments, concerns, and complaints. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 525631, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 10:03:32 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 3:59 PM
GRAN $0.44 Up +0.03 +6.72%
Bank of Granite Co… CAPS Rating: No stars
MBWM $3.39 Up +0.12 +3.67%
Mercantile Bank Co… CAPS Rating: No stars
OZRK $26.54 Up +0.11 +0.42%
Bank of the Ozarks… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Soft dollars: Soft dollars refers to a way in which money managers pay brokerage houses for their research. Using soft dollars means that in return for research, the money manager "pays" the brokerage house by using it to buy and sell stocks, thus racking up (and paying) commission fees that might be inflated to make sure the cost of the research is matched.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!