Quick Take: Taking Bullets for Jobs

Government and big business are alike in many ways. For instance, they both like to have a patsy available for light cleaning and bullet-taking. Look no further than the expected SEC lawsuit against former executives at Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) . It will reportedly name Nancy R. Heinen, Apple's former general counsel, and CFO Fred D. Anderson, on whom Apple's board pinned the blame awhile back.

This is disingenuous and shameful at the least, because the trail of slime leads all the way up to CEO Steve Jobs.

Despite the fact that Jobs participated in options backdating (he was "aware that favorable grant dates had been selected ..."), the compliant Apple board -- with a lapdog of Al Gore's stature -- declared that Jobs wasn't at fault. Oh sure, he'd blessed the backdating, but didn't know the accounting implications, they said. (A third-grader can understand the math, but Jobs can't?) They also claimed that Jobs didn't personally benefit, but a sharp analysis by Graef Crystal at Bloomberg blows that whopper out of the water.

It's too bad the SEC didn't go after the bigger fish. But this is America, after all, and Jobs does hire people who make pretty shiny things. Why blame him if he and his cronies took more from shareholders than they deserved? Isn't taking advantage of shareholders what the capital markets are for?

Update: The SEC's press release on the lawsuit is here, and it ain't pretty. The full complaint is here (opens a .pdf file).

Update 2: Ex-CFO Fred Anderson apparently isn't taking all the bullets from Jobs without a last-gasp revelation. A statement sent to The Wall Street Journal claims, among other things, that Jobs had been specifically informed of the accounting implications.

Comments? Bring them here.

At the time of publication, Seth Jayson had no positions in any company mentioned here. See his latest blog commentary here. View his stock holdings and Fool profile here. Fool rules are here.

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 526337, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/28/2016 12:19:34 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,230.36 60.68 0.33%
S&P 500 2,138.68 5.64 0.26%
NASD 5,216.78 0.80 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/28/2016 11:58 AM
AAPL $115.02 Up +0.54 +0.47%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****