Dramatic Losses at Overstock

Recs

16

"Our business is dramatically improving."

Bold words from a man who runs an online retailer that burned $58 million in cash on revenues of $158 million. But then we're used to bold words from Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK).

Part of Overstock's "dramatic improvement" was an 11% year-over-year drop in revenues. Probably not the improvement that believers of the Overstock growth story were looking forward to, but there is a bright side to the figures.

The increase in gross margins and profits -- 270 basis points and 7%, respectively -- bodes well for a company that aspires to stop burning cash quite so quickly. Net cash burned by operations came to $58 million, which, to be fair, is an improvement on the $73 million torched in the prior-year period. But how dramatic is it? And can it continue?

As I've pointed out many times, Overstock is waging a losing battle against the likes of Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) and anyone else who's got the time to sell online. I also think Amazon is a horrible business for investors. (Great for consumers, though.) Its blowout earnings today are weak where they count: Cash flow is flat. So, if Amazon can't get 'er done despite a 32% increase in revenues, why would anyone assume Overstock could with a top line that's moving in reverse?

In the end, this is a mostly moatless business, which means the competition must come on price, or brand recognition, or service. Overstock's drop in revenues looks like a pretty good indication that it's not able to compete on that playing field. Where's Overstock's advantage? That's the question investors need to ask, and then soon after, they need to ask, "How much do I pay for a money-burning business with no moat?"

For more on online commerce, check out:

Amazon.com is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. A free 30-day trial is but a click away.

At the time of publication, Seth Jayson had no positions in any company mentioned here. See his latest blog commentary here. View his stock holdings and Fool profile here. Fool rules are here.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 526451, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 4:03:57 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
AMZN $129.66 Up +0.67 +0.52%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
OSTK $15.73 Up +0.19 +1.22%
Overstock.com, Inc… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Poop and scoop: Poop and scoop is a form of illegal stock manipulation, where a scammer tries to drive down the price of stock through publishing and distributing unsolicited misleading advertising materials so that the scammer can buy the stock at a lower price.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!