This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

57

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
No sooner had Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation CDW (Nasdaq: CDWC) reported its blockbuster sales news this morning -- average daily sales up 22.8% in April, for a total of $621 million, or nearly 29% better than last year -- than pessimist-in-name-only Bear Stearns rushed out an upgrade on the stock. Even though these numbers were boosted by CDW's October acquisition of erstwhile privately held Berbee Information Networks, and even though average daily sales would have been up less without Berbee, Bear Stearns remained impressed.

That's as it should be. We were impressed, too, and so was Mr. Market, which has already bid up CDW's stock 7% on the news. There's no question that CDW's news was good. The question is whether the news was so good that after the run-up, and after the upgrade, the stock is still as good a buy as it was before the news happened, and before Bear belatedly recognized the company's inherent goodness. Simply put, should you trust Bear's opinion that the stock is now a buy?

Well, should you?
The answer to that question depends on your estimation of Bear's stock-picking prowess -- and that's where CAPS can help, by giving you a glimpse of the banker's record.

Unfortunately, that record is no longer anywhere near as good as it was when we first baited the Bear in February. Back then, Bear boasted a CAPS rep in the top 10% of Wall Street stock-pickers and a superb CAPS rating of 99.48. But this Bear's been hibernating ever since, and its CAPS rating has wasted away to a meager 80.48. No longer a "Wall Street's Best" player, Bear today struggles just to maintain the rank of "CAPS All-Star," a title held by more than 5,000 players -- precious few of whom are card-carrying Wall Street bankers.

Turning our attention to a few of the traps Bear set off since February, we find:

Company

Bear Says:

CAPS Says:
(Out of 5 Stars)

Bear's Pick
Lagging S&P By:

Valero (NYSE: VLO)

Underperform

*****

11 points

Winthrop Realty Trust (NYSE: FUR)

Outperform

****

9 points

Cardinal Health (NYSE: CAH)

Outperform

****

8 points

Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG)

Outperform

****

7 points

Of course, it hasn't all been bad news for Bear:

Company

Bear Says:

CAPS Says:

Bear's Pick Beating S&P By:

T-3 Energy  (Nasdaq: TTES)

Outperform

****

13 points

OfficeMax  (NYSE: OMX)

Underperform

*

14 points

I have to admit -- while I'm no card-carrying PETA member, I do feel sorry for Bear. These guys started off with such promise on CAPS, and they've fallen on such hard times that I truly feel their pain. (Literally. Over the past month, my own CAPS score has plunged more than 200 points, losing me nearly 500 places in the rankings!)

Ever the optimist, I hope that Bear can emerge from its funk and become once again the CAPS superstar it was at the beginning. In that regard, I think its endorsement of CDW might mark a step in the right direction.

After all, Tom Gardner's two CDW recommendations have members of Motley Fool Stock Advisor beating the S&P 500 by more than 10 percentage points apiece. Seems to me that Bear could do a lot worse than hitching its wagon to Tom's ever-rising star. (Same goes for you. Claim your free trial subscription now, and see the entire portfolio for no extra charge.)

What else can you get for free? How about a third opinion of CDW? Visit the company's CAPS page, and find out what the No. 1-scoring CAPS player on this stock thinks about its prospects.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 505 out of more than 28,000 rated players. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 527661, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 9:03:33 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:00 PM
PG $62.35 Down -0.13 -0.21%
The Procter & Gamb… CAPS Rating: *****
FUR $9.05 Up +0.30 +3.43%
Winthrop Realty Tr… CAPS Rating: ****
CAH $32.23 Up +0.20 +0.62%
Cardinal Health, I… CAPS Rating: ****
OMX $10.58 Down -0.42 -3.82%
OfficeMax, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
VLO $15.89 Down -0.11 -0.69%
Valero Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Naked position: A naked position is when one has a non-hedged position. It can also refer to some option positions.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!