Quick Take: Blackstone Is Ready, But Jesse Isn't Happy

According to The Wall Street Journal's online Deal Journal, civil rights activist Jesse Jackson is raising a little hell over theBlackstone (NYSE: BX  ) IPO set to hit the counter on Thursday. While many have raised an eyebrow over issues like the firm's taxes and the lavish compensation, Jackson has highlighted the underwriting lineup.

Jackson's contention is that a few minority-owned banks taking part in the deal were not given a high enough billing -- in fact, they aren't even listed on the cover of the prospectus. The Journal cited three specific firms, Blaylock & Co., Loop Capital, and Williams Capital, as minority-owned firms that Jackson felt were slighted because of race.

I'm not planning to tackle politics here, but from what I've seen, when it comes to colors, Wall Street sees three: red, black, and green. Jackson is also not one to typically see the glass as half-full, so it seems to me a bit of a coup that those three firms will now be able to pitch to new clients that they worked on the Blackstone IPO. After all, the firms headlining the deal are the biggest and the best in the industry, including Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) , Citibank (NYSE: C  ) , Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) , Lazard (NYSE: LAZ  ) , UBS (NYSE: UBS  ) , and ABN Amro (NYSE: ABN  ) .

Looking specifically at Blaylock: According to its website, the company was founded in 1993 and employs 50 professionals. By comparison, the firms on the cover of the prospectus are multibillion-dollar public companies that employ tens of thousands, and many of them date back to the early 1900s, if not earlier. Far from being a racial issue, this is a simple question of what size firms will end up on the cover of a $4.8 billion IPO -- I also don't see smaller firms such as Friedman Billings Ramsey or Keefe, Bruyette & Woods on the cover.

The investment banking business has a lot to do with salesmanship, track record, and relationships. The Blackstone deal, cover or not, should give these three firms a leg up in the future in all three areas, and will help them continue to grow and get involved with similar high-profile transactions.

Come on, Jesse -- cheer up!

More quick-takin' Fools:

Thoughts, reactions, arguments? Bring them here.

Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned. You can visit Matt on the Fool's CAPS service here, or check out his blog here. The Fool's disclosure policy would happily retire if it made what Steve Schwarzman makes for just one year.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 529866, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/22/2014 11:41:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement