Business as Usual for Barr

Recs

4

Law firms must love generic drugmakers, considering all the business they throw at them. Lately, Barr Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: BRL) has been a particularly big help to the profession.

Last week, privately held German firm Boehringer Ingelheim sued Barr over its generic version of Boehringer's Aggrenox, which is used to reduce the risk of strokes in patients. Boehringer claims that its patent is still in effect, and it's trying to stop Barr from proceeding with commercialization.

Barr filed an abbreviated New Drug Application (aNDA) in January, which the FDA accepted for review in May. The company believes that it's the first to file an aNDA for Aggrenox, which would give it an exclusivity period of six months if it's approved -- and the patent is disputed.

On Monday, Barr announced that it was being sued again, this time by Sepracor (Nasdaq: SEPR), for infringing on Sepracor's patent on its asthma drug Xopenex. In March, Barr filed an aNDA for marketing approval, and it was accepted last May.

Infringing on patents and getting sued for it is just part of the generics business. There's actually not much other choice for generic drugmakers: Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, that process is how the patent dispute is initiated. Barr is certainly getting good at this; earlier this year, it initiated its attempt to break Sanofi-Aventis' (NYSE: SNY) patent on Ambien CR.

Aggrenox had sales of about $258 million in the United States in the past year, and Xopenex's sales topped $600 million. Barr had $839 million in generic sales last year, so the additional sales from generic versions of Aggrenox or Xopenex could increase the bottom line substantially.

Investors appear to be getting used to Barr's method of operation; the news of the lawsuits didn't hurt the stock price. In these cases, I think it's right for investors to not factor in the future sales when the company files the aNDA, but to wait until the court has its say. As long as the lawyers don't cost more than what the company can gain during its exclusivity period, being the first to file the aNDA -- and having to deal with the lawsuits that are sure to follow -- is a good move for Barr.

Barr Pharmaceuticals is a recommendation of Motley Fool Stock Advisor. Would you like to know the other potentially lucrative picks from David and Tom Gardner? Start a 30-day risk-free trial. It's free.

Fool contributor Brian Orelli, Ph.D., doesn't own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Fool's disclosure policy doesn't infringe on any patents.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 531922, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/7/2009 11:08:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

12/22/2008 4:02 PM
BRL $65.80 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Barr Pharmaceutica… CAPS Rating: ****
SNY $36.70 Down -0.35 -0.94%
Sanofi-Aventis (AD… CAPS Rating: *****
SEPR $22.98 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Sepracor, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Channel stuffing: Channel stuffing is an accounting tactic supposedly used by manufacturers of products to artificially inflate the number of their products sold.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!