Deja Vu at Whole Foods

Recs

15

The Federal Trade Commission's got a mind to block Whole Foods Market's (Nasdaq: WFMI) acquisition of Wild Oats. ... Hey, wait a minute!

That's right, we're back to this again. Even though the FTC lost its bid to block Whole Foods' acquisition this past summer, and the deal is already completed, the agency is staging a renewed effort. Last summer, I contemplated (tongue firmly in cheek) the "evil empire" that Whole Foods might be building. And given the FTC's seemingly major disconnect from the competitive climate for grocers, I extended the science-fiction metaphor to suggest that the commission must be from another planet.

Well, speaking of science fiction, the FTC's second attack seems like some endless loop of space and time, where past events keep repeating themselves. I mean, there's a whole spectrum of competitive influences that Whole Foods faces for organic goods. Trader Joe's, Safeway (NYSE: SWY), Kroger (NYSE: KR), and even Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) are all hungry for a piece of the organic action and truly appear to be competing quite competently.  

I feel a little bit weird, like I'm on an episode of Lost or something. I feel a little bit weird, like I'm on an episode of Lost or something.  

Anyway, this past summer, I got loads of emails from Foolish readers on this topic. A few thought that Whole Foods' move was anticompetitive, and some others simply appreciated the FTC's action because it has let so many other deals that seemed more clearly anticompetitive go through, but the lion's share of the responses I got were appalled by the lack of common-sense logic in the FTC's stance. When most consumers don't seem to feel particularly threatened by a takeover, you've got to wonder what the deal's critics are up to.

A federal judge shot the FTC down in pretty strong terms and refused its later effort to block the deal pending an appeal, and now Whole Foods has already moved on with its plans. Could it be that the FTC is going to suffer its own case of deja vu?

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 539171, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 6:50:23 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:04 PM
KR $23.27 Down -0.05 -0.21%
The Kroger Co. CAPS Rating: ****
SWY $22.84 Up +0.16 +0.71%
Safeway, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
WMT $51.25 Down -0.03 -0.06%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ***
WFMI $28.25 Up +1.15 +4.24%
Whole Foods Market… CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Buying in thirds: Buying in thirds is a time-honored Motley Fool practice, teaching investors to enter an eventual "full" stockholding in three separate lots. This is typically advisable for those who are new to investing, those who like a stock long-term but worry about its present valuation being high, and those who like to dollar-cost average.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!