Starbucks' Schultz Forgoes the Dream

It's well known that Starbucks' (Nasdaq: SBUX  ) Howard Schultz has plenty of work to do, now that he's returned to the company's helm. So it's probably wise that he won't seek re-election to DreamWorks Animation's (NYSE: DWA  ) board of directors.

Schultz has been on DreamWorks' board since 2004; his tenure will end at the coming annual meeting. He's certainly not alone among luminaries serving on that company's board. As of DreamWorks' latest proxy statement, other high-profile board members include Paul Allen (co-founder of Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) ), David Geffen, and Meg Whitman of eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) .

According to DreamWorks' 8-K filing, time requirements related to Schultz's return to the Starbucks CEO position led him to decide not to stand for re-election.

Last week, I wrote a piece on corporate governance issues, and about how board composition is an important (if complex and sticky) consideration, since boards are supposed to represent shareholders' interests. (Given the sort of high-profile corporate debacles that have befallen the financial-services industry, it's easy to wonder how boards seem to so often miss signs of trouble on the horizon.)

For investors looking for red flags, directors who serve as active CEOs at other companies might be a problem, as common as that practice is. After all, someone who's already busy heading up an entire company may be distracted or impeded in fulfilling a director's role at another corporation, even if that effortusually only adds up to a couple of weeks a year. Who needs extra roadblocks to having a robust, fully engaged board?

Schultz's decision to leave DreamWorks' board could be viewed as nothing more than an interesting tidbit of news, but I think it represents consideration for shareholders' best interests. Starbucks shareholders know that Schultz has plenty of work to do at the coffee company. And I'm sure DreamWorks shareholders would prefer directors who are grappling with less pressing matters than a major turnaround. Schultz's move sounds like good, common-sense business to me. 

Related Foolishness:


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 589921, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/20/2014 6:25:45 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement