2 Banks Doubling Down

Recs

4

The dilutive deluge continues. An unprecedented need to raise capital to shore up their balance sheets has been one of the most overlooked side effects that financial companies have had to deal with in the midst of the housing mess.

Citigroup (NYSE: C) has already coughed up more than $40 billion. Thornburg Mortgage (NYSE: TMA) and E*Trade (Nasdaq: ETFC) have practically given away the house. Since last summer, big banks have had to raise a mind-boggling $213 billion to even out the credit crunch.

Here are two more taking the equity plunge:

Binge No. 1
Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) is considering raising additional capital, estimated to be between $3 billion and $4 billion. The exact terms will likely be announced when Lehman reports quarterly earnings later this month.

Trying to defend itself from short-sellers picking apart its books, Lehman raised $4 billion a couple of months ago. Just last week, it took heat from hedge fund manager David Einhorn, who's short Lehman stock, after he poked holes in certain assets Lehman had marked up. With shares down more than 50% year to date and a market cap under $18 billion, shareholders might have a bone to pick over the capital-raising binges, but in today's survival-of-the-fittest environment, options are running slim.

Binge No. 2
While it's held up far better than most of its peers, State Street (NYSE: STT) announced yesterday that it is raising $2.5 billion by selling common stock. The stock sale comes with a hefty price tag, expected to dilute existing investors around 9%.

Back in January, State Street warned that it would have to put aside more than $600 million to cover legal costs stemming from frustrated customers who may have felt duped into subprime investments that just weren't their thing. The plot thickened last month. Although State Street stood by its January estimate, Bloomberg reported that the final damages could be as much as $7.8 billion. Yowza!

Related Foolishness:

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. He appreciates your questions, comments, and complaints. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 03, 2008, at 3:17 PM, prescient11 wrote:

    Hey idiot, what is the "giving away the house" dilution you refer to with ETFC. Why don't you stop trying to compare them to TMA. Thanks

  • Report this Comment On June 03, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Catlayst wrote:

    Yes, precient11, there was dilution.

  • Report this Comment On June 03, 2008, at 10:35 PM, kknd69 wrote:

    Dilution was not nearly to the same level, You guys talk out of both sides of your mouth! Thats why I didn't re-new my acct. Get the news right or don't report at all.

  • Report this Comment On June 09, 2008, at 10:06 PM, prescient11 wrote:

    You stated:

    "Back in November, ETrade sold Citadel 18% of itself for about $2.55 billion. That caused a 40% dilution to earnings per share and basically wiped out all tangible equity. That's what I'm referring to when i mention dilution."

    You are right about 18% shares. You are wrong about the 40% dilution and wiping out tangible equity. According to Etrade it was 50 cents per share of dilution.

    Regardless, it was not on the same planet, let alone the same ballpark, of what TMA did.

    What is Etrade's cash on hand? You should do more due diligence before making such statements.

  • Report this Comment On June 09, 2008, at 11:45 PM, prescient11 wrote:

    Morgan, thank you for your diligence in responding to my points and I apologize for the idiot comment. However, as an ETFC long we've had to put up with garbage for so long you get kinda defensive.

    That must be Michael Hecht of BAC. That guy has absolutely no clue what's going on with ETFC. Talk about clueless. Morningstar's coverage is about the only one that is worse. I'm surprised Motley Fool hasn't done a few pieces on Etrade and what an amazing turnaround is happening.

    For example, their home equity portfolio performance is actually IMPROVING. No other's is. They will make a profit by 3Q, imho. In any event, BAC is wrong about dilution and tangible equity. Back of the envelope calculation puts ETFC's cash on hand at about $8/share. I suggest you check it out, but never rely on BAC, Citi, Morningstar, etc. They have no clue. LEH Is pretty good, so is David Trone and Repetto. At least they have some clue.

    Best regards.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 657247, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 4:27:04 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Why Investors Should Be Excited for a Bank Breakup

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 4:00 PM
C $4.28 Up +0.08 +1.90%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
LEH $0.13 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Lehman Brothers Ho… CAPS Rating: *
STT $41.74 Up +0.94 +2.30%
State Street Corp CAPS Rating: **
TMA $0.24 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Thornburg Mortgage… CAPS Rating: *
ETFC $1.64 Down +0.00 +0.00%
E*Trade Financial… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Corporate bond fund: A corporate bond fund is a mutual fund that invests in corporate bonds. If a bond fund is not otherwise designated, it is presumed to be a corporate bond fund.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!