FedEx Flops ... and UPS Follows

Let's start with a couple of random thoughts today.

RT No. 1: According to its website, UPS is billing itself as: "Ground reliability in the fast lane." 

RT No. 2: After reviewing archrival FedEx's (NYSE: FDX  ) earnings news last week,  particularly CEO Fred Smith's assertion that "Record high fuel prices and the weak U.S. economy" were responsible for hurting package volume in the U.S., I suggested that we wait and "see if UPS (NYSE: UPS  ) seconds that emotion next month."

Gee, that was fast. We didn't need to wait 30 days. Five days sufficed for UPS to echo FedEx's lament.

Plagiarism!
UPS slashed its own earnings expectations for the soon-to-be-reported second quarter by 15% yesterday. In doing so, the company practically stole the words out of Fred Smith's mouth: "Slow U.S. economic growth and an unprecedented increase in the cost of fuel have resulted in lower-than-expected U.S. package volume ... "

Actually, UPS went FedEx one better (or worse). Like UPS, FedEx saw volume for domestic shipments decline year over year last quarter. Yet FedEx still managed to report 1% volume growth, thanks to strength in its international segment, which was up 6%.  

UPS, however, isn't so lucky. According to management: "The anemic U.S. economy is negatively impacting package volume into the United States, affecting results for the International segment" (emphasis added). UPS didn't come right out and say it, but it's possible that Big Brown won't see its global volume-growth number saved by "international," as happened at FedEx last week.

Mind you, this does not necessarily mean that revenues will suffer. Like people movers Delta (NYSE: DAL  ) and AMR Corp (NYSE: AMR  ) , and pizza movers Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM  ) and Domino's (NYSE: DPZ  ) , package movers FedEx and UPS have been adding fuel surcharges to their deliveries to help offset rising fuel costs. But while such surcharges reduce margin erosion, raising the cost of delivery dampens demand for the companies' services.

Foolish takeaway
The big question here, of course, is what UPS's Q2 warning bodes for the rest of the year. If business is already 15% worse than UPS was thinking just a couple of months ago, this at least suggests we could see the year's earnings prediction slashed by a similar amount. In which case, UPS could earn maybe $3.44 this year, which equals, essentially, zero profit growth since 2005.

Check out recent earnings news in:

Get our analysts' unvarnished views of FedEx at Motley Fool Stock Advisor (where we've recommended it) and of UPS at Motley Fool Income Investor (where we've recommended it).

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. The Motley Fool has a picture-postcard disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 24, 2008, at 2:58 PM, chitran wrote:

    I would like to thanks to our president for the stimulus checks, if he wasn't my president I maybe not even think about this check......

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 670999, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 12:34:37 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement