McCain: Panderer, or Green-Thinking Genius?

John McCain isn't dumb; he knows how to work a crowd. All politicians do.

But is the Arizona senator's plan to pay for auto innovation, announced yesterday in a speech at Fresno State University, pandering? Or is it a genuine opportunity for investors? A little of both, I think.

Remember that drum-wielding bunny on TV?
McCain doesn't offer many details. According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, he's seeking a device that would "leapfrog" today's technology for 30% of the cost of existing hybrid and electric engines.

McCain also would give taxpayers a $5,000 tax credit for every zero-emissions vehicle they buy, according to the Journal. That could boost sales for Ford (NYSE: F  ) , General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) , and other automakers -- if they can successfully mass-produce zero-emission cars.

It'd be easy to accuse McCain of pandering here. Some surely will. I won't; I'm too intrigued by how the idea mirrors what we're seeing from NASA and its Centennial Challenges.

Seven of them are active now, including a $2 million race to create a lunar lander that's being managed by X Prize Foundation. Sound familiar? It should. Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites won a cool $10 million when SpaceShipOne reached sub-orbital altitude twice within a week. SpaceDev's rubber-burning rocket engine was key to the victory.

SpaceDev is a small California outfit that failed to deliver the returns I had hoped for when I invested. I've since sold -- better opportunities for my money exist elsewhere right now -- yet I still believe that small entrants are best positioned to disrupt the space industry. Virgin's Sir Richard Branson and Amazon's Jeff Bezos agree; each is investing to make the heavens more accessible.

The payoff is still years away. But with a moon landing expected before 2020, there's plenty of innovation -- and, thereby, investing opportunities -- still to be had.

Is your portfolio ready for the challenge?
Fuel economy is a more pressing issue than space travel. Oil prices soared above $140 a barrel recently. ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) is setting profit records every quarter. Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) is making a killing selling hybrids.

McCain, therefore, has a point: Improved fuel economy is a crucial step toward reducing U.S. dependence on oil, and his plan could spur innovation. At the very least, it would bolster the investing case for Energy Conversion Devices (Nasdaq: ENER  ) , an unloved growth stock with a thriving hybrid-engine business.

FuelCell Energy (Nasdaq: FCEL  ) could also profit. Last year, the company devised a method for transforming paint into energy for Ford. Yeah, I know; a paint-to-energy converter isn't the same as an auto engine. Nevertheless, FuelCell, fundamentally, is in the business of producing ... fuel cells. The know-how to meet McCain's challenge could be buried within its walls.

But those are just two ideas. Should McCain win the White House and enact legislation, the effects could be staggering. Which companies would win? Which would lose? Use the comments box below to make your picks and pans. Or to tell me why McCain's idea is more pandering than genius.

Fool on!

Amazon is a Stock Advisor selection. Try this market-beating service risk-free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers also writes for Rule Breakers. He encourages you to check out the Fool's Earth Day coverage from April for more clean-energy investing ideas.

Tim didn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article at the time of publication. You can see his portfolio and his latest blog commentary. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2008, at 10:19 AM, nonvolatile wrote:

    Mr. Beyers,

    Energy Conversion Devices (Nasdaq: ENER), is unloved? Hardly. It is up more than 100% since announcing its Q3 results on May 8.

    Also, it is primarily a manufacturer of thin film photovoltaic products via its wholly owned Uni-Solar subsidiary.

    They don't have a hybrid-engine business - much less a thriving one. They do have 50% ownership of Cobasys a NiMH battery maker. ChevronTexaco owns the other 50%. However, they are in the process of selling that business. GM has been identified as the likely buyer.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 671188, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 11:44:37 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement