This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Multinational megabank Citigroup downgraded Level 3 (Nasdaq: LVLT) to level zero this morning, when it tagged the telecom-services provider with the rarely heard (on Wall Street) rating of "sell."

But it's not as if Citi had been bullish on Level 3: The stock carried only a neutral rating before this morning's downgrade. As for why the downgrade happened, Citi now thinks that the telecom-services sector is going to post, at most, 3% revenue growth this year -- down from previous estimates of 4%. That drop will compress valuations across the industry, make Level 3's "wholesale revenue growth ... unsustainable," and consequently increase "downside risk for [Level 3's] share price." But is Citi right?

Let's go to the tape
For clues to this banker's prognosticating proficiency, we turn once again to its record on CAPS, where we find that Citi does get the majority of its calls right -- 54% since we started tracking. In fact, the analyst ranks in the top decile of CAPS investors overall, helped by telecom picks such as:

Company

Citi Said:

CAPS Says (5 Max):

Citi's Pick Beating S&P by:

Vonage (NYSE: VG)

Underperform

*

38 points

Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO)

Outperform

**

4 points

Equinix (Nasdaq: EQIX)

Outperform

*

20 points

Yet Citi's prescience in the field isn't without static. The company's placed some really bad calls here as well:

Company

Citi Said:

CAPS Says (5 Max):

Citi's Pick Lagging S&P by:

Nortel (NYSE: NT)

Outperform

**

59 points

Motorola (NYSE: MOT)

Outperform

**

35 points

Time Warner Telecom (Nasdaq: TWTC)

Outperform

**

14 points

Perhaps the most interesting thing about Citi's downgrade of Level 3, however, was contained in the dicta appended to its opinion. Specifically, the banker suggested that although it wasn't so keen on Level 3, Citi did like Level 3 rivals Equinix and Time Warner Telecom. Yet as you can see above, Citi's results on these two stocks, as well, have been mixed.

So what's a poor Fool to make of all of this high-minded telecom ratings-assignery? I'm not a huge fan of any of the three stocks Citi discussed this morning. Not Equinix. Not TW Telecom. Definitely not Level 3. Here's why:

  • Both of Citi's favorite picks, TW Telecom and Equinix, are expected to earn a profit next year. However, the high forward price-to-earnings ratios that result fail to measure up to their respective growth rates. This leaves TW Telecom with a 2.6 PEG ratio for 2009 and Equinix with a nearly as bad 1.9 ratio.
  • And that's all assuming next year turns out as well as planned -- an assumption that Citi's comments now put in question. Meanwhile, neither TW Telecom nor Level 3 is currently profitable. Equinix is profitable, but only marginally so.

Foolish takeaway
I think Equinix may be the best of the three stocks. But do you really want to sink your hard-earned cash into a stock whose greatest claim to fame is that it's the best of the worst?

I didn't think so.

Get the best of the Fool delivered to your inbox every Friday

Fool contributor Rich Smith owns no shares of any company named above. You can find Rich on CAPS, pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's ranked No. 4,260 out of more than 110,000 players. The Fool's disclosure policy is calling.

Comment (1)
Recommended (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On June 30, 2008, at 5:12 PM, ronbeasley wrote: Report this Comment

    Mason Hawkins, an accomplished, highly successful long-term value investor, owns nearly 29% of Level 3 through funds and managed accounts. Billionnaire Prem Watsa bought over 7% of the company last quarter. Some guy who sits behind a desk downgrades it. Who would you rather invest with?

    I think this is an extraordinary opportunity to buy Level 3. It is a substantial holding in my personal and client portfolios.

    Ron Beasley

    Investment Advisor

    www.rwbi.net

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 675667, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 8/30/2008 12:41:28 PM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Related Tickers

Level 3 Communications, Inc.

LVLT Down! $3.43 -0.06 (-1.72%) 4:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
1752 Outperforms
103 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,282.83 -1.37%
DJIA11,543.55 -1.47%
RSL 2K739.50 -1.11%
NASD2,367.52 -1.83%
Updated: 5:10:01 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Where will the U.S. dollar go from here?

Sponsored by: