What's Really Driving Oil Prices?

Recs

5

I suppose we might call it a smokescreen: Blame the steady upward march of crude prices on speculation by financial types, and thereby duck any need to take supply- or demand-related steps to slow -- or even reverse -- the surge.

This week, a trio of groups attempted to squelch the notion that the speculators -- definitely a pejorative term in this context -- and not basic supply and demand are pushing prices northward. One group, consisting of a passel of international oil companies, took direct aim at claims by OPEC and others that speculation is at the heart of the crude price jump to more than $140 a barrel, about double the level of a year ago.

For instance, BP (NYSE: BP) CEO Tony Hayward said it was a myth that financial types were behind the run-up in crude prices. And Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A) CEO Jeroen van der Veer said he believes that speculation merely follows the long-term fundamentals. And Repsol's (NYSE: REP) Antonio Brufau offered that the "fundamentals in the industry are the significant reasons for having these prices."

And then there was Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), whose analysts said that notions of a speculative bubble driving crude prices are "unwarranted." Rather, as the CEOs indicated, the real culprits may be politics and geopolitics. Hayward observed that the problems are above ground, not below it. And Brufau noted that 90% of global reserves are located in countries where investment by international oil companies is restricted or prohibited.

Finally, the Paris-based International Energy Agency said that, while blaming speculation is easy, the real reasons for the jump in prices include surging demand growth, supply shortages, and inadequate refining capacity. In detailing its assessment, the agency pointed to price surges in commodities that, because they're not traded on futures markets, are immune to speculation.

This argument should be more than academic for Foolish investors: If you believe that speculation is pushing prices higher, steer clear of energy names because you're witnessing a bubble that must burst eventually. But if, as I do, you think we're simply paying the piper for having long neglected obvious supply/demand considerations, then be sure to include energy representation in your portfolio. My favorite places to start are integrated ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), oilfield services leader Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB), and surging natural gas producer Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK).

Related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Chesapeake Energy is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Try the value-focused service free for 30 days.

Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this piece. He does welcome your question or comments. The Fool's disclosure policy is always attentive to the fundamentals.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Roscoe81082 wrote:

    There are many reasons that oil is increasing, and I don't believe speculation is one of them. Currency change (thanks Bernanke), increased demand, and a lack of a shift in the supply are the main reasons that oil prices have shifted. http://rhapsodiesofross.blogspot.com/2008/06/big-bad-oil.htm...

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2008, at 4:51 PM, ET114 wrote:

    Agree, it's not totally the buyers/speculators... but, fact remains the USA is an oil based economy... we need to bridge that gap... 2 suggestions to do now as we develop a forward-thinking method to get out of being oli-based...

    The 2 immediate steps:

    1. uncap the productive, existing wells in Alaska, Texas and Calif. there are thousands...

    2. park super tankers in the port(s) of Iraq, they must start paying....

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Matt8265 wrote:

    So GS says their no speculation eh? ... so let's just put a 35% margin on it and see what happens?

    Who the hell believes GS.... where is the SEC on this issue... getting paid off by GS ...as usual.

    Bullroar demand. The world has been in the crapper and oil prices have almost doubled. use your head for Chrissakes.

    It's 70% speculators and Congress knows it and won't do a thing. Grease those monkeys GS.. Grease those monkeys.

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2008, at 11:14 PM, ChannelDunlap wrote:

    I lay a large portion of the blame on speculators, while still thinking we should be taking steps to curb what actual increase is happening. Like I'm going to take the word of giant oil companies or, oh my gosh, an investment firm, both of which are making disgusting amounts of money off it, over my own common sense telling me that demand hasn't doubled in a year? Sure.

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2008, at 11:27 PM, 10qdetective wrote:

    David:

    Although I agree with the tone of your article, do not know if I agree with XOM as a LT buy. Believe BP struggle with 50-50 TNK-BP venture in Russia highlights dangers of nationalization policies throughout the world, which exposes Exxon & its int'l sisters to reserve replacement risks.

    http://industry.bnet.com/energy/2008/07/02/russia-holding-br...

    My Best,

    David J Phillips - Editor, www.10qdetective.blogspot.com

    Contributing Energy Analyst

    CNET/BNET

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2008, at 7:30 AM, KWT8011 wrote:

    I don't believe that banning speculation on oil would lead to a 50% drop or anything drastic like that, but let's consider the source: Oil companies, and a firm who makes a considerable amount of money brokering (is that the right verb?) futures contracts.... It's not all speculation, the dollar and demand certainly have a lot to do with it, but to argue it isn't a significant factor is short-sighted.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 677733, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/23/2009 1:11:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Buffett Bought Retail. Should You?

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 12:44 PM
GS $172.96 Up +2.95 +1.74%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
BP $58.63 Up +0.80 +1.38%
BP plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
REP $27.88 Up +0.56 +2.05%
Repsol YPF, S.A. (… CAPS Rating: ***
RDS-A $61.95 Up +1.29 +2.13%
Royal Dutch Shell… CAPS Rating: ****
XOM $75.84 Up +1.46 +1.96%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
SLB $65.02 Up +1.68 +2.65%
Schlumberger, Limi… CAPS Rating: *****
CHK $23.46 Up +0.43 +1.87%
Chesapeake Energy… CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Credit bureau: A credit bureau is an organization that maintains records on the credit worthiness of individuals. Most now use a credit score system that keeps track of credit history and considers factors like late payments, number and amounts of outstanding loans, credit card balances and income. Credit score now seems to have displaced the previously used credit rating system. A credit bureau will issue a…

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!